Solidarity vouchercalled a ploy
to exclude the poor
By LUIS ANGEL SAAVEDRA and
BARBARA J. FRASER Special to the National Catholic
Reporter Quito, Ecuador
Catholic bishops have split over economic measures adopted by
President Jamil Mahuads government, especially the so-called
solidarity voucher, which administration officials had originally
dubbed the poverty voucher.
The measures, announced scarcely a month after Mahuad took office,
quintupled the price of cooking gas and electricity by eliminating subsidies.
The cost of public transportation also increased, and the sucre, the Ecuadoran
currency, was devalued by 15 percent.
In a televised speech on Sept. 14, Mahuad, flanked by a colonial
crucifix and the Ecuadoran flag, said the Catholic church and evangelical
denominations would help distribute the vouchers, which provide the equivalent
of $15 monthly to mothers of minor children. In order to qualify, the women
must pledge before a priest or minister that they are poor. People over age 65
qualify for vouchers worth about $8 a month.
While Archbishop Mario Ruiz, president of the Ecuadoran Conference
of Bishops, agreed that the Catholic church would cooperate in the government
program, various bishops, including Alberto Luna Tobar of Cuenca, in the
south-central province of Azuay, and Jesus Martínez de Esquerecocha of
Babahoyo, in the province of Los Ríos, publicly rejected the vouchers,
saying they were not an effective way to counter the effects of the economic
measures on poor families. The bishops also said the plan was discriminatory,
because it forced low-income Ecuadorans to define themselves as poor, further
marginalizing them.
Luna Tobar called the voucher a government strategy designed to
exclude the poor from the economy of this country of 11.9 million people.
The churchs option for the poor must seek to eliminate
the causes of poverty by confronting the economic model that causes them, not
by participating in it, Luna Tobar said, adding that parishes in his
diocese would not distribute the vouchers. Because the program is a political
issue rather than a religious one, he said, it did not require obedience.
The neoliberal economic system is sinful, Luna Tobar
said. It is a social sin against groups of human beings, because it
deprives them of a dignified life and condemns them to poverty. If the church
wants to be faithful to its option for the poor, it must not attack the
symptoms of this system, but the structural causes.
Luna Tobar will reach the mandatory retirement age of 75 this
month and submit his resignation. Like the bishop, a large number of priests in
Azuay have directed their ministry toward marginalized groups, especially
indigenous people and migrants. Outspoken in criticizing neoliberal economic
policies as a cause of the regions severe poverty, these priests insist
that the next bishop share Luna Tobars views.
Bishop Antonio Arregui of Ibarra, secretary general of the
Ecuadoran Conference of Bishops, said Luna Tobars successor will be named
according to established procedures for consultation and denied that the
influential bishops replacement is causing a struggle among various
sectors of the church.
When he took office Aug. 10, Jamil Mahuad inherited a country on
the verge of economic collapse. Finance Minister Fidel Jaramillo said that
because of low oil prices, the global financial crisis and domestic financial
difficulties, Ecuador was nearly bankrupt. Losses of more than $2.6 billion
from last years El Niño phenomenon complicated the already bleak
economic outlook caused by a huge deficit in a budget that was based on oil
income of $16 per barrel. Oil prices, currently about $13 a barrel, fell as low
as $7 earlier in the year.
In order to increase revenues and reduce public spending, Mahuad
vowed to cut the number of public employees, the fleet of government vehicles
and the presidential security force. In a country whose external debt equals
$1,332 per person, while the annual per-capita income is $1,280, the government
also announced it would seek additional foreign loans.
Bankers and business leaders have backed Mahuads plan, but
unions, indigenous groups and womens organizations took to the streets in
early October to protest. The most violent protests occurred in the coastal
cities of Guayaquil and Esmeraldas, where three people died.
María Hernández, a grassroots activist and community
leader in Itchimbía, on the outskirts of Quito, said the economic
adjustment hits women especially hard.
No voucher can compensate for the economic measures,
Hernández said, adding that it costs $150 a month just to feed a family
of five in Quito, the capital, but a poor familys income is less than
$100. This is a policy of identifying poverty -- it has reached the point
of giving identity cards to poor people. Women are singled out for the poverty
identification card, because the mothers of children under 18 years of age are
the ones who receive the vouchers, she said.
The solidarity voucher, or poverty voucher, is a way to
avoid facing the real social problems, Luna Tobar said. Moreover,
the government has always given priority to the wealth voucher with
which it supports and protects the richest sectors of society.
Still, women are lining up to apply for the vouchers.
No one agrees with them, but all the women from poor
neighborhoods are signing up, Hernández said. We know it
isnt enough, we know its humiliating, but it is a little additional
income. We have been discussing this in womens groups, and we are
proposing that in the future the voucher become a right and that it increase
with the cost of living.
Protests against Mahuads economic measures had the greatest
effect in rural areas, where indigenous groups blocked the countrys main
highways. The administration sent troops to reopen the roads, and government
minister Ana Lucía Armijos called representatives of the indigenous
groups together to negotiate a settlement. The talks led to a government
agreement to allow indigenous communities to administer the solidarity voucher
funds, rather than distributing the money to individuals, and restore the
subsidy for bottled cooking gas in rural areas.
Protests in Quito were interrupted by Mayor Roque Sevillas
announcement that the volcano Pichincha, on the western edge of the city, was
expected to erupt. The demonstrations dissipated as residents scrambled to
prepare for a natural disaster, stockpiling gas masks, bottled water and canned
goods.
Officials now say the volcano is not an immediate menace. While
observers were hesitant to say the threatened eruption was a political ploy,
some commented that the volcanos rumblings were conveniently timed. With
the announcement of an imminent eruption, however, tourist arrivals to the
capital dropped by 50 percent, further depressing the local economy.
National Catholic Reporter, December 25,
1998
|