Cover
story Reforms ignored goal: marriage promotion
While states threw most of their
welfare reform efforts into reducing rolls and encouraging work, some analysts
criticize the neglect of one of welfare reforms goals: strengthening of
marriage and family.
States have almost totally ignored this goal, said
Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation. This is a national disgrace.
Erosion of marriage is the cause of child poverty and welfare dependence.
Rector noted that a child born out of wedlock is 700 times more likely to live
in poverty than a child born to a couple in a stable marriage.
The Bush administration has said it will propose that Congress set
aside at least $100 million each year for experimental programs aimed at
getting single parents to marry.
Addressing this problem is an important step and is
potentially bipartisan, according to the Brooking Institutions Ron
Haskins. However, developing programs is a fairly delicate operation.
Its a hard thing to do, although there is widespread belief that marriage
is critical. The problem is that males available to mothers on welfare tend to
have characteristics that statistically dont make them desirable
mates such as unemployment and histories of domestic violence or
incarceration.
Nevertheless, since 1995, the rate of nonmarital births has
leveled off. Based on figures from the Census Bureau, the percentage of
children under 6 living with their married mother stopped a 30-year decline and
has increased every year but one since 1995. Haskins told the committee on the
budget for the U.S. House of Representatives that welfare reform may have
played some part in these shifts, despite the states lack of programs to
promote marriage.
Once mothers understood that they cannot permanently depend
on welfare, they begin to realize that they must have other sources of
income, Haskins said. The major means of achieving income for most
of these mothers is work. However, marriage can also increase the mothers
income if she marries a man who is employed.
Programs specifically designed to increase marriage and reduce
nonmarital births could mean even greater success, Haskins said.
Especially important would be programs that offer services to young
couples at the time of a nonmarital birth, Haskins said. Job
training and employment assistance, counseling and other services may prove
beneficial at the time of the birth when the parents are committed to each
other and their baby.
According to Rector, there are models in the private sector of
effective abstinence and marriage preparation programs. A Colorado marriage
preparation program called PREP has documented that divorce is reduced by as
much as 50 percent five years after the couple participated in the program,
Rector told NCR. These are programs we could fund tomorrow,
he said, although he said that they would have to be adapted for the inner
city.
The only state that has really started to do anything is
Oklahoma, Rector said. Beginning in 2000, that state has dedicated some
$10 million toward divorce reduction, but its not even a drop in
the bucket, Rector said.
Welfare recipient Patricia Capell of Kansas City, Mo., said she
would like to see marriage counseling being offered through the TANF program.
Capell has been married and divorced three times to men who went to prison.
If I had marriage counseling, maybe maybe I wouldnt be
divorced, she said.
Preventing divorce would also lower welfare dependence, Capell
said. Ive seen so many families go through a divorce and then run
to welfare, she said.
As for welfare reforms effects on the children in families
on welfare, studies have shown results have varied according to the
childs age. The Manpower Dem-onstration Research Corporation released
findings of 11 welfare programs in six states that showed elementary school
childrens academic performance improved when their parents participated
in welfare programs that combined work requirements with work supports.
Welfare reforms and antipoverty programs can have a positive
impact on childrens development if they increase employment and
income, the study said. But increasing employment alone does not
appear sufficient to foster the healthy development of children.
On the other hand, research has shown that adolescents in welfare
families may be having difficulties. Child Trends, a Washington-based research
center, examined data on three studies of welfare reforms effects on
adolescents. The group said that the adolescents whose parents participated in
welfare-to-work programs showed increased behavioral problems and lower
academic achievement.
Child Trends offered possible explanations: reduced parental
supervision and greater parental stress due to work requirements, and
adolescents being required to assume more adult responsibilities in the
household. The groups recommendations included after-school programs,
flexibility in parental working hours, and child care programs to minimize
reliance on adolescents for care of their younger siblings.
-- Teresa Malcolm
National Catholic Reporter, March 1,
2002
|