Pastoral ideas nixed as curia holds the
line
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff Rome
As the European synod drew to a close Oct. 23, the handful of bold
ideas heard over these past three weeks appeared destined not to survive in the
official proposals to be placed before the pope.
At least one prelate here says he knows why: the influence of the
Roman curia.
The synods final document was not complete as NCR
went to press. Based on early reports, however, it seemed there would be no
call for greater sharing of authority among bishops and the pope, no proposal
for women to head curial agencies, no movement toward allowing divorced and
remarried Catholics to receive the sacraments, and no plan for a wider program
of ordaining married men as priests.
All four ideas had been floated in the synod, either in individual
interventions or in the small group discussions.
Theres a strong lobby in opposition to any discussion
of that sort of thing from the curial bishops, said Archbishop Keith
Michael Patrick OBrien of Saint Andrews and Edinburgh in Scotland in a
briefing session with English-speaking journalists Oct. 20.
OBrien said that tension between curial cardinals and other
bishops has been palpable at the European Synod, as bishops working in dioceses
press for pastoral options while curial officials defend the status quo.
It hasnt quite come to blows, but views are put across
very, very strongly, OBrien said. According to the theology
of Vatican II, we are the vicars of Christ in our diocese. But some of the
bishops in Rome dont think that way.
In one of two English-language groups at the synod, the curial
influence was amplified through the voices of two Americans: Cardinal James
Stafford, president of the Pontifical Council for Laity; and Cardinal Adam
Maida of Detroit, a special papal appointee.
According to OBrien, several of the Europeans argued for
more flexibility from Rome on pastoral matters but met with resistance from the
Americans. English, Irish and Scottish bishops, for example, complained about
the Vaticans refusal to approve the use of general absolution under
special circumstances. General absolution is a form of the sacrament of
reconciliation in which the priest administers forgiveness to a group rather
than doing it individually.
Stafford and Maida spoke in favor of the Vatican position.
Stafford, according to OBrien, was especially vocal about his experiences
as a diocesan bishop of the value of one-to-one confession.
Stafford led the Denver archdiocese before his 1996 appointment to
Rome.
In the end, the group could not agree on any proposal on the
issue.
The group also discussed ordaining married men to the priesthood
in the Latin rite, an idea that had been expressed as a proposition by another
language group. OBrien said the curial bishops in the English group
stressed the value of celibacy so strongly they would have made it almost
a divine law. The most strident opposition to any change came from Maida
and Stafford, according to OBrien. Joining in the vote against discussion
of ordaining married men was Archbishop John Foley, formerly of Philadelphia
and now president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications.
Cardinal Francis Arinze, president of the pontifical council for
interreligious dialogue, was also a member of this language group.
In an interview with NCR, another prelate -- Cardinal
Godfried Danneels of Belgium -- used far more diplomatic language to agree that
the church today has a problem with over-centralization of power.
Danneels said that John Paul II has made attempts to share
authority, but that after 1,000 years of centralization, to open the
church to a new collegiality is not so easy. It will probably take two or three
more popes to find new ways of doing it.
Danneels said the bishops must take the initiative. You can
easily criticize the lack of collegiality, but give me a concrete proposal of
how to do it, Danneels said. We need to be more systematic in our
approach.
In a remarkably blunt assessment, OBrien said that both on
the synod floor and in small groups, curial cardinals tend to reject ideas that
contradict present Vatican policy. Their influence is strong enough to keep
proposals for change out of the synod documents, OBrien said.
In his small group, OBrien said, curial officials were four
of the 10 voting members and hence could block movement on many issues.
Danneels said he expects the topic of collegiality to be discussed
at the next general synod, devoted especially to the role of bishops. That
meeting is currently scheduled for October of 2000.
Among some residential bishops, OBrien said, there is a
frustration that the cardinals and archbishops who run curial agencies seem out
of touch with local realities.
As a case in point, OBrien said the bishops of Ireland,
Scotland, England and Wales had hoped to hold special sacrament of
reconciliation services during Lent in 2000, in keeping with the theme of the
Jubilee Year. The bishops hoped to include use of the so-called third
rite of reconciliation. That rite ends in a general absolution -- often
opposed by Vatican officials who fear that it will lead to a drop in individual
confessions.
The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the
Sacraments refused permission for the services. This was a proposal made
by our four hierarchies, drawing on bishops who are strong theologians and
relying on our own advisers, OBrien said. But Cardinal
[Estévez Jorge Arturo] Medina wouldnt budge. Medina heads
the congregation.
To break such logjams, OBrien said he thought another
council might be necessary. His suggestion echoed a comment made from the synod
floor by Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini of Milan, who said the time would be ripe
in the next decade to renew the sense of worldwide collegiality among bishops
experienced at Vatican II.
Danneels disagreed. To have a good council you have to
prepare it very well, he said. You cannot do it on two or three
questions, you have to do it on the general state of the church. I dont
know that we are ready to do that in the next one or two years.
But OBrien added that he wasnt talking about a council
merely of bishops. I see no reason why it shouldnt include members
of religious orders and laity, too, he said.
National Catholic Reporter, October 29,
1999
|