Priest's action highlights rights abuses in
China
By TOM ROBERTS
NCR Staff
While the debate grows in the United States about how to address
human rights abuses in China, a Capuchin friar has launched a campaign to draw
attention to the abuses by taking on The Boeing Co., which has dominated the
Chinese market for Western-made planes.
Fr. Michael Crosby has caused a stir at the highest level of The
Boeing Co. by filing a shareholder resolution asking the company to develop
human rights criteria for its operations in China.
The story of Crosby's approach to Boeing and his ultimate filing
of a shareholder resolution reveals the highly sensitive nature of the issue.
At one point, Crosby was visited at his office in Milwaukee's inner-city by
three high-level Boeing executives who, during a more than three-hour meeting,
attempted to convince him to withdraw the resolution.
The resolution, with an opposing recommendation from Boeing
officials, will be voted on during the annual shareholders' meeting April 28 at
Boeing's Seattle headquarters.
Although other religious groups may be sympathetic to Crosby's
cause, none has been very vocal. According to experts, many religious groups
that have not yet formulated a policy on China face a dilemma: speak out on
human rights or continue to have access to do missionary work in China.
An exception was Archbishop Theodore McCarrick, chairman of the
International Policy Committee of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops.
In a Dec. 3 letter to then U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher,
McCarrick said the bishops "are deeply distressed by recent reports about the
diminished place of human rights in U.S.-China relations at a time when
religious and political persecution in China is on the rise. We note recent
reports of increased arrests of clergy and interference with gatherings for the
purpose of worship. ... We believe the suffering believers of China, including
Catholics of the unauthorized 'underground church,' Tibetan Buddhists and
Christian evangelicals deserve effective diplomatic defense on the part of the
United States. Similarly, prison laborers and pro-democracy activists should
expect more from our country than kind words."
Crosby's shareholder resolution comes on the heels of a growing
dispute over the Clinton administration's 1994 decision to "delink" concern
about human rights monitoring from issues of U.S. trade and a few initiatives
in Congress to reverse the decision. The matter may be further complicated by
the death Feb. 19 of China's 93-year-old leader Deng Xiaoping. Deng is credited
with having opened China to the international market, improving life for
millions of Chinese. At the same time, he ruled the political arena with an
absolute grip, tolerating no dissent and squashing expressions of freedom and
challenges to the Communist Party.
Michael Jendrzejczyk (pronounced Jendreezik), Washington director
of Human Rights Watch Asia, said, "Since May '94, the [Clinton] administration
not only has repudiated the policy of linking trade and human rights, it is
going further and trying to delink the entire Sino-U.S. relationship, economic
and political." Human Rights Watch Asia is a privately funded human rights
organization.
"Beijing and Washington have reached a tacit understanding,"
Jendrzejczyk said, "that warming political and economic relationships go
hand-in-hand and that human rights will be kept on the margin."
At the same time, it is generally agreed that human rights abuses
in China are on the rise. A 1996 report by the U.S. State Department on human
rights around the world concluded: "Chinese authorities stepped up efforts to
cut off expressions of protest or criticism. All public dissent against the
party and government has been effectively silenced by intimidation, exile, the
imposition of prison terms, administrative detention or house arrest."
Nine principles
In his shareholder resolution, filed for the Corporate
Responsibility Office of the Province of St. Joseph of the Capuchin Order,
Crosby asks Boeing to abide by nine principles in its dealings in China.
The principles ask Boeing to refrain from using "goods or products
manufactured by forced labor in the People's Republic of China and Tibet." They
ask protection for Chinese and Tibetan employees who engage in nonviolent
demonstrations or have past records for such activities or who hold membership
in unofficial nonviolent groups.
The principles also seek environmental protections; a prohibition
against military presence on the premises where Boeing work is performed; and
promotion of freedom of association and assembly.
The principles ask that Boeing press Chinese authorities to "list
those arrested in the last three years, to end incommunicado detention, and [to
grant] access to international observers to places of detention."
The resolution notes that in 1994 Clinton promoted "constructive
engagement" through business contacts as the best way of ensuring human rights.
In 1997, Crosby wrote, "Clinton admitted his 'constructive engagement' policy
had not produced positive results regarding human rights in China."
The administration, however, persists in its belief that
"constructive engagement" remains the best long-term approach to the human
rights issue.
In correspondence with Boeing officials that began in October,
Crosby refers to a newspaper characterization of Boeing as "China's most
valuable lobbyist" and expresses Crosby's disappointment that the company
"seems to be so diffident toward the Chinese government, which has been so
blatant in its repression of its own people and the people of Tibet."
In a recent interview, Crosby told NCR that he came to the
issue of China by way of his order's concern about the people of Tibet.
"The issue of Tibet for us paralleled our experience of the Native
American people," he said.
The order works among several American Indian groups in Montana
and northern Michigan. In the case of Native Americans, said Crosby, it was not
just a matter of a more powerful group taking over another group, but "by
crossbreeding and other ways and sending more and more of its own into the
territory, undermining the very cultural identity of the people."
Crosby said, "There was a parallel with what China is doing to
repopulate Tibet."
As he read more and more about U.S. corporate involvement in
China, the issue of abuse became more centered on China itself. As he wrote a
chronology for himself, "I began seeing it in black and white, one thing after
another: accounts of abuse, the tightening of the grip of Chinese leaders on
any form of dissent. And then I saw the degree to which Boeing was in the
leadership of U.S. corporations to keep U.S. policy from addressing human
rights. There is no way we can be silent on this issue."
