Krenn at the center of Austrian
strife
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff
Conventional wisdom had it that after the dramatic crescendo of
the Dialogue for Austria in late October, when a representative assembly of the
nations Catholics voted in overwhelming numbers for reform, calm would
return to the church in this beautiful Alpine nation.
Instead, Austrians find themselves cast in a national soap opera
surrounding the ultraconservative Bishop Kurt Krenn of the Sankt Pölten
diocese.
Over the past few years, Krenn has managed to make himself an
avatar of all that angers Austrians about their church. (Almost 80 percent of
the nations 8 million people are Catholic.) To progressives, Krenn is the
chief opponent of church reform; to most lay leaders, he represents clerical
arrogance; to most rank-and-file Catholics, hes infamous as a villain in
the Groër affair, a case involving sex abuse charges against
the former cardinal of Vienna. Krenn seemed to many to embody the churchs
strategy of denial and delay in response to those charges.
The latest row began in Rome during the mid-November ad
limina visit of the Austrian bishops, when Krenn said in response to
statements by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna that liars
should keep their mouths shut.
The remark triggered an avalanche of criticism. Most prominently,
Schönborns vicar general said on national television in early
December that a demand for removal would be logical if Krenn does
not change his ways.
On Dec. 8, a cross-section of priests and laypeople from across
Austria, including the heads of of the countrys Catholic lay councils,
Catholic Action, and the Pastoral Commission of Austria all called for
Krenns removal in a letter to the apostolic nuncio. They wrote that Krenn
had made a mockery of the church through his public speech. They
said the bishop had created increasing polarization.
After an extraordinary gathering Dec. 9, the nations bishops
issued a terse statement saying they were fully aware of the seriousness
of the situation but they did not want to act in haste. They indicated
they would talk again Jan. 4.
Few voices have spoken out in defense of Krenn. Among the bishops,
only Christian Werner of the military diocese has publicly backed him;
Krenns chief advocates among the laity are from the Freedom Party, a
far-right political movement with historical ties to ex-Nazis.
Krenn himself has not backed down, even threatening some of his
critics with penalties under canon law for inciting disobedience against a
bishop - a charge one canon lawyer in Vienna dismissed as
ridiculous in an interview with the Austrian Press Agency. People
are calling for Krenns removal from office, the canonist said, not
disobedience against him.
Krenn has so far rejected calls to resign, saying he is answerable
only to the pope. Schönborn has appealed to Rome for some kind of action.
Both men have ties to the highest levels at the Vatican, and the case rests
with the Congregation for Bishops.
Mandate not obscured
The Dialogue for Austria took place Oct. 23-26 in Salzburg.
Approximately 300 delegates from across the country debated church reform and
endorsed a platform that included the ordination of married men, women deacons,
local involvement in the selection of bishops, expanded roles for laity, and
more compassionate treatment of divorcees and homosexuals (NCR, Nov.
6).
The new leader of We Are Church, the countrys most prominent
reform group, said hes not worried that the melee surrounding Krenn might
obscure this mandate. On the contrary, it will speed up the process of
reform, Hubert Feichtlbauer said in a Dec. 6 telephone interview with
NCR.
If Krenn is forced to step down -- a result Feichtlbauer said is
now all but inevitable -- it will send a signal to other
conservative bishops not to carry your resistance too far or this could
happen to you.
The bishops had pledged in advance to carry the results of the
Dialogue with them to Rome, but conservatives began to distance themselves from
it afterwards. Auxiliary Bishop Andreas Laun of Salzburg said delegates had
approved resolutions that depart in serious ways from church
teaching, while Krenn was typically more blunt, calling what had happened
a revolt against God.
Schönborn, who had been in the hospital during the delegate
assembly, also voiced reservations. With respect to female deacons, for
example, he said he was not sure what Gods will is yet.
In Rome, John Paul gave the results a cold shoulder, warning
against democratization or the idea that truth can come from a church
from below.
Reformers said that John Pauls remarks were about what they
expected and that the real test of the Dialogues effectiveness will be
what happens back home on the ground, where they expect to find more pastoral
flexibility and openness to experimentation.
The bishops also presented the pope with a self-critical report
acknowledging mishandling of the charges against former cardinal of Vienna Hans
Hermann Groër. In 1995 accusations surfaced that Groër had sexually
molested minors and novice monks. As the affair dragged on over several years
without resolution, Catholics became increasingly disillusioned, and tens of
thousands left the church.
