With religion, TV misses the big picture
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR., NCR
Staff
Against the backdrop of what many are calling a new Great
Awakening in America -- a renewed spiritual hunger, perhaps fueled by
millennial stirrings, perhaps by the more prosaic fact that baby boomers are
reaching the stage of life where theyre picking out burial plots --
its probably not surprising that TV is infatuated with religion.
The most obvious measure of this interest is the seven prime-time
series that popped up in fall 1997 featuring either angels or ministers, with
more in development for 1998. But thats by no means the extent of it.
August will witness the launch of a seventh broadcast network,
PaxNet, which will compete with the majors -- ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox -- as well
as the other emerging networks, UPN and WB. PaxNet will feature family-oriented
drama, faith-and-values talk shows, specials from Focus on the
Family, and Christian mood music at night.
And on cable, religion is hotter than even cooking or country
music. The four major religiously themed cable networks -- Mother
Angelicas Eternal Word Television Network, Odyssey, the Trinity
Broadcasting Network and The Inspirational Network -- are growing, while
several other would-be networks are on the drawing board.
Whats striking amid all this activity is the disconnect
between whats on TV and whats in the culture. Scholars of religion
tell us Americans these days are spiritual seekers -- tourists with
respect to the sacred, in one famous formulation. We sample, we mix and
match -- its not unusual for an American to pray the rosary, wear a
healing crystal, read Deepak Chopra and practice Buddhist chant.
Moreover, Americas questers come in all theological shapes
and sizes. There are those who doubt, those who dissent and those who merely
dabble, in addition to the true believers.
But with a handful of notable exceptions, the new burst of TV
religion would give but faint indication of this diversity. Most programming
falls within a fairly narrow theological band, ranging from feel-good Christian
piety in prime time to the sharply conservative brand of Christianity found on
cable.
Understanding why thats the case raises a complicated set of
economic and theological questions, but at bottom it reduces to two
fundamentals: dollars and devotion. Shows need viewers, and cable outlets need
supporters. In both cases, conservative Christians have largely beaten other
religious constituencies to the punch.
Ratings juggernaut
In the fall of 1994, CBS debuted a little-heralded new hourlong
drama, Touched By An Angel. Widely seen in the industry as a long
shot, the show -- which features angels who lend assistance to people in
difficulty -- struggled in the ratings, but then found a home on Saturday night
alongside Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman and won a sufficient following
to get renewed. Later, it made the transition to TVs most-viewed night,
Sunday, and became a ratings juggernaut, regularly attracting an audience of
almost 18 million.
The prevailing wisdom had been that God and good ratings
were incompatible, said Paulist Fr. Ellwood Kieser, head of Paulist
Productions in Pacific Palisades, Calif. Touched By An Angel
changed all that.
Given the lure of the numbers generated by Touched By An
Angel, networks scrambled to put together shows with religious and/or
spiritual themes and green-lighted such programs already in development. Some,
like ABCs Teen Angel and CBSs The Promised
Land, a Touched spinoff, featured angels; others, including
Warner Brothers 7th Heaven, ABCs Soul Man
and Nothing Sacred, and UPNs Good News focused on
Christian ministers.
Many have subsequently struggled to find an audience. Teen
Angel has already been canceled, Nothing Sacred is on the
ropes, and rumors are beginning to circulate that Soul Man may be
next. Of the current crop, only The Promised Land and 7th
Heaven look like sure ratings winners.
Nevertheless, more spirituality is on the way for prime time. WB
is looking at developing a pilot for next fall called The
Confessor. The premise is that an avenging angel takes off during some
heavenly wars and descends to earth to help out people in need. Fox is
developing Brimstone, a drama about a tortured cop named Ezekiel
Stone dispatched by the devil to capture escapees from hell.
In addition, rumors of other prime-time possibilities with
religious themes -- both dramas and sitcoms -- are making the rounds in
Hollywood. Though rumors of new shows always float this time of year, the fact
that so many of them have spiritual overtones is another indication of the new
zeitgeist.
In terms of theological orientation, most of these shows are hard
to pin down. Soul Man, for example, is almost theologically mute,
using religion only as set dressing for a fairly conventional family-oriented
situation comedy -- sort of Cosby with a Roman collar.
Touched By An Angel, however, has a clear Christian
thrust. God is real, angels surround us, and simple Christian faith wins the
day. And because of its massive audience, Touched is by far the
most influential network treatment of religion.
