Vatican excommunicates Balasuriya
By PAMELA SCHAEFFER
NCR Staff
In the way split images mesh when a camera is focused, Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger's crusade against relativism fused in early January with the
ministry of one of Asia's best-known theologians and priests.
The result: Ratzinger's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
zoomed in on Oblate Fr. Tissa Balasuriya, 72. In an unusually harsh penalty
delivered on Jan. 2, Balasuriya, of Sri Lanka, was declared excommunicated
under Canon 1364, a church law that applies to apostates and heretics.
As an excommunicated cleric -- only the second priest to be so
severely punished in recent times -- Balasuriya may neither receive nor
administer the sacraments, though he remains a priest unless formally
dismissed, according to James Coriden of Washington, an expert in canon
law.
Expulsion from Balasuriya's international religious order, the
Oblates of Mary Immaculate, could follow, depending on his future actions,
according to Oblate Fr. Alexander Tache, an official of the order in Rome.
Coriden said he thought that unlikely, and, indeed, Tache said he
hopes, rather, for reconciliation. In a statement issued Jan. 4, the Oblate
official said he hoped that Balasuriya would "take the necessary steps toward
reconciliation with the church, which it has always been his desire to
serve."
In such cases, opportunity exists for reconciliation and
reinstatement at any time, Coriden said.
Balasuriya has repeatedly said he regards the Vatican's procedure
against him as unjust. In a Jan. 8 telephone interview from his Center for
Society and Religion in Sri Lanka, he said he planned to appeal to the Supreme
Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, the judicial body with authority to
determine whether procedures in his case followed canon law.
He also set out his position in a written statement. There he
said, "I maintain that the charges made against me are incorrect in relation to
what I have written. I have not said what they say I have said." He maintained
that he had been denied due process, that his writings are within the bounds of
Catholic orthodoxy, and that many Western writers had expressed similar views
without threat of excommunication.
Although resolute in defense of his orthodoxy, Balasuriya is in
effect upping the ante in the conflict. In the interview, he said he considered
the congregation's action to be "providential" because it is sure to make his
views on Jesus and Mary better known. He added that he had been speaking with
publishers interested in giving wider distribution to his fateful book Mary and
Human Liberation.
So far, publication of the book has been limited to only a few
hundred English copies printed by his own center. He staunchly defends his way
of expressing Christian teachings as necessary in a part of the world where
Christians are a small minority -- just 8 percent in predominantly Buddhist Sri
Lanka.
Tache, the Oblate official mediating with the Holy See in the
case, said Oblates hope that Balasuriya will agree to the Vatican's terms,
which include signing a profession of faith, and be restored to the church. On
the other hand, "depending on his reaction," the order could formally expel him
under provisions of canon law, he said.
The 1800-word notification of Balasuriya's excommunication was
signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. In a final paragraph citing Canon 1364 of
the church's official Code of Canon Law, Ratzinger wrote, "Fr. Balasuriya has
deviated from the integrity of the truth of the Catholic faith and therefore
cannot be considered a Catholic theologian; moreover, he has incurred
excommunication latae sententiae" -- that is, automatically, as a result of his
actions.
The Vatican notification accused Balasuriya at least three times
of "relativizing" or "relativism" in his approach to Christian teachings in his
book on Mary. In October, Ratzinger said relativism would be his new target in
his efforts to enforce doctrinal orthodoxy in the worldwide church.
The notification was dated "2 January 1997, the feast of St. Basil
the Great and St. Gregory Nazianzen, bishops and doctors of the church." The
two fourth-century figures successfully defended orthodox teachings on Jesus
against Arians who denied the divinity of Christ.
Ratzinger said Balasuriya's book on Mary contains "a series of
grave errors" which "to different degrees are distortions of the truths of
dogma and are, therefore, incompatible with the faith.
"Fr. Balasuriya does not recognize the supernatural, unique and
irrepeatable character of the revelation of Jesus Christ, by placing its
presuppositions on the same level as those of other religions. In particular,
he maintains that certain 'presuppositions' connected to myths were
uncritically assumed to be revealed historical facts and, interpreted
ideologically by the clerical 'power holders' in the church, eventually became
the teaching of the magisterium.
