George tells ICEL Rome wants
changes
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff
Chicago Cardinal Francis George met a cool reception from the
governing board of the International Commission on English in the Liturgy when
he told the group Rome wants dramatic changes in the way ICEL does its work,
and that there is significant opposition within the American
bishops to ICEL.
In his first meeting as the official representative of the U.S.
bishops conference to ICEL, Georges criticism at the June 4 and 5
gathering brought a swift rebuke from the other eight bishops in attendance,
according to sources inside the meeting.
The Washington meeting of 11 bishop representatives from
conferences in which English is the principal language, as well as their
advisers and the ICEL staff, was closed to the press, but sources told
NCR that George said that, based on conversations with Archbishop Jorge
Medina Estévez, he knew that Rome is unhappy with ICEL. Medina is
prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the
Sacraments.
He said that the policies from Rome with respect to
liturgical translation have changed, that Rome now wants a much more
mechanical, word-for-word approach, one participant in the meeting told
NCR.
He also said that on behalf of the National Conference of
Catholic Bishops, he was here to say that there is great opposition within the
American bishops to the work of ICEL.
ICELs staff declined to comment for this report.
According to participants, the other eight bishops (two of the 11
bishops were absent) took exception to Georges remarks, suggesting that
he may be too new to ICEL to fully understand how it works. Sources said that
after the first day of the meeting, Archbishop Denis Hurley of Durban, South
Africa, wrote a statement recounting ICELs history and defending its
methods.
Hurleys text also reportedly called for a collegial approach
to resolving disputes between ICEL, its member bishops conferences and the Holy
See.
The other bishops spoke in various ways, but all basically
agreed with Hurley, a source told NCR. No one took up
Georges position.
Among other things, one source told NCR, the bishops
pointed out that the bulk of ICELs translations since the Second Vatican
Council have been approved by the member conferences -- including the U.S.
conference -- usually by overwhelming majorities.
In some cases, a participant said, those translations had been
approved by the very bishops in the room with George or their direct
predecessors.
George also informed the group that a new document being prepared
in Rome, probably to be issued by the Congregation for Divine Worship, will
affirm the Vaticans insistence on a formal, as opposed to dynamic,
approach to translation.
ICEL has long practiced the dynamic equivalency
approach to translation, taking some liberties with the original Latin to
produce a more fluid, accessible English version. That approach has come under
increasing attack from Rome, primarily for resulting in what curial officials
see as doctrinal irregularities.
Though the Congregation for Divine Worship under Archbishop Medina
is the usual conduit for reaction to liturgical translations, a source at the
June 4 and 5 meeting said it is clear that the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith, under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, has also played an important role
in pushing for a more literal approach.
A September 1997 letter from Medina to Archbishop Anthony Pilla,
president of the U.S. bishops conference, likewise alludes to a negative
judgment the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith had formed of
another ICEL translation.
No formal decisions were made at the ICEL board meeting as to how
to respond to Romes most recent actions, though sources said the bishops
hoped for a dialogue with Rome -- a dialogue that would observe ICELs
established processes, rather than Rome issuing mandates.
If the Holy See has problems with ICEL, bring them up,
one source said. But follow the process. George seemed to be saying that
whatever comes from Rome is just the law.
National Catholic Reporter, June 19,
1998
|