Christian ambience
The show is produced by Martha Williamson, a Christian evangelical
who called the drama the gospel according to Martha during a chat
with Pat Robertson on the 700 Club when Touched first
aired. Williamson wanted to rally support among Robertsons constituency
to keep Touched going, and they responded in droves.
The Christian ambience about Touched is unmistakable.
During a 60 Minutes segment about the show last year, the camera
panned the table during a writers meeting, showing Bibles scattered
alongside the legal pads and scripts. Della Reese, one of the stars, is a
Baptist minister in Los Angeles in her spare time.
Williamson, along with people like Ken Wales, is part of a great
coming out of Christians in Hollywood. Wales was the driving force
behind Christy, another 1994 CBS drama that, like
Touched, had strong support among evangelicals, though it faltered
in the ratings.
Williamson used to write for Carol Burnett and Joan Rivers; Wales
was a vice-president at Disney. Both now find, in the new religion-friendly
Hollywood clime, that they can talk openly about their faith and even make
shows that reflect it.
But if Touched By An Angel is the gospel
according to Martha, many critics would also call it gospel
lite. Some detractors, among them many Christian conservatives, say the
angel motif is really more New Age than Christian; progressives fault the show
for depicting a pietistic faith free of social implications.
Paulist Kieser, who acknowledged finding Touched to be
preachy, soft and sudsy, nevertheless believes that it has a
pretty good fix on the gospel. The message is Gods unconditional love for
humanity, he said, arguing that Williamson goes about as far as she
thinks she can in prime time.
Whatever one makes of it, the ratings gained by Touched By
An Angel means that it sets the tone for most religiously themed content
on TV. Whether youre looking at 7th Heaven or Promised
Land, prime-time religion is most often pitched broadly, styled as
uplifting rather than critical -- and clearly crafted not to
challenge the basic religious assumptions of its core audience, moderate to
conservative Christians.
In that context, Nothing Sacred stands out as
remarkable, according to most critics, for its willingness to be specific and
to wrestle with doubt, dissent and failure.
Nothing Sacred goes against the traditional
sense of trying to attract a mass audience, said Henry Herx, head of the
Office for Film and Broadcasting for the U.S. bishops conference.
The media typically look at religion in the most inclusive way
possible.
Conventional wisdom
In bucking that conventional wisdom, Sacred has
struggled to find an audience, consistently finishing near the bottom of the
100-plus prime-time network programs. People connected to the show lay part of
the blame at the feet of ABC, which has moved Sacred around,
hesitated about giving it a late-evening time slot and pulled it off the air
for the entire month of February.
But the shows critical edge and progressive theological
orientation are admittedly not the normal network fare, and most observers
believe thats at least part of the problem. Within the last two weeks,
ABC canceled production of the last two episodes of Nothing Sacred,
a move widely seen as the beginning of the end.
Meanwhile, the feel-good spirit of most broadcast religion marches
on with the August launch of PaxNet. Its impresario is Lowell Bud
Paxson, founder of the Home Shopping Network and a TV mogul whose success has
come largely from the world of infomercials. Paxson told NCR that the new
network is an example of how his talent for TV is being used by the
Lord.
Initially Hollywood scoffed at Paxons announcement that he
would build a network, but that laughter has largely died out as hes
bought his way into 80 percent of the countrys broadcast markets. Paxson
now owns stations in the countrys top 20 markets, 45 of the top 50, and
73 in all (though some still await construction or regulatory clearance).
Given the Federal Communications Commissions must
carry rule, which forces cable operators to carry local broadcast
stations, PaxNet will reach the vast majority of TV households in the country
from Day 1. Currently Paxsons stations are carrying infomercials during
the day and Christian music at night.
The network will rely on family-oriented programming,
for the most part, to spread its message. There wont be any pulpit
kind of activity, Paxson said. Jesus only gave one sermon. The rest
of the time he told stories.
Paxson said one overriding question will guide programming
decisions at the network: If Hes going to be watching, what would
He want to watch?
To start with, He would be watching Touched By
An Angel, if the figures mean anything -- the network shelled out around
$950,000 per episode for more than 100 episodes. PaxNet will also air
Promised Land, as well as older material such as Eight is
Enough and Life Goes On. Christy, the short-lived
CBS drama based on a book long treasured in Christian evangelical circles, is
also part of the lineup.
