New Catholic-evangelical mix
surfaces
By ARTHUR JONES
NCR Staff
Evangelicals are among the many Protestants flocking to Catholic
retreat centers and monasteries, and Catholic social teaching is attracting
evangelical admirers such as David Neff, editor of Christianity Today --
the movement's major publication.
At the same time, increasing numbers of Catholics appear to be
acknowledging that evangelicalism's scripture-based energy and enthusiasm has a
place in their lives, too.
The increasing contacts among these constituencies, historically
at odds with one another, is documented more through anecdote and the actions
of leaders of the respective groups than through scientific studies. It has
been known for some time that some Catholics seeking scripture study often
attend evangelical Bible groups. And one national survey hints that grassroots
Catholics may be joining the trend because the language they use in speaking
about about faith matches that used by evangelicals.
However deep the associations between the two groups, there was no
disputing that something new was afoot April 26 in Philadelphia, when
Protestant evangelicals and Catholics met to discuss "The Church Steps Forward:
A Christian Roundtable on Poverty and Welfare Reform."
Participants represented groups ranging from the Catholic Campaign
for Human Development to the evangelical World Vision, from the National
Association of Evangelicals to the National Council of Churches, from Promise
Keepers to the Salvation Army, from Bread for the World to Habitat for
Humanity.
The meeting was billed not as a one-time event, but as "the start
of a crucial conversation between diverse church constituencies" on issues
facing the poor.
At the base of this new venture is what appears to be a growing
evangelical-Catholic search for common ground. The Philadelphia gathering -- an
attempt to build coalitions among moderately progressive to moderately
conservative Christian groups -- followed a 1994 declaration by groups and
individuals on the conservative end of the political spectrum. That group's
declaration was titled, "Evangelicals and Catholics Together: The Christian
Mission in the Third Millennium."
Signers included Charles Colson, prison ministries founder and
former Watergate conspirator; Fr. Richard John Neuhaus, a Catholic convert from
Lutheranism; Kent Hill, former director of the Institute for Religion and
Democracy and now of Boston's Eastern Nazarene College; George Weigel, then
director of the Ethics and Public Policy Institute in Washington; New York
Cardinal John O'Connor; Archbishop Francis Stafford, then of Denver and now in
Rome; Michael Novak of the American Enterprise Institute; and Jesuit Fr. Avery
Dulles.
Sacramental system
While the main point of the joint statement was to fight abortion,
the 1994 declaration concerned itself also with issues such as the "right
ordering of civil society," and pressed for parental choice in education.
To the suggestion at the time that the declaration sounded like a
partisan conservative agenda, Neuhaus replied, "It's just not true." If
liberals weren't warm to the statement, many conservative Protestant
evangelicals also were not happy, and some signed a follow-up document the next
year distancing themselves from "Roman Catholic doctrinal distinctives" and
"church systems."
To assess the current mix of evangelical-Catholic activities,
NCR interviewed Alister McGrath in Oxford, England, and the Rev. James
Wallis of Sojourners Community in Washington.
McGrath, principal of the grassy, gray stone Wycliffe Hall on
Oxford's Banbury Road, is the author of Evangelicalism and the Future of
Christianity, (InterVarsity Press, 1995) and A Passion for Truth: the
Intellectual Coherence of Evangelicalism, (InterVarsity Press 1996). He
sees evangelicalism, with its capacity for bringing the scriptures into
everyday life, as "virtually alone" in contemporary Christianity in its
"ability to bring individuals to faith from a secular culture."
McGrath argued -- without producing statistics -- that
evangelicalism is "the largest and most actively committed form of Christianity
in the West," but that its makeup masks its growth. That is because
evangelicalism is not a denomination in itself (though some denominations are
totally evangelical), but a movement that carries itself familiarly through
many denominations.
To Wallis it is no news that "the largest, growing segments of
Christendom in the United States are those associated with evangelicalism,
Pentecostalism and Catholicism," particularly Catholics associated with
spiritual renewal.
