Column Papists abound, but whos keeping lists?
By TIM UNSWORTH
Having been raised in a list-keeping
church that once included a Catholic All-American Football Team in its almanac,
I still cant read an obituary without asking myself if the deceased was a
papist. I recall how proud we were in school to learn that Supreme Court
Justice Frank Murphy (1940-49) also ate fish on Friday. Today, the court has
three Catholics (Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas) and we
dont seem to care.
Bill Clinton has six Catholics in his cabinet but George Bush once
had eight, just one short of the total number of cabinet Catholics who served
from 1789 to 1940. Does it matter? Are the legal and administrative decisions
of these Catholics laced with holy water?
When the 100 U.S. senators stood individually to announce their
vote on the impeachment issue, I wondered if the scapulars once near to the
hearts of the Catholic members were making any difference. Twenty-five senators
claim Roman Catholic affiliation -- 14 Democrats and 11 Republicans. There was
a time when Catholic and Democrat were synonymous. Today, of the
153 Catholics in the Congress, 95 are Democrats and 58 are Republicans. Now,
Henry Hyde of Illinois and Bob Livingston of Louisiana, each with skid marks on
their souls, are Catholic Republicans. We own the Congress. But does it
matter?
Fifteen Catholic senators, including one Republican (Susan Collins
of Maine), voted no on impeachment. Eleven -- all Republicans -- voted to send
Bill back to Arkansas. Did they vote party or faith affiliation? How would 25
randomly selected bishops have voted on this issue? President Kennedy used to
say that bishops were Republicans and that nuns were Democrats. Was he
right?
* * *
Dont get too impatient with your local bishop. Consider the
alternative. Sure, I know of a few bishops whose porch light burned out years
ago. Not long ago, one who has lost all the dots on his dominoes declared that
all Catholics living in irregular marriages were adulterers. But how many Roman
Catholic bishops would proclaim that Tinky Winky, the purple Teletubby, is
gay?
The February issue of the National Liberty Journal, edited
and published by the Rev. Jerry Falwell, carried an article warning parents
that the rotund creature may be a gay role model because of his purple (a gay
color) suiting, the triangular antenna (a gay symbol) and his pocketbook
(actually a magic bag).
Now, weve got hundreds of purple clad (yikes!) ecclesiastics
out there who wear triangular hats (yike! yike!), but even the most paranoid of
them, who live out where the bus doesnt run, do not see gay Teletubbies
in their quiver of moral outrage.
(Still, it might be a good idea to appoint a Teletubby Task Force
in each parish. Paranoia needs our prayers and support.)
However, Falwell has now denied everything, proclaiming that his
readers never got it right. This is a recurring theme among church leaders.
Their simpleminded laity never get it quite right.
* * *
Its because the bishops are scared stiff that the
laity might come up with something they dont want, a good bishop
informed me as to why so many successors to Peter proclaim that the simple lay
folk never get it quite right.
Chicagos archbishop, Cardinal Francis George, appears to
feel that liberal Catholics in particular never get it quite right and that
liberal Catholicism just isnt muscular enough to foster the
self-surrender required for a good Christian marriage or a vocation to
religious life or the priesthood.
At least twice now he has proclaimed to listeners that liberal
Catholics are parasitical, i.e., people who grow and are fed by their fellow
Catholics while contributing nothing to the survival of the church. Parasites
habitually take advantage of the generosity of others without making any useful
return. George seems to feel that liberals are guilty of this sin.
Its just a guess, but I would suggest that the cardinal is
living in a diocese where the majority of practicing believers are liberal
parasites. The bulk of his priest and deacon corps appear to be making liberal
pastoral decisions. The teachers at every level, the scholars at the
theologates and universities, the religious education and catechumenate
volunteers, the parish and school councils, the staff involved in the complex
annulment process, the work of resigned priests in unofficial apostolates -- in
short, the vast majority of those who make the Chicago church work so well --
appear to be liberal parasites.
One observer estimated that only about 7 percent of involved
Catholics are conservatives, and most of them expend their best energies
yelling at the parasites. But the conservatives appear to be pulling the church
to the right, often with the support of their local prelate. Im afraid
that if the liberal parasites shook the dust from their feet, the cardinal
would be able to fit his diocese on a lighthouse.
But Im sure that I didnt get this right.
* * *
Then theres this business of the present state of
Catholicism at Catholic universities. It has been several years since John Paul
II brought out his pastoral letter From the Heart of the Church, in
which he planted the seeds for implementation of such protocols as having all
college presidents take an oath of loyalty to the local bishop and that
trustees of these institutions be practicing Catholics and that the credentials
of all theology teachers be checked for doctrinal correctness.
The bishops have booted this Vatican hot potato around for several
years now. They are supposed to vote on this issue at their November meeting in
Washington.
Here is the parasite in me again, I guess, but are we inching
closer to bar coding all Catholics? Do the bishops realize that their
discretion to preach the faith in their diocese is gradually being reduced to
that of a church usher? How long will it be before a bishop rises on the floor
of the annual meeting to impeach another bishop?
Frankly, as one who has visited numerous Catholic colleges and
universities, I havent found a lot of heresy in the air. But if
implementation of this pastoral letter goes along present lines, can
book-burning be far behind? Or will a bishops moral leadership become as
irrelevant as a senators?
* * *
I keep running into those pastoral decisions again. Im still
finding pastors willing to quietly bend the rules to find room in Peters
barque for one more soul.
Just the other day, I was chatting with a pastor when an associate
interrupted to inform us that he had a woman in the parish center who had made
an ash of her mother. She was crossing the country with her mothers
cremains in an urn. She wanted a eucharistic liturgy in each city where her
mother had kin.
Sure, the pastor said. Shes doing no harm.
Ill say the Mass if you dont want to do it.
Still another funeral involved a wonderful soul who had left the
Roman church, most likely because an impediment to her marriage could not be
set aside. But her funeral was held in a Catholic parish with an Episcopal
priest presiding and a female Episcopal priest at his side. Thats enough
to give a chancellor the vapors, but the local pastor had made a pastoral
decision, not a flabby ecumenical yes statement followed by an infinite series
of noes.
Finally, theres that pastor who recently hosted couples at a
Valentines Day liturgy in his parish. Now, among the most popular days in
the calendar, the feast of St. Valentine is no longer celebrated as a memorial
or feast in the liturgical calendar. The saint was impeached some years ago.
But the charismatic pastor made a pastoral decision, one that warmed the hearts
of some 300 faithful parasite couples. He knew the value of image over
substance.
There were two St. Valentines, it seems. One was a priest
reportedly beheaded in 269 for refusing to worship Roman gods. The second was
bishop of Terni, renowned for his gift of healing. (Some hold that there was
only one Valentine, but neither had a clear connection with courting couples.
Indeed, they both may have been as purely legendary as the contents of Tinky
Winkys purse, which may contain Valentines bones.)
The custom of exchanging love notes may date only to the Middle
Ages when it was widely believed that Feb. 14 marked the start of the mating
season for birds.
Whatever the case, God reward the pastor and his Catholic
imagination and his willingness to respond to needs. It reminds me of a Chicago
parish that recently sponsored a self-help group for children and adults with
attention deficit disorder. Parasitical ADD sufferers should not be impeached
or hidden in Tinky Winkys magic bag.
Tim Unsworth writes from Chicago where he is working on a book
of remedial theology. You may scratch his purple hide at
unsworth@megsinet.net
National Catholic Reporter, March 12,
1999
|