The network has agreed to air programs produced by James
Dobsons Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian group that has
helped lead the anti-Disney boycott. Paxson said that around Easter hell
air some Bible-story movies and miniseries. At night, PaxNet will
feature Worship, a program in which Bible verses are scrolled
across the screen, set to music and scenes from nature.
Spokesperons caution that PaxNets programming schedule is
not set in stone. The overall goal, they say, is to generate
good feelings and good will. We want a very large, broad
audience.
At the same time, a spokesperson said, Paxson is a believer,
very strong in his Christian values. The network will reflect that streak
of Christian piety, but try not to be in your face about it.
In your face
If in your face Christianity is what you want, you
need cable. Religious cable is dominated by four national networks: Mother
Angelicas Eternal Word Television Network, carried by cable systems that
reach over 40 million households; the Trinity Broadcasting Network, based in
Tustin, Calif., that reaches 35 million homes; Odyssey, the interfaith cable
system based in New York, 30 million; and the Inspirational Network, out of
Charlotte, N.C., now in 11.6 million.
Just because a network is in a certain number of
homes, however, doesnt mean anybody actually watches it. Many programs on
religious networks are unrated; industry observers say the most-viewed
offerings probably attract audiences of less than a million. But however small,
those audiences can be quite devoted.
Of the four majors, three -- EWTN, TBN and Inspirational --
dont charge anything for local cable operators to carry their content,
relying upon income from supporters. And though there are important
differences, all three fall solidly on the conservative end of the religious
spectrum.
Trinity, which describes its offerings as positive Christian
programming, is best known for Praise the Lord, a sort of
Christian variety show, with pastors, musicians, movie stars and athletes
performing and talking about their faith. The network also owns and operates
Trinity Music City in Nashville, Tenn., a performance center that blends
Christian evangelism and country music. On-air fund drives provide much of
Trinitys revenue.
The Inspirational Network shows a mix of Christian-themed
programming. It sells air time to approximately 75 different churches and
ministries, and with few exceptions, programs stress personal witness and mix
evangelism with entertainment. The network also offers CCM-TV, a sort of MTV
for Christian music videos, and Branson Jam, a country music
showcase.
EWTN bills itself as a global Catholic network and can back up
that claim with the fact that it uploads its content to satellites that reach
Asia, Europe and Latin America in addition to the United States and Canada. Its
flagship program is Mother Angelica Live, which airs at 8 p.m. EST
every Tuesday and Wednesday and features the Poor Clare nuns conservative
views on issues both within and outside the Catholic church.
In this milieu, Odyssey stands out as the great exception to the
Christian rights domination of cable. The network is operated by an
interfaith consortium of 64 different faith groups, bringing together
Catholics, Protestants, Jews and Orthodox Christians. The programming lineup is
diverse, ranging from gospel-flavored country music to Sunday Mass from
Scranton, Pa.
Odyssey
Odyssey airs programs produced by each of its member churches; it
will broadcast The Field Afar this spring, for example, a 13-part
series on Maryknolls foreign missions. The networks prime-time
lineup is dominated by reruns of family-oriented dramas, such as Our
House, and G-rated movies.
Odyssey has a policy that forbids programming that attacks
or maligns any religious group, and it also does not engage in on-air
solicitation of funds. As a result, its forced to depend upon the same
business model that mainstream cable networks such as ESPN employ: charges for
content to cable systems and advertising sales.
To subscribers, it may seem that cable can offer an infinite
variety, so there should be room for all these channels -- why not just add
another couple of numbers at the upper end of the lineup? The truth, however,
is that the much-prophesied 500-channel cable universe is yet to arrive; today,
cable operators possess extremely limited bandwidth, meaning the vast majority
have about 55 to 85 channels to assign. They must make careful choices,
therefore, about what to carry and what to turn down.
As a result, the four religious networks engage in what one source
called trench warfare, slugging it out city by city, cable system
by cable system, fighting for the one or two slots a system is usually willing
to make available. In pitch meetings, where network representatives
make the case for their channel, they pull out all the stops -- demographic,
economic, theological and even political -- to beat out the competition.
Theyll attack each other, said one operator who
spoke to NCR on the condition he not be identified. Theyll
say that one channel doesnt have enough hard religion or that another is
too far-out, he said.
