Women say bishops lose under new
rule
By DEBORAH HALTER
Special to the National Catholic Reporter
Women responding to Pope John Paul IIs recent apostolic
letter underscoring Romes intolerance of theological dissent say the
Vatican is threatening the authority of bishops worldwide and placing its
agencies between the papacy and the people.
The document changes the Code of Canon Law to provide punishment
for Catholics who question definitively held teaching.
Sr. Dianne Bergant, professor of Old Testament Studies and
director of the Joint Doctor of Ministry Program at Catholic Theological Union
in Chicago, said the local ordinary administering an oath based on the Code of
Canon Law is responsible for enforcing that oath. Some insist upon it,
and some do not, Bergant said. At ordination, whether priests take
the oath or not depends upon which bishop ordains them.
The recent document, however, applies sanctions against all of the
Christian faithful deemed by Rome to be in error. The bishops
are concerned about losing jurisdiction in their dioceses, Bergant, a
member of the Sisters of the Congregation of St. Agnes, said. In the past, the
pope has ensured enforcement, she said, by the appointments he
makes. The recent document even more tightly limits theological interpretation
and moves bishops further out into the ecclesial periphery, she said.
It seems bishops are constantly being surprised by
statements coming out in their names, said Andrea Johnson, national
coordinator of the Womens Ordination Conference in Fairfax, Va.
Im concerned about the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
and others using the power of the ordinary. These people are putting themselves
between the papacy and the ordinaries around the world. I do not think this is
our tradition.
While it bears down with more force against dissent, Ad Tuendam
Fidem (To Defend the Faith) introduces nothing new of
substance. It was the lengthy follow-up commentary by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger
of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that started getting
into issues, Johnson said.
Definitive teaching, Ratzinger wrote, is to be given
the same full and irrevocable assent that the faithful must give to
divinely revealed teaching. Whoever denies this, he
wrote, will no longer be in full communion with the Catholic
church. The commentary was much more specific than the document itself,
prompting Bergant to ask a question echoed by other women: Given the
popes state of health, how much of this was initiated by him? No doubt
this is the mans thinking, but whether this was initiated by him is a
different question.
Regardless of its source, the threat of being censured or
excommunicated is especially ominous for women because the cardinal mentioned
womens ordination as one of the errors among the faithful
that Rome is attempting to stem.
The pope didnt specify theologians or even
priests as the sources of error, Johnson said. He said
Christians. He said the faithful. And in his letter he
was not issue specific, but he alluded to womens issues.
Sr. Miriam Therese Winter, a Medical Mission Sister and professor
of Liturgy, Spirituality and Feminist Studies at Hartford Seminary, said,
There is a widespread and growing number of Catholics working for change
whose wisdom must at least be entertained. There is a stereotype that we who
wish for this kind of change are militant and out for ourselves, but nothing
could be further from the truth.
Catholics advocating church reform during a time of increasing
censure should be careful to avoid this stereotype and pull together, she said.
We can have individual voices, but we must stand together in a more
inclusive way.
Ruth Bertels, a columnist for the diocesan newspaper in Superior,
Wis., agreed. There are other ways you can say things -- with love versus
the law -- and get your point across, she said.
Bertels has written about such issues as a married priesthood and
the Vaticans pathological mindset against women, but she says
now shell have to come in the back door to say things.
The recent Vatican document, however, makes getting any point
across something of a Catch-22. Even if I say Im living within
their rules and accepting their boundaries because I respect their authority, I
cant just blot out my mind, Winter said. Yet if I dont
blot out my mind, Ill be cut off from the church. This is
heartbreaking.
In his commentary, Ratzinger called the New Testament the
singular witness of the first profession following Easter, when a
glorified Christ appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve. The
cardinal, however, omitted scriptural accounts of Jesus earlier
appearance to the women at the tomb and of Jesus instruction to Mary
Magdalene to carry the news to his disciples, who refused to believe that she
had seen the risen Christ.
We need to lovingly call into accountability a leadership
entrusted with guiding us, and to call into accountability an attitude so
vindictive that it is telling us not to speak, or even think, Winter
said.
She also said that a leadership entrusted with the churchs
care should reciprocate that trust. If I agree to accept their
boundaries, they must agree to know my suffering and to trust that God is
trying to say something through me.
But being a vessel through which God speaks is risky for Catholics
in the pew. Youve got to be careful about what you say and who
hears it, Bergant said, adding that the letters promise of
punishment will have the most serious impact on the people it directly
touches. One of those groups is Catholic women.
Women are becoming psychologically distant from the
institutional church, said Bertels, the columnist, claiming that her
peers in the over-50 age bracket have become increasingly alienated by Rome.
These women will stay from a sense of loyalty, she said, but younger, more
highly educated women are leaving.
The further from the church that women get psychologically,
the nearer they get to leaving it. Where are these women going to go? Many of
them will enter the diaconate and ordination in other churches. But the big
problem will be with women who walk out of the Catholic church into
oblivion, Bartels said.
All agree that the Vaticans insistence upon clamping down on
women is fueling support for womens issues.
When the Vatican shuts down public exchange and inquiry and
says it will rain just punishment on people who discuss issues they
dont want discussed, it garners support for those same issues, having the
opposite effect of what the Vatican is trying to do, Johnson said.
Winter said, We need a larger dialogue. We have a sacred
trust from Gods spirit to speak to issues critical to inclusion and
justice.
A sense of justice undergirds the womens various responses
to the document and commentary. This is a justice issue in the most
fundamental sense, because justice is about right relationship, said
Johnson. No one has a right to priesthood, man or woman, but all have a
right to have their call tested.
National Catholic Reporter, July 31,
1998
|