Theologian, under heavy fire, appeals to
pope
By PAMELA SCHAEFFER
NCR Staff
Harsh ecclesiastical penalties against one of Asia's best-known
theologians -- possibly the harshest applied to any theologian in recent times
-- are on hold, pending a reply from Pope John Paul II.
Oblate Fr. Tissa Balasuriya appealed to the pope against the
sanctions, which include excommunication, and then on Dec. 15 gained the
unanimous support of more than 80 Christian theologians meeting in the
Philippines. The theologians, meeting outside Manila as the fourth
international assembly of the Ecumenical Association of Third World
Theologians, agreed to write the pope and ask that Balasuriya be granted a
public hearing. They also declared they would continue to regard him as a
priest and theologian even if he were excommunicated from the church.
The 72-year-old Balasuriya made an unscheduled presentation to the
assembly. Previously he had been warned that unless he recanted his
nontraditional theological positions by signing a Vatican-produced profession
of faith, he would be subject to latae sententiae, or automatic
excommunication, under canon 1364 in the church's official Code of Canon Law.
The penalty was to take effect Dec. 8 until he bought more time with his recent
appeal to the pope.
Oblate Fr. Alexander Taché of Rome, mediator with the Holy
See, said the pope is expected to respond soon.
The canon applies to apostates, heretics and schismatics and
carries specific penalties for clerics. According to a commentary on canon 1364
in The Code of Canon Law: a Text and Commentary, edited by James A.
Coriden, Thomas J. Green and Donald E. Heintschel (Paulist Press, 1985),
clerics may be penalized more harshly for doctrinal offenses because "clerics
are apparently viewed as having special institutional responsibilities." Those
penalties may include loss of clerical faculties or dismissal from the clerical
state.
The canon warns, "If long lasting contumacy or the seriousness of
scandal warrants it, other penalties can be added, including dismissal from the
clerical state."
Balasuriya, a Sri Lankan, is a liberation theologian who has aimed
to recast Western theology for Eastern minds and interfaith settings. Sri
Lankan bishops have accused him of "irresponsible and immature theologizing" in
his 1990 book Mary and Human Liberation. But Balasuriya has argued in
written communication with NCR that his country's bishops have taken his
views out of context and distorted them. He was traveling in the Philippines
and unavailable for further comment before NCR went to press.
Balasuriya's book on Mary was published by his Center for Society
and Religion, which he founded in Colombo, Sri Lanka, in 1971, and had limited
distribution. It is virtually unavailable in the United States. In 1994, Sri
Lankan bishops published a statement saying that Balasuriya, in his book on
Mary, had misrepresented the doctrine of original sin and cast serious doubts
on the divinity of Christ, on his role as a redeemer and on the privileged
position of Mary.
Balasuriya holds degrees in theology from Gregorian University in
Rome and the University of Paris. He was formerly president of Aquinas
University College in Sri Lanka. He has founded a variety of organizations
devoted to peace, justice and interfaith concerns, including, in 1976, the
Ecumenical Association of Third World Theologians, the organization that gave
him its unqualified support on Dec. 15. His other books include The
Eucharist and Human Liberation, published by Orbis in 1978.
Balasuriya has repeatedly refused to sign the profession of faith
-- essentially a loyalty oath to Pope John Paul II -- given to him in mid-May
by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The congregation is headed
by doctrinal watchdog Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who has declared war on
theological "relativism."
The profession, which Balasuriya believes to have been drafted
particularly for him, "is ominously incomplete and potentially misleading" in
the way it quotes the documents of Vatican II, he wrote in an information
statement released Dec. 8. "It strangely omits the references to the paths of
salvation open to persons of other religions and to all persons of good
conscience as affirmed in Vatican II."
Balasuriya's most recent refusal to sign came on Dec. 7. Instead,
he signed earlier this year a profession of faith written by Pope Paul VI
(1963-78). Balasuriya added his own statement with his signature: that he was
signing "in the context of theological development and church practice since
Vatican II and the freedom and responsibility of Christians and theological
searchers under canon law."
Taché, who oversees relations between the Holy See and his
international religious order, the Oblates of Mary Immaculate, acknowledged
that the penalties cited in canon 1364 would be the harshest in memory to be
applied against a theologian.
