Cover
story Exorcism - Ancient ministry attracts new practitioners
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff Rome
At 73, Romes Fr. Gabriele
Amorth, bald and with a face whose deep crevices suggest wisdom, looks a bit
like Yoda, the diminutive sage who trained Luke Skywalker to be a Jedi Knight
in the popular Star Wars trilogy. Amorth, too, is keeper of an
ancient craft in a cosmic battle against evil.
Amorths apprentices, however, wield prayer books and holy
water rather than light sabers. Don Gabriele, as the priest is
known in Rome, is the official exorcist for the popes diocese, and the
leading apostle for what he and others say is a revival in the practice of
exorcism in the Western church.
The resurgence was evident at a weeklong mid-July conference in
Rome of the International Association of Exorcists, a group Amorth cofounded in
1993. Their first meeting seven years ago brought together just six Catholic
exorcists. This summer more than 200 exorcists and their lay assistants showed
up from all parts of the globe.
When I started this work, I could name most of the other
official exorcists in the Western church on my hands, said Fr. Rufus
Perea, a priest and exorcist of the Bombay, India, archdiocese who travels the
globe healing and praying over people for deliverance from demons. Now
there are hundreds of us.
The conference was off-limits to journalists, but several
participants agreed to sit down afterward with NCR. The conversations
provided a rare glimpse under this corner of the churchs big tent.
The practice of exorcism reaches deep into Catholic tradition. The
word comes from a Greek term meaning to pray or ask deeply, and
originally it had nothing to do with expelling demons. Jesus himself is
exorcised twice in the New Testament, once by the high priest
(Matthew 26:63) and once by the Gerasene demoniac (Luke 8:26-40). Both urge him
to do something using the Greek word exorkizo. In the early Christian
church, however, this term came to mean the practice of casting out evil
spirits. The practice has waxed and waned throughout Christian history. (See
accompanying stories, A bit of exorcist history and Revised
rite.)
Polls show that surprising numbers of people remain open to the
practice. A 1999 Atlanta Journal-Constitution survey concluded that
almost 50 percent of Americans believe people are sometimes inhabited by the
devil.
Fr. James Moroney, chief liturgist for the U.S. bishops
conference, told NCR it is impossible to verify whether there has been
growth in the number of exorcists in the United States, since the church does
not track how many exorcists local bishops appoint.
Team handled 25 cases last year
The most renowned American exorcist, Fr. James LaBar of the New
York archdiocese, believes the movement is gathering steam. LaBar, appointed by
the late Cardinal John J. OConnor of New York, is part of a five-person
team from that archdiocese that travels the country responding to exorcism
requests. The group handled more than 25 cases last year.
People know Cardinal OConnor has exorcists, and so
they call and we go, LaBar said on a 1999 radio program. LaBar, who was
unavailable for comment for this article, first came to prominence in 1991,
when he took part in a Palm Beach, Fla., exorcism that was videotaped and later
broadcast on ABCs 20/20.
LaBar said last year that his caseload is heavy in part because so
few other American bishops have named exorcists. Today if there are a
half-dozen dioceses that have an officially appointed exorcist that would be a
lot, he said. Theres a growing demand, and we dont have
the manpower to meet it.
Romes Amorth told NCR that when he began working as
an exorcist in 1986, there were fewer than 20 official exorcists in Italy. Now,
he said, there are more than 300 in the country.
Fueling the growth, observers here said, are two broad trends. The
first is a rebirth of traditional forms of belief and devotion within
Catholicism inspired by John Pauls papacy. The other is the Catholic
charismatic movement.
Perea, whose background is in the charismatic movement, told
NCR that the two impulses generally reinforce each other, but there are
tensions.
The first meeting of exorcists in 1990, he said, was composed
almost entirely of traditional exorcists wary of lay collaboration. They
didnt want to hear about any lay people practicing the ministry of
deliverance, he said, especially enthusiasts coming out of the
charismatic renewal.
Perea pushed for expanded lay involvement and for a détente
between the traditional exorcists and the charismatics. Today he heads a
companion association, in partnership with the exorcists group, for
priests and lay people who lack an official commission from a bishop but who
nevertheless offer informal prayers for deliverance.
Such practices cause some uneasiness in official circles. A 1985
letter to bishops from the Vaticans Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith specifies, that certain functions that are part of the exorcism rite are
restristricted to priests. Those include ordering the demon out or inquiring
about its identity.
Topics under discussion at the exorcists meeting in Rome
would have surprised, possibly even disturbed, Catholics who learn about church
affairs largely from Sunday homilies or mainstream journals.
Hot debate, for example, surrounded the question of whether the
souls of people who die in mortal sin are capable of possessing the living.
Attendees were also interested in questions of technique, something Amorth
covered extensively in his 1990 book An Exorcist Tells His Story. There
he describes forcing demons to allow people to vomit up objects such as locks
of hair and wooden dolls (the results of sorcery), and writes that sometimes
one can detect the presence of a demon in people by secretly preparing their
food using holy water and watching their reaction.