Boeing was a major force in lobbying the Clinton administration to
delink human rights from trade decisions and in conferring Most Favored Nation
trading status on China.
The airplane manufacturer was one of 10 corporations that jointly
wrote Clinton on May 11, 1994, "to offer our support for reaching a long-term
solution to the China MFN and human rights conundrum."
While recognizing the importance of human rights "as a fundamental
cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy," the group wrote, "it is our firm belief
that pursuing U.S. commercial interest with China is not only fully compatible
with our human rights and other objectives, but, in fact, acts to reinforce
these objectives.
"For each of our companies, China is a major growth market of the
future. We estimate that in 10 years our cumulative sales to China will reach
$158 billion assuming normalized relations."
The group, which included Chrysler Corp., Digital, Kodak, General
Electric, Honeywell, Motorola, TRW and AT&T, concluded, "We urge you to
pursue an approach towards China which does not put at risk the commercial
relationship in order to advance other policy interests."
An attachment to the letter detailing the activities of U.S.
corporations in China noted that 13 Chinese airlines now fly more than 170
Boeing aircraft. "The number will soon rise to 15 airlines and 234 aircraft.
Boeing jetliners are the mainstay of China's air travel and cargo system,
enabling a greater movement of people and commerce than ever before."
In a Dec. 13 letter responding to Crosby's intention to write a
shareholder resolution, Heather Howard, Boeing corporate secretary and
corporate counsel, restated the company's belief that "Boeing products,
technology, services and our way of doing business are bettering conditions in
China."
"The question," she wrote, "is whether stating 'human rights
criteria' for Boeing business operations" in China "would enhance or accelerate
the social benefits of our business there."
The hostility of the Chinese toward any criticism from the outside
was exemplified earlier this year, Howard wrote, when the Chinese government
"deflected major commercial aircraft orders and a new airplane business
venture" to the Europeans. "That loss of $1.5 billion in sales and of a
prospective joint venture was widely recognized as retaliation for U.S.
congressional and administrative judgments on China."
On Jan. 14, Crosby received a visit from three Boeing executives,
Michael Zimmerman, president of Boeing China, Valerie Kasuca-Smick, Boeing's
program manager for Asia Trade Development, and corporate counsel Howard.
According to Crosby's minutes of the meeting, which also included
representatives of two other groups cosponsoring the resolution, the group
discussed details of Boeing's activities in China and how the company felt it
was enhancing human rights in China. The other sponsoring groups are the
Passionist Community of Chicago and Franklin Research and Development
Corporation of Boston.
From 9:30 a.m. until 1:15 p.m., Crosby said, the participants
engaged in frank discussion but did not reach an agreement that would have
persuaded the sponsors to withdraw the shareholder resolution.
Improved human rights
A month later, after acknowledging the Crosby resolution, Boeing
sent him a copy of the company's response asking that the proposal be defeated.
"The Board of Directors believes that the lives of hundreds of millions of
Chinese have improved dramatically under economic reform and through the
engagement in China of international companies, including Boeing. As former
U.S. Ambassador to China Staleton Ropy has stated, the recent years of modern
China's history are 'the best in terms of prosperity, individual choice, access
to outside sources of information, freedom of movement within the country and
stable domestic conditions.'
"Boeing's participation in China's economic modernization effort
in the past 25 years has contributed to this dramatic increase in living
standards of the average Chinese citizen and improved the overall human rights
environment in China."
The Chinese further benefit through regular training programs that
bring Chinese workers to the United States, exposing them to Western thought
and culture, according to the company statement.
With other issues he has taken on in the past -- apartheid in
South Africa, the tobacco industry and the overseas marketing practices of
infant formula companies -- Crosby has received a great deal of public support
from religious groups. But that is not the case with China. Most denominations
and orders are still trying to figure out a strategy, he said. In doing so,
organizations are weighing activism against the chance to enter China to do
missionary work. "It isn't that they have been remiss in any way," he said.
"The issue is just coming to the fore and they don't really have a position.
They don't know whether they should say something and, secondly, what they
should say."
According to Jendrzejczyk, there is great concern in the religious
community, but the issue is just beginning to surface in a public way.
Religious groups are constantly asking his organization about Protestant and
Catholic communities in China and the plight of dissidents.
The situation highlights the importance of shareholder
resolutions, he said. Boeing and the U.S. government have leverage that can be
applied. "Two things China wants from us," said Jendrzejczyk, "are admission
into the World Trade Organization on terms they feel are acceptable and
permanent Most Favored Nation status. That is where the United States has
substantial leverage."
Tim Smith, executive director of the Interfaith Center for
Corporate Responsibility, disagrees about the religious community's reluctance.
The ICCR, he said, acts on the concerns of member organizations, which include
Catholic and Protestant groups, including religious orders and a few
dioceses.
He said he believes most religious communities simply have not
gotten around to the China question. Most have "very full plates" when it comes
to matters of corporate responsibility, "from apparel to diversity issues to
the environment -- we've got about 150 to 200 issues we're already working on,"
said Smith. To take on China would require an enormous amount of "homework," he
said.
Such actions also usually stem from requests of religious leaders
inside the country in question. "In China," he said, "there has been no sort of
directive or urging from religious leaders to take position a or b."
Smith applauded Crosby's resolution, saying it does not dictate
specifics, but urges Boeing to develop its own criteria based on general
principles.
National Catholic Reporter, February 28,
1997
|