In this contest, each channel has certain advantages -- Odyssey
can claim to appeal to a wider audience, but EWTN and TBN can claim a fiercely
loyal group of viewers willing to make their preferences known.
The cable operator who spoke to NCR said that his system
made the decision to add EWTN after a well-orchestrated campaign of
letters and phone calls demanding the network. They werent going
away, he said. It was clear that our life was going to be pretty
difficult unless we added EWTN to our lineup.
Aside from the winnowing effect of such competition, why
isnt there more diversity on TV? On the network side, its not
difficult to answer -- programming must attract a mass audience and so the
least common denominator will ordinarily prevail. In that respect, prime-time
TV offers generic religion the same way it offers generic families and generic
workplaces.
Theres even a name for all this: least offensive
programming, or LOP, which emerged in the 1970s as a network
tactic to draw as wide an audience as possible by making shows intentionally
inoffensive and inclusive.
Theres also the simple fact that pious, unchallenging TV is
easier on the viewer. Black and white stuff is easier to take,
Kieser said. Ambivalence is harder to process. In Nothing
Sacred, Fr. Ray screws up, he uses bad judgment. Thats harder to
deal with than angels who never sin. Its much more
anxiety-ridden.
Finally, despite some criticism of Touched By An Angel
by the Christian right, the evangelical community rallied around the show when
it was struggling and had an impact on the ratings in a way that progressives
have so far not done for Nothing Sacred.
The show was saved by people who go to church, many of whom
didnt even really watch TV as a rule, said Nancy Udell, a PaxNet
spokesperson.
Privately, network sources say conservative Christians are much
more likely to support a show with a religious theme since they tend to spurn
programs like NYPD Blue or Friends. Progressive
believers, on the other hand, represent a more diffuse audience, in some ways
more likely to tap into one of those secular shows as something
with an explicitly religious flavor.
On the cable side, the home of niche programming, it may seem at
first blush that there should be room for everyone. But two theological
instincts help the Christian right succeed where others falter. The first is a
rejection of secular media, leading them to feel much more enthusiastic about
creating a subculture of religious programming.
A Church in the Modern World type of person
looks for elements in the culture to affirm, to be comfortable with, said
Odysseys interim president, Fr. Bob Bonnot. Those who see the world
as corrupt and want to flee it are more likely to create enclaves.
Conservatives are much more likely to be enthusiastic about
creating their own TV outlets, projecting their own messages, said Wade
Clark Roof of the University of California at Santa Barbara, who has studied
religion and the media. Liberals will probably find something to like in
whats already out there.
The second instinct is a belief in the need to evangelize, a
venture that for liberal Christians committed to ecumenism often seems, well,
unseemly. Liberals are less likely to see the need to talk about God on
television, said Margaret Miles at the Graduate Theological Union in
Berkeley, Calif.
Making converts
Indeed, progressive Christians have worked hard to develop
theologies in which members of other faith traditions and those with no
explicit faith are still understood as part of Gods family. In that
light, trying to make converts may seem not just a low priority, but a backward
step.
Conservatives see things differently. When you draw a harder
line around the truth, it seems much more important to you to get people on the
right side of that line, Kieser said. So you put your resources
into proselytizing people.
Miles, who studies religious imagery in film, said the liberal
impulse would more likely be to give the money to the poor or do
something else perceived to have more direct social benefits. Money spent
on TV, she says, would strike many progressive Christians as a waste of
resources.
Cable is an extraordinarily costly undertaking -- Odyssey told
NCR that its annual budget is around $25 million; in 1992, EWTN told
Newsday it took in that amount from donors each year. According to
industry sources, time on a single satellite can cost as much as $80,000 to
$100,000 per month. So, to some extent, the ability to get on cable turns on
the ability to raise money.
By most accounts, the Christian right is better at raising this
kind of money. For one thing, conservative causes generally have access to more
money than liberal ones, especially if one of the causes being preserved is
financial privilege.
The right wing, both politically and religiously, is closer
to the centers of power in this country and, hence, in a better position to
raise money, Miles said.
Moreover, Christian conservatives seem to have more chutzpah about
asking for dollars over the air. I would never go on the tube to raise
money for my own programs, Kieser said. It rubs against my Catholic
instincts about giving people the gospel without strings.
On EWTN, however, no such reservations are apparent, as Mother
Angelica reminds viewers almost every night to put the network between
your gas and electric bill. TBN also conducts on-air fund drives.
