EDITORIAL As Guatemala starts healing, U.S. can't turn away
The acknowledgment, bland as a stock
report or weather forecast, was part of nearly every newspaper story about the
signing of Guatemala's peace accords: The three and a half bloody decades of
civil war began with a CIA-backed coup and continued with U.S. aid and a string
of brutal dictators propped up by the United States.
Having done that perfunctory duty vis-a-vis the historical record,
the news accounts went on to relate the tensions remaining in Guatemala and the
difficulties Guatemalans face in achieving normality following so many years of
hatred and extreme violence.
And one is left feeling that this was just another
south-of-the-border oddity, a Central American curiosity that, duly noted, can
be tucked away until the next historic tremor.
Inevitable as it might be that humans will make war and even
eventually grow weary of the violence, the bloody modern history of Central and
South America is not something from which North Americans can casually turn
away.
Guatemala is an especially poignant case. The stark truth remains
that in the interest of U.S. business and under the political guise of fighting
Marxism, the United States unleashed an era of vicious rule that has left deep
scars in this hemisphere (see related story).
There is no way to overstate the crime here. The record is
embarrassingly clear and elaborately detailed in files of the CIA and other
government agencies -- many files long ago made public and some of more recent
vintage still hidden.
From the overthrow of the elected government of Jacobo Arbenz more
than 40 years ago to the more recent rape and torture of U.S. Ursuline Sr.
Dianna Ortiz, the United States has been complicit in heinous crimes against
countless civilians and courageous religious figures. In the process, we as a
nation have consistently trampled our noblest instincts and the highest
purposes of our own founding documents.
A component of the post-Cold War world is the wide movement toward
democracy, often at great cost to individual heroes and noncombatants. In the
wake of such struggles, from Eastern Europe to South Africa to Latin America,
populations and cultures are undertaking extremely difficult processes of
post-war accounting and reconciliation.
Our political leaders have had much to say about the need for
courage and accountability to accompany steps toward reconciliation in other
cultures. What has been missing is our own willingness to admit our partnership
in the past shames of this hemisphere and an offer to join in the healing
process, not as an overlord but as a partner this time of those who have
suffered.
Instead, our eagerness for normality is essentially an eagerness
for stability in new markets. Economics, not justice, is again the measure of
progress.
The mainstream media, in detaching its recitation of data from any
sense of outrage, joins in the complicity. But a self-inflicted blindness is no
protection from the truth.
The story of U.S. involvement in Guatemala will not be contained
in a few throwaway paragraphs. The wounds the U.S. helped inflict are now
deeply written into the story of people we call our neighbors.
More than 100,000 people died, some 40,000 disappeared, upwards of
a million were displaced and countless numbers were tortured during the decades
when blood ran free in this gorgeous country.
Guatemala eventually may find its peace through processes that
will allow all to confront the horrors of the recent past. The question facing
North America remains: What is the process that will give us peace?
National Catholic Reporter, January 17,
1997
|