"Fr. Balasuriya assumes, moreover, a discontinuity in the economy
of revelation," Ratzinger wrote. "In fact, he distinguishes between the faith
due in Christianity to what Jesus teaches and to what the churches have
subsequently developed as interpretations of his teaching" -- interpretations
that were influenced by "political and cultural interests. This position
involves, in fact, the denial of the nature of Catholic dogma and, as a
consequence, the relativizing of the revealed truths contained in them."
Further, Ratzinger said that Balasuriya had failed to explicitly
acknowledge the "divine sonship" of Jesus and had only "doubtfully
acknowledged" his "salvific function."
According to Ratzinger's notification, Balasuriya also denies the
dogma of original sin and certain Marian dogmas such as the doctrines of the
immaculate conception and the assumption, and, by extension, denies "the
authority of tradition as a mediation of revealed truth."
Further, the document contends that Balasuriya, by "denying and
relativizing some statements of both the extraordinary magisterium and the
ordinary universal magisterium," had in effect refuted papal infallibility.
Despite the limited distribution of Balasuriya's book, it caught
the attention of Sri Lankan bishops in June 1994. Warning of heretical
statements, the bishops counseled Catholics to avoid reading the book. In the
two and a half years since, Balasuriya has been engaged in continual conflict
with church authorities regarding his beliefs.
He has refused to sign a profession of faith provided him by the
Vatican -- one that explicitly endorses the church's opposition to ordaining
women. In his written statement, he said his "serious life commitment" could
not be reduced to a profession of faith intended to "buy" him a place in the
Catholic communion.
The request that he sign the profession followed a breakdown in
dialogue. Balasuriya, asked by Ratzinger to respond to doctrinal concerns,
wrote a lengthy letter saying that officials had misinterpreted his work.
In addition, Balasuriya signed a profession of faith written by
Pope Paul VI. "If I am not a Catholic theologian, then Paul VI is not,"
Balasuriya said in the interview.
But Ratzinger said in his Jan. 2 document that Balasuriya had
rendered that profession of faith "defective" by adding a caveat. It said that
Balasuriya agreed with the tenets "in the context of theological development
and church practice since Vatican II and the freedom and responsibility of
Christians and theological searchers under canon law."
At another point in the ongoing conflict, according to Tache,
Balasuriya threatened to take the bishops of Sri Lanka before the state
Mediation Board on a charge of defamation, along with editors who published the
bishops' 1994 denunciation of his book. He later changed his mind.
In December, Balasuriya appealed personally to Pope John Paul II,
who, according to Tache, responded by saying that he had been following the
case and agreed with the decisions of Ratzinger's congregation.
Balasuriya said a petition is circulating globally on his behalf,
asking the pope to grant him a "fair judicial trial in keeping with the
provisions of the canon law of the church."
He added, "Third World theologians and many of my friends say they
will always regard me as a priest. Priesthood is not merely an external
sacramental function. My understanding of priesthood is one who gives his life
for the cause of making Jesus and Mary better known, of human rights and
justice and the rights of women. So I remain a priest in that sense.
"I am much more in the community of disciples of Jesus than ever
before," he said. "There is also a mystical, spiritual communion. Maybe legally
I am cut off but spiritually I am more in communion than ever before. The CDF
has put me in communion with people all over the world. This is a beautiful
experience in life, so I think there is something providential in this."
As for the Vatican's potential negative reaction to wider
distribution of his book, Balasuriya said, "Our task is to make people happy to
bear witness to Jesus and Mary for who they were known in reality."
Although a number of clerics have been deprived of their status as
Catholic theologians in recent years, the only priest to be excommunicated in
recent times was Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. He denounced the teachings of
Vatican II and finally incurred the ultimate penalty in 1988 for ordaining four
bishops to his traditionalist movement in defiance of the Holy See.
National Catholic Reporter, January 17,
1997
|