Vatican OKs Ex Corde norms
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff
As a next step in its campaign to safeguard the religious identity
of Catholic colleges and universities, the Vatican has approved a controversial
set of norms adopted by U.S. bishops in November. Those norms, which give
bishops more control over theologians, govern implementation in the United
States of John Paul IIs 1990 document Ex Corde Ecclesiae,
From the Heart of the Church.
The norms, the first Ex Corde regulations from any country
to receive Vatican approval, were the second attempt by the bishops to
implement the document. The first was rejected by Rome in 1997, in large part
because it sidestepped requiring theologians to seek a mandate, or license to
teach, from the local bishop (NCR, Dec. 3, 1999).
Representatives of the American theological community warn that a
number of difficult questions remain unresolved in the wake of the Vatican
action -- including who precisely is supposed to request a mandate, the
criteria by which a mandate will be granted and who will be making these
decisions.
The norms are slated to take effect May 3, 2001, and were returned
by Rome with only a handful of changes described by most observers as
non-substantive.
In addition to the mandate, the norms say that a college president
should be a Catholic who takes loyalty oaths prescribed by Rome, and that
to the extent possible a majority of trustees and faculty members
should be Catholics.
Approval is very, very good news, according to Bishop
John Leibrecht of Springfield-Cape Girardeau, Mo., chair of the bishops
committee charged with implementing Ex Corde. We are very pleased
that the Holy See has in effect accepted the document we sent over. He
said he believes the U.S. norms will become a model for other countries.
Leibrecht said he was especially pleased that the Vatican left
intact clauses such as to the extent possible and as much as
possible, which he said allow an institution and a bishop to look
at a norm and see how it might apply in their context.
Its a major recognition of the diversity of both our
state laws and the varying characteristics of our Catholic colleges and
universities, he said.
Leibrecht said that Bishop Joseph Fiorenza of Galveston, Texas,
president of the U.S. bishops conference, will create a new committee to
flesh out the details over the next year before the norms take effect.
Mercy Sr. Margaret Farley, president of the Catholic Theological
Society of America and a professor of ethics at Yale, said, I hope the
bishops will include on that committee theologians who are nominated by the
professional organizations and not just selected by the bishops
themselves.
I also hope the conversations dont happen just in the
committee, but take place in various dioceses across the country, Farley
said.
The Catholic Theological Society of Americas annual
convention opened June 8, just as news of Vatican approval broke. During the
session, a group working on proposals for implementing the new norms was due to
give a report.
Leibrecht said it will be up to Fiorenza to decide who will be
members of the committee.
Farley said another concern is that the discussion operates
not just on assumptions of good will, but leads to structures that cant
be used against the church or the universities by right-wing groups in this
country.
I hope the way the mandate is implemented will not provide
opportunities for self-appointed groups that monitor their version of
orthodoxy, Farley said. In part, she said, this may mean that bishops and
universities should agree to refrain from publicizing who has and has not
received a mandate.
Monika Hellwig, president of the Association of Catholic Colleges
and Universities, said several important questions confront the new committee.
They include who determines consequences at a given university if a theologian
opts not to request the mandate, and at what point a theologian will be
expected to apply.
Are new hires supposed to seek the mandate? Hellwig
asked. Most people havent published anything at this stage, so what
would the criteria be? Do they have to show a transcript or prove they went to
Catholic school? Or is it just whether theyre good boys and
girls?
Hellwig said a more logical point to request the mandate would be
promotion to full professor. Yet she said a subgroup of Leibrechts
committee chaired by Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia had previously
said the expectation would apply to new hires.
Fr. Richard McBrien, professor of theology at Notre Dame and a
critic of Ex Corde, said he draws consolation from language calling for
the bishops to take five years after the norms become effective to develop
procedures for evaluating their implementation. In effect, McBrien argued, this
means the bishops have six years before a final system has to be in place.
In six years well have a new pope with new priorities,
and this will all be less difficult, he said.
The Vatican made a handful of changes before approving the norms.
The only one that raised eyebrows is a new footnote specifying that while a
mandate is portable -- that is, the theologian does not have to
reapply upon moving to another diocese -- a local bishop always has the right
to ask the theologian to reapply.
Farley said the new footnote worries her. This shows that
so-called portability is not assured, she said.
On this point, Leibrecht disagreed. We as a conference are
saying this is portable, and now the Holy See has said its portable. If
an individual bishop wants to act otherwise, it would have to be a very
exceptional circumstance.
In a small word change that brought chuckles from some observers,
Vatican editors amended a phrase calling dialogues between bishops and colleges
graced moments. The line now reads more tentatively, saying that
such dialogues may be graced moments.
Leibrecht said he hopes discussion over the next year does not
revolve exclusively around the mandate.
If it becomes the horse and not the tail, thats not
good, he said. We need to see Ex Corde in the broader
context of the whole life of the university, its student life, its board, the
whole picture.
McBrien, however, predicted the norms will end up as sound and
fury signifying nothing. Either they will turn out to have no teeth, or
they will have teeth incapable of biting into the hard steel of academic
realities, he said.
The norms approved by the U.S. bishops describe the
mandate, or license to teach, as follows:
- It acknowledges that a theologian is a teacher
within the full communion with the Catholic church.
- It is not an authorization of a theologians
teaching. Theologians teach in virtue of their baptism and their competence,
not in the name of the bishop.
- It recognizes a theologian's responsibility to teach
authentic Catholic doctrine and to refrain from presenting as Catholic teaching
anything contrary to the church's magisterium.
Seeking the mandate is each theologians
responsibility. If a theologian does not do so, the university must determine
what further action may be taken in accordance with its own mission and
statutes. |
National Catholic Reporter, June 16,
2000
|