Ratzingers latest: Dont call us
sister church
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff Rome
A new Vatican assertion that the Catholic church cannot be
anyones sister church because it is the mother of
individual churches represents a potentially serious blow to relations between
Catholicism and other branches of Christianity, according to several ecumenical
experts.
The most direct impact will be felt in the Catholic/Orthodox
dialogue, observers said, where the term sister church is most
common, but the underlying thinking has implications for the full range of
conversations between Catholics and other Christian bodies.
Many Orthodox will see this as a kind of proof that there
never was any real intent of following through on improved relations, Fr.
Leonid Kishkovsky, a New York-based Orthodox priest involved in dialogue with
Catholicism, told NCR. They will think that use of the phrase
sister church, which went on happily enough in an earlier stage of
our dialogue, was possibly deceptive.
Bishops around the world have been asked to attend to the new
document, titled a Note on the Expression Sister Churches.
Sent to presidents of bishops conferences on June 30 by Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger, the Vaticans top doctrinal official, the document is
presented as a correction of ambiguities in certain publications and in
the writings of some theologians, especially the habit of referring to
the Catholic church as a sister of some other Christian body, or
using the phrase our two churches with respect to Catholicism and
another group.
Ironically, the term sister church was first used by a
pope, Pope Paul VI, who referred to Anglicans as a sister church in
1970. Pope John Paul II has endorsed the concept, referring to Eastern and
Western Christianity as the two lungs of the church.
Properly speaking, the new document says, Catholicism cannot be a
sister of another Christian body such as the Orthodox because it implies
a plurality
on the level of the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic church
confessed in the Creed, whose real existence is thus obscured.
The one, holy, catholic and apostolic universal church is
not sister but mother of all the particular churches, the
document says.
Several observers predicted the document could have wide
ecumenical repercussions.
Tom Best of the Geneva-based World Council of Churches told
NCR that while the vocabulary of sister churches is
associated with the Catholic/Orthodox dialogue, the suggestion that Catholicism
best represents the one church of Christ is likely to irk other
Christian bodies.
We would hope for a certain ecumenical discretion,
said Best. We would encourage people not to use language that seems to
preclude open relationships.
Robert Edgar of the U.S.-based National Council of Churches, a
federation of Christian denominations, said the Vatican sensitivity over
sister churches illustrates the need for new relationships
on the basis of equality and our mutual belonging to one body.
Perhaps it would be best to refer to each other as
colleagues in Christ, he said.
Local Catholic churches, according to the document, can be sisters
of non-Catholic churches that have preserved a valid episcopate and
Eucharist, the document says, but Catholicism as such may not.
This is not merely a question of terminology, but above all
of respecting a basic truth of the Catholic faith: that of the unicity of the
church of Jesus Christ. In fact, there is but a single church, and therefore
the plural term churches can only refer to particular
churches.
Ratzingers office did not respond to an NCR request
for comment.
A cover letter from Ratzinger adds that use of sister
church to describe the ties between Roman Catholicism and the Anglican
Communion, as well as non-Catholic ecclesial communities, is also
improper.
That is just how Pope Paul VI used the term on Oct. 25, 1970.
During the canonization of a group of English martyrs, the pope referred in his
homily to the Anglican church as an ever-beloved sister in the one
authentic communion of the family of Christ.
The retraction implied by Ratzingers letter irritated some
Anglicans.
So Paul VI was in error, was he? asked the Rev. Barry
Norris, an Anglican priest involved in ecumenical dialogue in England.
What other term do you use? I mean, either youre sister churches or
youre not. If youre not, then its just the Catholics and the
heretics.
As recently as this summer, some Anglican and Roman Catholic
officials used the term sister churches to describe their ties. The
Anglican bishop of Windsor, Michael Scott Joynt, and the Catholic archbishop of
Florence, Cardinal Silvano Piovanelli, signed an agreement for a twinning
relationship on July 14 that states: The churches of the Anglican
Communion and the Roman Catholic church are able as sister churches to bring
shared gifts to their joint mission to the world.