"Spiritual renewal is the tie-in between the Catholic side and the
evangelical side," said Wallis, who established Sojourners community in 1975 in
a faded former embassy in Washington's tough Columbia Heights' district. The
community produces Sojourners magazine and serves the neighborhood poor
with a wide array of ministries.
What's happening in the broad evangelical-Catholic renewal,
surmised Wallis, is a growing convergence over the issues of Catholic social
teaching. "If you could combine the energy of active Catholic social teaching
with the renewed interest of evangelicals around both poverty and racism, with
the renewal and vitality of the black churches, you would have a very powerful
force. And it would include portions of the mainline churches drawn to that,
though that's not where their leadership is," he said.
Neff, the Christianity Today editor, said that as he writes
editorials that deal with social issues he always makes sure he takes a look at
"Catholic social teaching -- on whatever topic -- if we're dealing with an area
that would come under the general umbrella of 'the culture of death,' " he
said, using a phrase coined by Pope John Paul II.
On labor and economic issues, too, though less frequently, he'll
consider Catholic thought on the matter, though that thought is variously
interpreted, he said, because within evangelicalism "there is no cohesive body
of thought on those things."
As Neff sees it, "Part of the bridge between evangelicalism and
Roman Catholicism has been through the pro-life movement, and through that
movement we've discovered that there is more than simply antiabortion -- there
is more cohesiveness to it," he said. Not least, as a Chicago area resident, he
added, he was "well aware" of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin's seamless
garment ethic when considering life issues.
While the leading evangelical publication looks in on Catholicism
in the social arena, some say Catholics appear to be looking to evangelicalism
in the area of personal belief. A 1997 nationwide survey by the Barna Report
claims that 43 percent of all Christian adults are now "born-again"
(evangelical), up seven percentage points since 1994.
The increase, contends Barna, "is largely due to the rapid
expansion of born-again Christians within the Catholic church." Barna did not
ask the Catholics if they considered themselves "born-again," the group's David
Kinnaman told NCR.
Born-again Christian in the survey, he said, are people "who say
they have 'made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important
in their life today' and that they believe that after they die they will 'go to
Heaven because [they] have confessed their sins and have accepted Jesus Christ
as [their] savior."
When NCR suggested that such broad definitions could apply
to most Catholics at Sunday morning Eucharist, Kinnaman demurred. Being
"born-again" requires a personal conversion experience, he said.
Historically, American Protestantism, writes Jim Wallis in the
May-June Sojourners, split in the early 1900s when " 'fundamentalists' took the
conservative road of personal piety and correct doctrine, while 'modernists'
chose the liberal path of the social gospel."
Catholics were not considered Christians in these camps, and
racial segregation was the prevailing preference. Thus, writes Wallis, "the
four basic constituencies of American Christianity have remained apart:
evangelical, mainline Protestant, Catholic and the historic black
churches."
American Protestant fundamentalism took its name from a series of
12 books titled The Fundamentals, the first of which was published in
1910. McGrath said fundamentalists at first simply saw themselves as returning
to biblical orthodoxy, a reaction to "modernity." Fundamentalism's "central
doctrines" (the absolute, literal authority of scripture and the premillennial
return of Christ) along with its "siege mentality" in defending itself against
a hostile, unbelieving, secular culture, became its leading characteristics, he
said.
The Scopes "monkey trial" in 1925 -- when Tennessee teacher John
T. Scopes was prohibited from teaching evolution -- was fundamentalism's
"biggest public relations disaster," said McGrath. It pitted William Jennings
Bryan (on the side of the creationists) for the prosecution against Clarence
Darrow for the defense. Bryan won in court and lost in the public arena.
