Theologians opt for diplomacy in dispute
By PAMELA
SCHAEFFER NCR Staff Minneapolis
Catholic theologians attending the national meeting of the
Catholic Theological Society of America here June 5-8 struggled to broker
theology with an invisible but powerful presence: Rome.
In intermittent business sessions, scheduled among talks on
theological perspectives on the Eucharist, theologians debated the implications
of a cautiously worded resolution aimed at the church's ban on women
priests.
Looming in the foreground, though little discussed, were the
Vatican's just-released criticisms of proposed U.S. guidelines for implementing
Ex Corde Ecclesiae, Pope John Paul II's 1990 Apostolic Constitution on
Higher Education (see NCR's June 6 issue and an editorial in this issue,
page 28).
The demand for more work on the guidelines came just a week before
the theological society's meeting opened here and took many participants by
surprise.
The resolution on women's ordination, passed 10 to 1 on the second
day of the convention, says that, given widespread disagreements among
theologians and faithful Catholics about the church's ban on women priests, the
matter should remain open to debate. That position addresses the Vatican's
assertion that the doctrine is "definitive" and "infallibly taught" and
requires the assent of the faithful.
The resolution is essentially the conclusion to a 4,500-word
paper, Tradition and the Ordination of Women, which reviews and questins
scriptural and theological principles that underlie the ban. At issue is Pope
John Paul II's assertion that the church lacks authority to ordain women
because there is no basis for the practice in scripture or tradition (set forth
in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, 1994) and a claim by Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, that the
prohibition on women priests belongs to the deposit of faith and
has been infallibly taught (Responsum, 1995).
Neither the theological society's paper nor its resolution
advocates ordaining women, although a strong majority of theologians at the
meeting clearly would favor such a change.
The paper has been under revision since last June when it was sent
to the society's 1,300 members for criticism and reflection.
Jon Nilson of Loyola University, Chicago, moderator of the task
force that prepared the society's paper, said the goal was to lay out questions
as "a starting point for more reflection.
"This is a major issue in the church today," he said. "It's not a
time to shoot from the hip."
In a preamble to the resolution, the theological society's board
stressed the intention of making a "positive contribution" to the church's
"maturing of reflection on the deposit of faith" rather than to oppose the
magisterium in a spirit of dissent.
The resolution, approved by a vote of 216 to 22 with 10
abstentions, will be sent to presidents of national bishops' conferences in
Canada and the United States.
In a small group discussion of Ratzinger's Responsum,
Bishop Raymond Lucker of New Ulm, Minn., said theologians had been put in an
awkward position with regard to the doctrine. "Cardinal Ratzinger has said we
have the conclusion, now we need the reasons," he said. "When we face that, we
realize we have very serious problems. How can we support that which has no
reasons?"
The society's paper notes a shift in recent Vatican documents in
arguments supporting the ban. "Some arguments which have been used in the past
do not appear in recent official statements," the paper says. "Other reasons
are now being proposed as the basis in revelation for the church's belief that
women cannot be ordained priests."
One of the strongest critics of the document and resolution was
Fr. Matthew Lamb of Boston College, who argued in a two-page statement of his
own that the society's paper was "inadequate and misleading" and "drifts into a
clear advocacy position by failing to communicate clearly" the church's
arguments against ordaining women.
Forthright discussion of the Vatican's response to implementation
of Ex Corde Ecclesiae in the United States was short-circuited by a plea
from Monika K. Hellwig, executive director of the Association of Catholic
Colleges and Universities. Addressing the full assembly of theologians, Hellwig
asked them to avoid portraying the development as a showdown between U.S.
leaders and the Vatican. "Blowing it up in the press or elsewhere" could cause
more trouble for the project, she said.
As a result, responses were muted. Jesuit Fr. Leo O'Donovan,
president of Georgetown University in Washington, said only, "It naturally
concerns me that a document the American bishops overwhelmingly approved has
raised concern at the Congregation for Education." O'Donovan has been
integrally connected to the bishops' work.
The Vatican Congregation on Catholic Education, headed by Cardinal
Pio Laghi, notified U.S. bishops that officials were expecting more attention
to Canon 812, a church law dreaded by many U.S. theologians and university
leaders. The canon requires theologians teaching in colleges or universities to
have a mandate from "the competent ecclesiastical authority," understood to
mean the local bishop. U.S. academics have been deeply concerned in recent
years about the canon, arguing that its application in the United States would
undermine the academic enterprise by violating principles of academic
freedom.
Laghi also said the revised U.S. guidelines would now be handled
by the Congregation for Bishops, headed by Cardinal Bernardin Gantin, rather
than by Laghi's congregation, as it has been from the beginning.
Hellwig told theologians the transfer of authority was
"worrisome." It was unexpected and had not been explained, she said.
Further, she said the Vatican wanted clarification of U.S.
bishops' 1989 document "Doctrinal Responsibilities: Approaches to Promoting
Cooperation and Resolving Misunderstandings Between Bishops and Theologians."
Specifically, officials want to know what happens if, after guidelines are
followed, the result is a deadlock between bishop and theologian, she said.
O'Donovan, one of few university administrators at the meeting,
said he was attending because a good friend, Sr. Anne Carr, was receiving the
society's John Courtney Murray Award for distinguished achievement in theology.
Carr, a member of the Sisters of Charity and professor at the University of
Chicago Divinity School, has struggled in recent years with a recurring,
nonmalignant brain tumor and recently returned to teaching after a year-long
medical leave.
Carr is author of Transforming Grace: Christian Tradition and
Women's Experience and The Search for Wisdom and Spirit: Thomas Merton's
Theology of the Self, both published in 1988.
Looking back on her career, which began with graduate study of
theology in the early 1960s -- a time when women were often discouraged, if not
actually barred, from studying the subject -- Carr recalled that, after she
heard theologian Bernard Cooke deliver a series of lectures, her mother
superior had asked her if she'd be interested in studying theology with
him.
Carr said she instantly replied in the affirmative. "And then,"
she said, "I went to the dictionary and looked up theology. We called it
religion then."
In a talk on the Common Ground Initiative, Archbishop Oscar H.
Lipscomb of Mobile, Ala., said the search for truth "should lead to respect for
others." He urged theologians to set aside defensiveness and "seek common
ground within the academy." Common Ground is a project started by the
late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin shortly before his death, as an effort to breach
divisions in the church.
Lipscomb said, "What I fear is a hardening of positions ... an
acrimony much like that which existed between Jesuits and Dominicans of old. Do
any of us look back on that era of mutual excommunication as a high point of
the church's history?" he asked.
He referred to heated controversies between Jesuits and Dominicans
in the 17th century over grace and free will.
Lipscomb's view was echoed by Sr. Mary Ann Donovan, installed here
as the new president of the society. "My hope for this society is that we would
mirror the larger church, which includes people of many different opinions,"
she said. "It would be a terrific loss if a society like this didn't have room
for a variety of voices." Donovan is a Sister of Charity and professor of
historical theology at Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, Calif.
Fr. Robert Imbelli, theology professor at Boston College, said
there is "no doubt" that the theological society, the leading organization of
U.S. Catholic theologians, "is 'liberal' in its theological orientation and its
ecclesial politics." Nevertheless, he said, "those of us who are perhaps more
conservative in those regards feel it's important that we continue to
participate."
Theologians at the meeting chose Mercy Sr. Margaret Farley of Yale
as president-elect. She will assume the presidency next year.
For full text of the society's resolution and paper "Tradition
and the Ordination of Women" see "Documents" on NCR's home page
http://www.natcath.org/ncr_onli.htm
National Catholic Reporter, June 20,
1997
|