Such notions obviously strain credulity in many quarters, but
Amorth, feisty and razor-sharp, makes no apologies: The unbelieving
Catholic world may laugh at my assertions, he said, but he knows what
hes seen.
An unbroken tradition
Fr. Gregory Planchak, a priest of the Greek Catholic rite in the
Ukraine, said that Eastern Christianity in both its Orthodox and Catholic forms
has an unbroken tradition of exorcism. We never stopped, unlike the
church in the West, which virtually abandoned the practice 200 years ago,
he said. Planchak joked that skepticism is largely restricted to some
priests who finished their theology in Rome.
Planchak said Western theologians have a harder time with demonic
phenomena than the Eastern Orthodox theologians do. Eastern theology
comes from spiritual experience, including the visions of saints. It is
mystical theology, so its easier to account for this sort of thing,
he said.
Such assertions were strongly rejected by Jesuit Fr. Robert Taft,
vice-rector of the Pontifical Oriental Institute and a frequent adviser to the
Vatican on Eastern churches. Thats nonsense, Taft said
bluntly. Its part of this Eastern rap that they have preserved what
the West has lost. Taft argues that in educated circles in both East and
West the use of exorcism went into decline in the last 200 years, while in
areas where popular religious belief remains strong, so too does exorcism.
There are places in Greece where they use the ritual for the
anointing of the sick if they see a snake in the house, Taft said. He
referred to the connection in Mediterranean folklore between snakes and the
demons that cause illness. But it happens in the West, too. Its
just not true to say that it died out.
Like most of his exorcist colleagues, Perea said that it was a
spiritual experience, rather than intellectual conviction, that led him into
this work. In 1976, two women came to him complaining of possession, and he
began to pray for them.
One of the two women, a very religious person who always had
a rosary in her hand, was flung to the ground, Perea said. The evil
one began to speak, I could see the eyes full of hatred. This woman wanted to
jump at me to catch my throat, asking me why have you come here, telling me to
go back to Bombay. I began to pray in tongues. Suddenly her face changed, it
became an angelic face. Her hands, which had been like claws wanting to hurt
me, were now raised in praise.
Planchak said witnessing such an exorcism can cure theological
skepticism. Once you have seen it with your own eyes, you will never be
the same, he said.
Exorcists are aware that many people wonder if mental illness, or
even fakery, is the real cause of possession.
Fr. Perea of Bombay, said that when a suffering person is
presented, he simply begins to pray. I have no time to make this
distinction, he said. Planchak said that if he harbors, he would proceed
if his fellow priests and people concur that it is a genuine case of possession
or oppression.
Like any other professional group, the exorcists have their own
running debates. One turns on whether spiritual beings other than demons can
hijack souls. Planchak thinks so.
Once a girl came to me for confession, but during confession
it started to get bad, and I began to pray over her, he said. There
was a manifestation of a spirit, so I started the prayer of exorcism.
I asked the demon what its name was, and he replied,
Viktor. It was the first time I had heard anything like this, so I
asked him, who are you? With difficulty he began talking about himself. He said
he had been married to another woman during his life, but he loved this girl
too much, and eventually the girl and Viktor slept together. After that she
rejected him, and he was suffering. Finally, he killed himself and then entered
the girl. He asked me not to put him out, saying, I love her, and she is
mine. Then I prayed for maybe 10 minutes, and he was gone.
All possession by demons
Amorth rejects such conjecture. He insists that all possession is
done by demons, and that in such cases as Viktor, this is simply a
demon lying about its identity.
Exorcists also differ on how long it takes to liberate someone.
Perea says it is usually a matter of minutes, though he grants that the most
difficult cases can take longer. Amorth, however, warns against a quick fix.
I am very content when a case of only medium gravity is dealt with after
four or five years of coming once a week, he said.
Despite the conceptual gulf that sometimes separates exorcists
from other constituencies in the church, there is at least one point of common
ground: occasional frustration with bishops perceived as unsupportive.
Jesus gave a very precise mandate to the apostles: preach
the gospel, cast out demons and heal the sick. Every bishop has the
responsibility to do these three things, Amorth said. If they
dont do it, they betray the gospel.
I am glad I am not a confessor to bishops, Amorth said
defiantly, because I would absolve very few of them
I say to the
bishops: You are the successors to the apostles, but you are not their
followers.
Amorth has also blamed Western theologians for a decline in
exorcism. Yet several leading American Catholic theologians told NCR
they take the idea seriously.
I think we too easily demonize persons and
actions, said Mercy Sr. Margaret Farley of Yale, former president of the
Catholic Theological Society of America. Still, I do think that forces of
evil -- both external, that is, societal, and internal -- are real in our
experience.
There is such a growing awareness of the spiritual among
ordinary folk, belief in angels, miracles and so on, that believing that evil
can be incarnated or possess someone is not wholly unthinkable, said
Capuchin Fr. Ed Foley of Chicagos Catholic Theological Union.
Jesuit Fr. Tom Reese, editor of America magazine, seemed to
sum up the dominant reaction. I am not into exorcisms or evil
spirits, he said, but I also recall Shakespeare: There are
more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
The e-mail address for John L. Allen Jr. is
jallen@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, September 1,
2000
|