"From that point on," wrote McGrath, "fundamentalism became as
much a cultural stereotype as a religious movement. It was only with the
emergence of a new form of evangelicalism after World War II that momentum and
credibility were regained." Fundamentalism, meanwhile, had withdrawn from "what
it regarded as a corrupt society and an apostate church."
Evangelicalism is "a post-fundamentalist phenomenon" that avoids
the weaknesses of both fundamentalism and modernism, McGrath said, and is
especially associated with Billy Graham and Carl F. Henry, Christian leaders
"disillusioned with fundamentalism, but for different reasons."
Henry argued that fundamentalists did not present Christianity as
a world-view with a distinctive social vision; Graham, "sick and fed up" with
controversies, "wanted to get on with preaching the gospel."
McGrath described evangelicalism's six "fundamental convictions"
as:
1. The supreme authority of scripture as a source of knowledge of
God and a guide to Christian living.
2. The majesty of Jesus Christ, both as incarnate God and Lord and
as the savior of sinful humanity.
3. The lordship of the Holy Spirit.
4. The need for personal conversion.
5. The priority of evangelism for both individual Christians and
the church as a whole.
6. The importance of the Christian community for spiritual
nourishment, fellowship and growth.
All other matters, wrote McGrath, "have tended to be regarded as
'matters of indifference,' on which a substantial degree of latitude and
diversity may be accepted, a diversity grounded in the New Testament,
however.
"Responsible evangelicalism," he wrote, "refuses to legislate
where scripture is silent. Evangelicalism has refused to treat knowledge as
something abstract; instead it recognizes it to be strongly experiential and
personal, capable of transforming both the heart and the mind."
Scripture, McGrath said, defines evangelicalism's center of
gravity, not the limits of its reading or knowledge; it is "the central
legitimating source of Christian faith and theology, the clearest window
through which the face of Christ may be seen."
What evangelicalism lacks, he said, is a spirituality that
prevents burnout. Consequently, when "people need help with prayer, devotion
and personal discipline, if evangelicalism is not providing it, is it really
surprising they turn elsewhere [and] end up committed to a form of
Catholicism?"
Franciscan Fr. Joseph Nangle, who worked with Wallis and the
Sojourners community from 1990 to 1994, has a firsthand Catholic view of the
significance of progressive and moderate evangelicalism. The evangelicals'
heavy dependence on scripture for moral guidance is a quite sophisticated
understanding of God's word, he says, that can "tend a little toward the
fundamental, though not necessarily.
"Our [Catholic] social doctrine is just good news to them when
they're open to it," said Nangle, "and I'd love to see them engage in our
sacramental system -- those moments of encounter with the Lord in the Eucharist
and reconciliation. They have it," he said, "but it's more casual, I think,
compared to their intense use of the scriptures."
What Catholics don't understand, he said, is "the great
possibility for social engagement on the part of evangelicals. When they get on
to it, they're phenomenal. I think they're able to hold together personal
morality and social morality if you will -- something we liberationists could
learn from."
Wallis said, "On issues facing poor people and social policy,
there's a growing convergence of progressive and moderate evangelicals with
Catholics. The pro-life convergence is important too. I'm part of that.
"By pro-life I don't mean criminalizing abortion," he said. "There
is a broad consensus we have to reduce the abortion rate, that's an important
moral imperative. By pro-family I don't mean antifeminist or anti-gay, but that
the re-establishment of the bonds of family and community are critical in a way
that is in fact pro-equality of men and women and pro at least civil rights for
homosexuals."
The emphasis is Christianity first and politics next, said Wallis.
While this growing alliance of Catholics with progressive evangelicals is not a
movement, it might function as a nonparty political alliance. Evangelicals,
Wallis said, are drawn more in the direction of the U.S. Catholic Conference
than toward the National Council of Churches "because evangelicals are looking
for a social policy place to turn.
"They're not going to go the Protestant liberal left-wing
Democratic Party way," he said, "but they do want to go somewhere on the poor
people's issues."
National Catholic Reporter, May 9, 1997
|