Norris said, I think Anglicans have always accepted the term
sister church in the sense Paul VI meant it, as a friendly thing to
call one another. I do believe that there is an acceptance of one another today
that is brotherly and sisterly. I think people will be exceedingly put out to
hear that at the universal level such language is no longer
permitted.
As for the Orthodox, several observers noted that leaders of the
various branches are themselves not in agreement about use of the term
sister church. Some conservatives inside Orthodoxy argue, much as
conservative Catholics do, that it weakens their claim to embodying the lone
church of Christ.
Jesuit Fr. Robert Taft, an expert in Eastern Christian churches
who teaches at Romes Gregorian University, told NCR that some
Orthodox churches reject the concept of being anyones sister
church.
They do not conceive of sacraments as operative outside
Orthodoxy, and hence Catholic sacraments are not valid and they
rebaptize Catholics who convert, Taft said. What they fail to
realize is that the sister churches idea is the only theological basis for us
not being obliged to proselytize them.
Fr. John Matusiak, communications director for the Orthodox Church
in America, said, Some Orthodox do reject the term, because it makes no
one particular church the church of Christ. If the church is one, then you
cant have sister churches, which implies there are at least two
churches, he said.
Matusiak also noted that some voices within Orthodoxy have long
objected to Pope John Paul IIs frequent habit of referring to Eastern and
Western Christianity as the two lungs of the church. To some,
that makes it sound like Orthodoxy is only half of the church, he
said.
Matusiak said that other Orthodox leaders dont see a
problem with being a sister church.
The concept of Catholicism and Orthodoxy as sister churches became
prominent, according to several observers, at the time of a 1993 agreement
known as the Balamand Statement. In it, Catholic officials agreed
to refrain from seeking converts in predominantly Orthodox territories, and the
Orthodox agreed to recognize the legitimacy of the so-called uniate
churches 21 Christian groups that utilize Orthodox liturgies but profess
allegiance to Rome.
Not all the Orthodox bodies were represented at the negotiations
leading to the Balamand Statement, and some rejected it. Some Orthodox leaders
also believe Rome failed to honor its end of the bargain, pointing to
evangelizing activities in Russia and elsewhere by new Catholic movements such
as the Neocatechumenate.
These tensions were reflected in the most recent Catholic/Orthodox
dialogue, which took place in Emmitsburg, Md., and which Kishkovsky said
produced only a description of the present impasse rather than a
breakthrough.
Still, a North American Orthodox-Catholic Theological
Consultation, which met in Brookline, Mass., June 1, was able to find enough
common ground to invoke the term now discouraged by the Vatican:
We are convinced that a unique relationship exists between
our churches in spite of our division, its statement said. It is
for this very reason that in recent times the Catholic and Orthodox churches
have been described as sister churches.
The new Vatican document is not the first time Ratzinger has
voiced reservations about the term sister church. In June 1997, he
appeared at a news conference to promote a new book on ecumenism by Italian
theologian Fr. Nicola Bux, who asserted that sister church is a
meaningless phrase unless one understands the mother church is in
Rome.
Ratzingers letter accompanying the new document says that
while the ban on use of sister church with respect to Catholicism
as a whole is authoritative and binding, the document will not be
published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, the official compendium of
Vatican legislation. Observers say this means it carries less official weight,
though given Ratzingers signature it is unlikely to be ignored.
Not everyone, however, was prepared to declare a crisis. Harvard
theologian and veteran ecumenical expert Harvey Cox downplayed the potential
significance of the document. I think Protestants have gotten used to
Roman Catholic claims about some unique status and simply take them with a
grain of salt, he told NCR.
The full text of Note on the Expression Sister
Churches. is available on the NCR Web site:
http://www.natcath.com/NCR_Online/documents/index.htm.
The e-mail address for John L. Allen Jr. is
jallen@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, September 8,
2000
|