Krenn has all along been Groërs chief defender. Though
several bishops, including Schönborn, announced last year they were
morally certain Groër was guilty, Krenn suggested instead that
the accusers should examine their consciences.
The bishops new report was supposed to be confidential, but
it was quickly leaked. Krenn said in Rome that he rejected the report and that
it had been prepared without his knowledge or support.
Schönborn said that Krenn had been demonstrably
informed of the report. Objectively, what he said was simply not
correct, Schönborn said. That triggered Krenns comment about
liars keeping their mouths shut; Krenn also said, in response to
Schönborns call for some kind of sanction, that a president of a
bishops conference is not a nanny.
Though Krenn later claimed that the liars he had in view were
journalists and clerical functionaries, not Schönborn, he was unrepentant
in the face of demands for an apology. What should I do, walk around in
my underwear for six months? he asked.
The floodgates burst
Barely had Krenns initial remarks been reported when
Austrians started tripping over one another in the rush to denounce him. The
floodgates burst when Schönborns vicar general, Fr. Helmut
Schüller, said in a television interview that Krenn must either
adopt a constructive path, or a change in bishops would be a logical
demand. Schüller said priests are truly fed up with
Krenn.
Krenn accused Schüller of overstepping his bounds, but
Schüller in a subsequent interview said he was acting with the full
agreement of Cardinal Schönborn.
The nations theological deans, several abbots of Austrian
monasteries and representatives of many lay organizations all praised
Schüllers comments.
The special gathering of bishops on Dec. 9 did issue an indirect
rebuke of Krenn on this score: It expressed full confidence in the
official responsible for preparing the report Krenn had condemned.
While reform groups are calling for Krenns ouster, even many
conservatives have deserted him. As the Vienna-based newspaper Der
Standard noted in an editorial, Schönborn is himself a conservative,
but an enlightened conservative, while the paper called Krenn a
reactionary.
As the exchanges with Schönborn were unfolding, Krenn also
found himself fighting on another front. The abbot of the monastery of Geras,
located in Krenns diocese, suggested that Krenn had been involved in a
dirty tricks campaign designed to implicate the abbot in a financial scandal
involving misuse of public funds for construction at the monastery.
Abbot Joachim Angerer later backed off from suggesting that Krenn
was involved but said that he had received threatening letters and phone calls,
which Krenn had made possible by creating an atmosphere of hate.
Though Krenn has said he is not isolated and has
plenty of trust and support in his diocese, evidence for that claim
seems scant. Participants in an early December meeting of the Sankt Pölten
priests council reported a shouting match in which many priests
demanded that he resign, and Krenn responded with what a newspaper called his
familiar polemics.
On Dec. 6, two prominent priests in the Sankt Pölten diocese,
including the former head of the Cathedral Chapter, publicly called on Krenn to
step aside. The two said they acted out of concern for the sorrow of the
faithful entrusted to us.
Still defiant, Krenn gave an interview to an Italian newspaper in
which he called the Dialogue for Austria a failure and criticized
the theological understanding of its delegates. The contents of the interview
were reported in the Vienna-based Die Presse on Dec. 7.
Krenn also said that the era of the former cardinal of Vienna
Franz König had undercut the authority of the countrys bishops.
König, one of the leaders of the progressive group of bishops
at Vatican II, stepped down from the Vienna post in 1985.
Vaticanologists will be watching how the affair plays out in Rome,
given the personal connections both Schönborn and Krenn enjoy.
Schönborn was a student in Regensburg, Germany, in the 1970s under Joseph
Ratzinger -- later to become a cardinal and the churchs top doctrinal
official. Schönborn retains a close relationship with Ratzinger. It was
Schönborn whom Ratzinger tapped to head up the drafting of the
churchs new universal catechism.
When Krenn was an auxiliary bishop in Vienna, he forged a personal
friendship with Stanislaw Dziwisz, the popes personal secretary whom John
Paul recently made a bishop. Through Dziwisz, Krenn is said to have the
popes ear. Krenn has often boasted of meals shared with the pontiff.
Click the link below to access the international and Austrian
We Are Curch Web sites. When the NCR links to others sites, this is for
context and backgound purposes only and does not imply an affiliation or
endorsement. Use your browsers Back button to return to this
page.
- We Are Church (international
site)
http://www.we-are-church.org/
- Wir Sind Kirche (Austria, in
German)
http://www.we-are-church.org/at/
National Catholic Reporter, December 18,
1998
|