Opinion We can love the sinner, but morality demands we go on hating the
sin
By EUGENE KENNEDY
Nobody, however critical of President Clintons behavior,
could have wanted Judgment Day to come so sadly for him.
Bill Clinton is living out a familiar scenario of judgment that
has been used to terrify sinners into repentance for centuries. There, in the
glaring spotlight of a raucous Roman arena-like structure, individuals are
summoned to stand all alone while the eternal public address system announces
their every sin, slip and near moral miss to the jeering crowd.
Shame is the acid that eats away at the sinners pretense in
such a situation. Childish lies, arrogance and the devils own gift of
manipulation are burned off so that, as in movies in which characters are
morphed into various shapes, the person whose number is up and
whose time has come is reduced to a protoplasmic remnant of a once
over-projected self.
What people were asked to do in the ancient arena they are now
asked to do by pollsters. Thumbs up? Or thumbs down?
This has all happened to Clinton in real time instead of in
eternity. The records are not those kept by God.
They are rather the logs kept by the White House guards, the
tape-recordings of conversations, the evidence of things bought and sold and
promised in secret, and of deception by energetic, televised lies.
The high crimes and misdemeanors are of the earth in this drama.
This is not a preachers vision of hereafter but the public record of a
destiny no man could have knowingly designed for himself.
The gift of mercy is surely the one all of us will ask for at the
end. It is understandable that people are moved to grant it in some fashion
now. We would shrink from being part of this tableau that, tragically for
everyone, must go forward to repair the shattered public order and to unfurl
again the tattered banner of morality where it has not been raised on high for
a long time.
Americans are torn even more because over the last 30 years we
have made judgment one of the capital sins. Do not, for example, interfere with
your college roommate who is drugging or drinking his brain into Druid ruins.
Do not judge what is his choice. Nobody has a right to judge in a nation that
so strongly prizes the idea of choice.
The role of prophet has been relegated to the wild-eyed man on the
corner with the jagged letter sign, Repent. The End Is Near. Few
religious leaders don the vesture of judges. When one does, such as Pope John
Paul II, he is often dismissed with advice that he should stay in the Vatican
and out of our lives.
The only social critics with whom we seem comfortable are Siskel
and Ebert who, in fact, employ the old Coliseum signal, thumbs up or thumbs
down, as they review movies on television.
We are not moral, however, unless we can tell the difference
between right and wrong and tell that difference to a wide range of those to
whom we are linked by obligation -- our children, our students, our
parishioners, our patients or our employees.
To be mature enough to make sensible moral judgments distinguishes
us from moral cowards, snitches, or -- most dreaded category of all -- the
hapless do-gooders who, like errant cruise missiles, are often mistargeted and
do so much incidental damage.
The recovery of judgment in the spirit of Pope John XXIII -- to
hate the sin but still to love the sinner -- is essential if we are to restore
a moral voice to the millions of Americans who have been long denied it by the
hired guns of opinion-shaping and marketing strategies.
Judgment remains a building block of any moral life or any moral
community. Perhaps we can understand it better if we think of judgment on moral
wrong as like that of a physician making judgments on physical illness.
The physicians goal is to rid the body of infection and set
free the impulses of health. In mature moral judgment -- our obligation no
matter how the public relations legions urge us to take a pass -- we want to
restore the moral health of the community.
We are plagued by a sense that the healthy impulses of good people
are overwhelmed by those of a pathology-ridden culture. We can only restore
moral health by dropping our diffidence about making moral judgments. We can
still love the sinner, but we cannot afford to ignore the sin.
Eugene Kennedy, a longtime observer of the Roman Catholic
church, is professor emeritus of psychology at Loyola University in Chicago and
author most recently of My Brother Joseph, published by St. Martin
Press.
National Catholic Reporter, September 25,
1998
|