Theologians challenge bishops on the public
role of Catholicism
By PAMELA SCHAEFFER
NCR Staff San Jose, Calif.
Just a few days after getting the word that the Vatican had
approved new norms for Catholic colleges and universities, Catholic theologians
meeting here addressed a variety of controversial topics as they relate to the
public agenda of the church.
The delicacy of some of the issues, ranging from homosexuality to
the churchs public stand on abortion, was underscored by conflicts
looming between theologians and bishops as they prepare to implement those
norms. The thorniest of those, the topic of two meeting sessions, requires
theologians to ask for certification from bishops.
The theme for the convention, the annual meeting of the Catholic
Theological Society of America, was Catholicism and Public
Life.
In her presidential address, Mercy Sr. Margaret Farley, ethics
professor at Yale, praised U.S. bishops for their broad goals goals that, as
expressed by the bishops themselves, include providing a community of
conscience within the larger society and reflecting the churchs
commitment to the quest for the common good and the dignity of every
person.
Unfortunately, Farley said, the bishops themselves have created
two serious obstacles to their own credibility, undercutting even
their praiseworthy aims. Those obstacles, she said, are the bishops
overwhelming preoccupation with the issue of abortion, to the
diminishment of many other important issues on their public agenda, along with
the scandal of repression of thought and discourse within the
church itself.
In other major talks, Mary Hines of Emmanuel College, speaking on
internal church life in relation to its public role, also said the
churchs repression of dissent had undermined credibility. For example,
cutting off dialogue with such groups as Call to Action goes counter to
the freedom of the gospel and the spirit of Vatican II, she said.
Members of Call to Action, the Chicago-based organization calling
for modernization of church teaching in many areas, have been excommunicated in
the Lincoln, Neb., diocese.
As a way of boosting inclusion, Hines [proposed a Plenary
Council, engaging nonordained religious and lay persons as the new Code of
Canon Law allows. Hines, theology professor at Emmanuel College in Boston,
noted that that the Third Plenary Council in 1884 had less inclusive effect,
contributing to an increasing marginalization of the laity as a voice in
church affairs.]
Michael J. Perry, who holds a distinguished chair in law at Wake
Forest University, argued that faithful Catholics, while having a
responsibility to engage the magisteriums teaching in forming opinions on
such widely controversial subjects as same-sex marriages, are not obliged to
concur with that teaching in making political choices.
Leslie Griffin, who teaches law at Santa Clara University, a
Jesuit school, concurred. Catholics in democratic societies go awry, she said,
by assuming that their moral law, because it is derived from natural law,
should be universally applied. In truth, Griffin said, Catholics have much to
learn from the modern and even the post-modern world.
Perry, who formerly taught at Northwestern University, has written
five books, all published by Oxford University Press, including Religion in
Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives (1997). Perry writes often
about the relationship among religion, morality and politics.
The convention also featured two sessions where theologians voiced
concerns about the Vatican norms, particularly the certification process for
theologians. The norms were developed by the National Conference of Catholic
Bishops in response to the popes 1990 document Ex Corde Ecclesiae
(NCR, June 16). Farley said the board had approved plans for the
theological society to host regional discussions between bishops and
theologians during the coming year. As those discussions get underway, a
bishops committee will be developing strategies for putting the norms
into effect nationwide.
Among issues voiced:
- The norms call for theologians to be in full communion
with the church, yet some bishops may require oaths that go beyond the
creed. Some theologians feel strongly that full communion should be
presumed for theologians, thereby requiring no proof unless there is clear
evidence to the contrary.
- The mandatum -- that is, the bishops
certification -- could prompt graduate students and faculty to gravitate to
non-Catholic schools.
- Mandatums will diminish the prestige of theology faculty in
academia generally and at some institutions may become a negative factor in
granting tenure or promotion.
The bishops are not aware of all the problems, Farley
said. That is why we have been pleading for dialogue. In response
to Jesuit Fr. David Hollenbach of Boston College, an outspoken opponent of the
mandatum, Farley noted that, while some theologians regard it as a given,
others favor pressing bishops to rescind the requirement.
Thats not a closed issue with the board, nor in
regional discussions, she said.
As is the custom, Franciscan Fr. Kenneth Himes, who assumed the
societys top post at the end of the convention, selected its theme. Himes
said he did not expect the controversial nature of some of the talks to
interfere with the upcoming dialogue with U.S. bishops on the new Vatican
norms.
Himes said he is confident that bishops and theologians will be
able to separate the controversies evoked by convention speakers from the
discussions ahead on Ex Corde Ecclesiae. Himes, a professor of
moral theology at Washington Theological Union, noted that divergence of
opinion on the churchs public stance on issues not simply about
doctrines or matters of moral wisdom is to be expected and, provided
discussion is civil and respectful, even welcomed.
I think the airing of some of these legitimate differences
in regard to the church in the public square stands on its own merit, he
said.
Farley lamented in her presidential address that the bishops
strong emphasis on outlawing abortion is troubling to many people in the
context of the churchs opposition to contraceptive pills and devices.
Further, she said, the churchs many failures in upholding the rights and
dignity of women -- failures noted by Pope John Paul II himself in his March 12
Service Requesting Pardon -- have created a tremendous
credibility gap, not only with the general public but with American
Catholics.
Among criticisms of bishops relations with women, she cited
gratuitous condemnations of what church leaders call radical
feminism. However, she said, Documentation of failures in the
churchs relations to women has been provided for so long and from so many
sources ... that it is unnecessary for me to repeat it here.
Farley noted that, while the bishops have been concerned about
many other issues not only other life-and-death issues such as capital
punishment and euthanasia, but also racism, immigration and welfare reform it
is on abortion alone that bishops have made strong efforts to engage and
mobilize faithful Catholics. The title of Farleys talk was The
Church in the Public Forum: Scandal or Prophetic Witness.
Pamela Schaeffers e-mail address is
pschaeffer@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, June 30, 2000
[corrected 07/14/2000]
|