Thus, the combination of a theological commitment to proselytize
and access to the resources to pull it off have given the Christian right a
near-monopoly on religion on cable.
That doesnt mean that everyone sympathetic to the ends for
which Christian cable strives necessarily endorses its means. Paxson, for
example, told NCR that he thinks most Christian television today is
kind of sad.
His Utmost
You have to ask, is it our highest for His Utmost?
Paxson said. If you come to an honest conclusion, the answer would be no.
If Jesus were in control, he wouldnt do it this way.
Why not? They dont do it in such a way as to get
ratings, he said. That means they have to pay for time, and that in
turn means they have to raise money. I think the way they do it is fairly
unbiblical, because they dont present tithing in a proper way,
theyre always asking for more, he said.
In fact, Paxson said that most Christian networks seem to want TV
to do something for which its ill-equipped. TV cant be much
more than a planter of the seed, Paxson said. It cant
cultivate faith. The church has to do that. TV doesnt get you deeply
rooted in your faith.
Some of them [Christian channels] almost want to substitute
for the church, but its impossible. Sermons and preaching make bad TV,
and lets face it, God our heavenly father would be the best programmer
around.
Some Catholics are also dissatisfied with whats out there.
Retired Archbishop Philip Hannan has been building a TV presence for nine years
from his base at WLAE-TV in New Orleans, where he produces and cohosts
Focus, a news magazine distributed to Catholic media outlets across
the country. Hannan is wrapping up a documentary on the popes visit to
Cuba.
Hannan sees this work as the seminal stage of a new
national Catholic cable network, distributed via satellite, that will feature
news and entertainment along with inspirational content. Hes
aiming at the 18 to 30 age group and thinks hell be ready to go national
by the end of 1998.
Of Mother Angelica, Hannan said, God bless her. Her program
will continue, no doubt about it, but its strictly one kind of religion.
Well be much more broad.
A similar effort is underway at St. Pauls Parish in
Lessburg, Fla., which has aspirations to build what its calling the
Catholic Community Television Network. The parish wants to build a
state-of-the-art TV studio, then beam programming to a satellite for
distribution around the country and, perhaps, the world. Fr. John Giel, the
pastor, says the parish is at the stage of looking for corporations and
individuals to support us.
The idea is to present the Catholic faith as its really
lived, in communities that are vital and alive. As Giel put it, the
goal is to show were doing rather than were dying.
Does it matter?
Giel is careful not to knock potential competitor EWTN, saying
only that the full range of what it is to be Catholic is not
represented on existing cable networks. For most of us, we find
what it means to be a person of faith in a community, not in a monastery,
Giel said.
Perhaps Hannan or Giel or both will succeed. But in the end, is
there anything to be regretted about the lack of diversity in TV religion? Does
it really matter?
GTUs Miles thinks so. TV has essentially abdicated its
educative function, she said. We need to know more about religious
differences in America, about one anothers experiences and deepest
beliefs. But we dont get that, we get the Christian right.
To be fair, claims that the right has a stranglehold on TVs
religious imagery are undoubtedly overblown. Even setting aside Nothing
Sacred, the prime-time trend really seems to be in the direction of
spirituality as opposed to religion per se; shows about renegade
angels, for example, or demonic bounty hunters hardly seem drawn from a
Christian Coalition playbook.
Even more basically, the networks will offer what sells, and if
next year heresy is hot, dont be surprised to find The Manichean
Files on Fox.
But its also true that when prime-time programmers need to
present religion, they generally serve up an uncritical version of
conservative, Protestant Christianity. To some extent, thats because
evangelicals are a growing presence in Hollywood. Basically, its because
producers know that conservative Christians will rally around such shows in
ways other believers just wont.
On cable, religious programming is dominated by networks who,
buoyed by loyal followers willing to write checks, dont feel constrained
by the good manners of prime time. Here, the kind of Christianity that has
prospered is aggressive, sometimes angry and definitely short on sympathy for
what Mother Angelica once derided as the liberal church --
referring less to an institution than to a body of believers who dont
share her vision.
Perhaps a culture that relies on TV to mediate meaning gets just
what it deserves. But spiritual seekers who dont respond to soft-focus
piety in prime time or to the right-wing critique of church and world on cable
probably cant help feeling theyre getting less.
National Catholic Reporter, March 20,
1998
|