EDITORIAL Greeley aims at the wrong target
Fr. Andrew M. Greeley has enlivened
and enriched the U.S. Catholic experience with cutting edge sociology and a
spate of novels. His novels, though hardly high literature, can provide an
unblinking look at the often hidden warts of the institutional church; his
sociology has frequently cut to the quick.
His recent blast at reporting being done about the priest sex
abuse scandal, however, came off as just one more shrill call to shoot the
messenger. This in the face of mounting evidence that the Catholic church in
the United States has suffered a system-wide failure of its pastors to care for
some of its most vulnerable members. Greeleys attack on the media came in
an essay in the Feb. 10 issue of America magazine, a Jesuit
publication.
Greeleys specific target was Laurie Goodsteins Jan. 12
report in The New York Times that attempted to nail down numbers
regarding the priest sex abuse crisis and the implications of those
numbers.
No one has come close to anything resembling a full accounting
from the nations bishops on the dimensions of the crisis.
Though NCR urged such an accounting for years -- on the
number of priests, the number of victims and the cost in legal fees and
settlements -- none has been forthcoming.
The bishops are not just unwilling to cooperate; theyre
trying to inter the issue.
It remains to be seen whether the National Lay Review Board,
appointed by the bishops to look into the problem, will be able to compile
accurate and complete numbers.
For the moment, however, it is left to major journalism outlets
such as the Times to pursue the best accounting, short of gaining
cooperation from bishops, that is possible.
In the end, Goodsteins story amounted to a very conservative
assessment.
The implications she drew from interviews and old reports were
hardly anything new. Greeleys rather exaggerated characterization of the
lack of scientific sophistication in the details of those implications, as well
as his assignation of motive, have the defensive tone of a member of the
wounded fraternity.
Goodstein, he charges, wants to keep the media feeding
frenzy alive. The charges are unfair -- and untrue. The story isnt
over and wont be over until the details are public in every diocese.
Parents, parishioners and victims have a right to know.
It is no surprise that Greeley approvingly mentioned Peter
Steinfels, the former editor of Commonweal magazine. Steinfels wrote a
longer piece in Commonweal some months ago that had a similar tone,
castigating the press for taking off after this story as if it were anything
new. He is convinced that the story has been tightly confined to a specific
time frame and that the numbers he has mark the extent of the scandal.
Steinfels analysis has been referred to in the intervening
months as a reasonable, moderate take on the crisis. Undoubtedly, he, and now
Greeley, will provide a balm for the beleaguered priesthood.
The problem, however, is that the assertions of both writers are
fundamentally flawed. Both begin their critiques with the numbers of priests
involved in abusing children and the number of children abused. The simple fact
is those numbers are not known.
Dioceses have not revealed all. Prosecutors are still seeking to
unseal documents all over the country. Even victim support groups, who have
more elaborate lists than any journalism outlet, dont have the full
story.
What Greeley never mentioned, and what certainly should have
caught his statistical eye, is that in the case of the Boston archdiocese,
where full disclosure was forced, and the Baltimore archdiocese and the
Manchester, N.H., diocese where full disclosure was voluntary, the numbers of
priest abusers was several times higher than elsewhere.
Either there is a phenomenon peculiar to those three locations, or
we can expect the numbers to increase significantly should other dioceses also
make full disclosure.
Greeleys lobbing of the anti-Catholic bomb is irresponsible
and his claims are without foundation in fact. The real question is why the
Times and other major media outlets did not aggressively pursue the story years
earlier.
Greeley argues that while he is not a media basher, the sex abuse
crisis has become an occasion for Catholic bashing and celibate priest
bashing, an old custom dating to the 19th century that is as American as cherry
pie -- with the addition these days that a few self-serving resigned priests
join in the game. The sex abuse crisis has become an excercise in
Catholic bashing at a minor level for those who like to flay Catholics. But
those activities, while irritating, are an insignificant footnote to the
reality.
Most priests are healthy, and no responsible news outlet has
suggested otherwise. But it has hardly been just a few self-serving retired
priests who have raised questions about celibacy and about the ill effects on
the church when its leadership is an all-male, closed and secretive culture
accountable to no other individual or group in the wider community.
Greeley should hold his press-bashing ammo until more of the story
plays out. This week, for instance, we have to consider the grand jury report
out of Long Island, N.Y., a scathing report of a church that went to elaborate
lengths to protect clerics while intimidating or ignoring victims (see story,
Page 9). The report may sound like Catholic bashing, but it is just one more
piece of the puzzle showing the depth and awfulness of this scandal. It
wont end there. The churchs elaborate attempts at hiding the truth
from victims, the faithful and law enforcement are coming to light in dioceses
across the country where prosecutors and victims groups keep digging for
details.
Goodstein long ago earned a reputation as one of the more
distinguished religion writers in the country.
Taking cheap shots at someone trying to understand and report on
the systemic ills of an institution that positions itself as a major moral
arbiter in the wider culture is neither going to make the scandal go away nor
restore trust in the priesthood.
More than that, the cheap shots deflect our attention away from
what should be the primary focus: hundreds, thousands -- who can yet say -- of
children and young people who have been sexually abused in this country over
the past five decades by Catholic priests. It pains us to say that, but it is
the fact.
Suicides and wrecked lives have resulted. And the Catholic
hierarchy did everything it could to cover it up. Despite the recent glare of
the public spotlight, much of the truth still remains hidden.
National Catholic Reporter, February 21,
2003
|