The reason, Taché said, is that Balasuriya "is going
against very fundamental dogmas -- the universal redemption of Christ, original
sin" -- and "has shown a repeated refusal to subscribe to these elements of the
Catholic faith."
Given that, Taché said, it is possible to argue that a
stronger penalty is justified.
On the other hand, rather than excommunication, Taché said,
"It may be that the decision will be that he is not to be considered a Catholic
theologian, as was the case with Hans Küng."
Küng, a priest who recently retired from the University of
Tubingen in Germany, was declared to be no longer a Catholic theologian in
1979, a penalty prompted in part by his refusal to uphold the doctrine of papal
infallibility.
Taché added that if the pope returns the decision to the
Vatican congregation, further appeals could come. "The Holy Father could ask
the congregation to proceed in a particular way, or tell the congregation to
proceed as they feel proper," Taché said. "Then the person would have
some time for recourse."
"We all hope it's going to be resolved," Taché said.
"Balasuriya is not a young man. He has been with us for the last 50 years and
he is well-known and respected as a person.
"On the other hand, we certainly don't agree with his doctrinal
positions. We also respect those who are responsible for the integrity of the
faith in the church.
"It's a difficult situation," he said -- "one where you respect
and understand the position of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith;
on the other hand you have this person who is trying to survive, who may have
said or written something he feels is right."
Balasuriya says that the uniqueness of his work grows out of his
position as a minority Christian constantly challenged "to rethink the key
dogmas of the Christian tradition" to make them understandable to Hindus and
Buddhists. Sri Lanka, an island off the southeast coast of India, formerly
Ceylon, is predominantly Buddhist. Christians and Muslims are estimated to be 8
percent each of the population, Hindus 15 percent and Buddhists 69 percent.
Members of other faiths are often repulsed by some Christian teachings, such as
the notion that human beings are born in a state of alienation from their
creator, as presented in the doctrine of original sin, Balasuriya says.
In 1994, he replied to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith with 58 instances of what he said were misrepresentations of his work.
Last November the congregation described his reply as "unsatisfactory" and
enclosed the profession of faith.
The profession requires him to agree that the church "has no
authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women." It also requires
him to promise to adhere "with religious submission of will and intellect" to
the magisterium, even in the case of teachings that are not proclaimed to be
"definitive."
In his book on Mary, Balasuriya described her as the first woman
priest. He also argued that traditional Marian piety -- including the doctrines
of the immaculate conception and the assumption and despite such exceptions as
Our Lady of Guadalupe -- generally serves "the capitalist, patriarchal,
colonialist, first world of Christendom" at the expense of the poor and working
classes.
He has argued that recitation of the rosary, for example, diverts
attention from the need for human liberation -- that is, development as an
empowered human being in touch with gospel values.
At the theologians' meeting in the Philippines, Jesuit Fr. Samuel
Rayan, an Indian theologian, asked, "What right does Rome have to force a Sri
Lankan to take a profession of faith that no one else has to take?"
In his information statement, Balasuriya said he felt the
sanctions gravely violated "both my rights as a Catholic and a human
person."
"No one has still proved to any judicial tribunal that what I have
written is a defection from the Catholic faith," he wrote. "Many Catholic
theologians hold views similar to mine, but they have had no comparable
sanctions imposed on them. In fact, some others hold views quite contrary to
official church teachings, but they are not even questioned by the authorities.
Is this not a case of inequity?"
He continued: "I have repeatedly written to all authorities
concerned that I am prepared to correct myself publicly if I am proven wrong in
terms of contemporary theological scholarship before a fair tribunal. ... This
profession of faith is imposed on me as a punitive measure, presuming that I
have defected from the faith, without proving it. It is contrary to natural
justice to insist that I accept this unilateral judgment without any formal
hearing or trial."
He also cites canons from the official code, including Canon 221,
which states: "Christ's faithful may lawfully vindicate and defend the rights
they enjoy in the church before the competent ecclesiastical forum in
accordance with the law."
Balasuriya added: "Since 1945, I have given all my adult life to
the service of the church ... At the age of 72, after 51 years in the
Congregation of the Oblates and 44 years as a priest, I wish to remain a member
of the Catholic church. I will be in ecclesial and spiritual communion with the
church of Jesus even if legally excommunicated by ecclesiastical
authorities."
This story contains information supplied by Catholic News
Service.
National Catholic Reporter, December 27,
1996/January 3, 1997
|