García: These are matters of
opinion
By MARIANNE M. ARMSHAW
Special to the National Catholic Reporter West Palm
Beach, Fla.
Ex-Gen. José Guillermo
García made history merely by taking the witness stand in a Florida
federal courtroom Oct.18.
The civil lawsuit that charges García and a former
subordinate with responsibility for the 1980 deaths of four American
missionaries -- three nuns and a lay volunteer -- marks the first time a top
Salvadoran military leader answered questions under oath in a U.S. courtroom
about roles in the bloody Salvadoran civil war that left 75,000 dead.
The suit, brought by the families of the four dead women, alleges
that García and his former subordinate, Gen. Carlos Eugenio Vides
Casanova, bear responsibility for the deaths because they allowed their troops
to torture and murder with impunity. The lawsuit seeks compensation, but for
the families, a deeper hope is that the generals will be deported.
García and Casanova have lived quietly in retirement in
Florida since 1989. The U.S. government has granted García political
asylum.
Since Oct. 11, the jury has listened spellbound as witnesses
recreated the Salvadoran militarys horrifying reign of terror. Focusing
on the period from 1980 to 81, witnesses told of death squads murdering
with impunity, wholesale massacres of unarmed campesinos, of torture, rape and
kidnapping perpetrated by the extreme right wing, a synonym for the military.
Mutilated bodies littering the roadside became a common sight.
Armed men raided hospitals, machine-gunning patients in their beds and
murdering doctors and nurses. The military published a death list of political
opponents, academics, priests and others marked as left-wing sympathizers. The
families lawyers have revealed a paper trail of evidence. It includes
several international reports blaming the Salvadoran military for 85 to 95
percent of the deaths during the bloody civil war.
Testimony from Robert White, the Carter administrations
ambassador to El Salvador at the time the four women were murdered, seemed to
conjure up the ghosts of so many murdered in 1980. That year brought the March
murder of Archbishop Oscar Romero and ended with the Dec. 2 killings that have
landed the generals in court: the deaths of Maryknoll Srs. Ita Ford and Maura
Clarke, Ursuline Sr. Dorothy Kazel and lay volunteer Jean Donovan.
White had repeatedly tried to convince García to halt the
militarys abuses and had warned the State Department that continued
military brutality toward the people would radicalize them, paving the way for
a leftist takeover.
García claimed he never heard about any of this. In more
than six hours on the witness stand, García contradicted himself several
times, giving long-winded, often obscure answers when plaintiffs attorney
Robert Kerrigan peppered him with questions.
No, the American missionary women were not subversives and should
not have been killed, he said. He insisted, however, there was nothing he could
have done to prevent it. He never heard of torture taking place, or
kidnappings. He had never seen anyone murdered.
He admitted that the military had committed human rights abuses,
and that he gave no orders to stop the killing or to investigate a single
incident of a civilian death at the hands of the military.
Why didnt you investigate? Kerrigan asked
repeatedly.
I didnt have the means.
I lacked the
personnel, said García, who commanded 16,000 men and was El
Salvadors top cop.
García, 67, served as minister of defense from October
1979, when a new government supposedly dedicated to democracy took office,
until April 1983. He headed the armed forces as well as El Salvadors
internal security apparatus.
Former Gen. Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova served directly under
García and headed the countrys notorious national guard. Both
generals deny any wrongdoing. Defense attorney Kurt Klaus was expected to
follow the prosecutions questioning with opening statements and to mount
a defense.
García, a short, slight figure whose jet black hair is
winged with silver, often responded, I dont remember, or
There was a condition of war, when asked about specific cases of
human rights abuse.
At times, the exchange between lawyer and defendant took on a
through the looking-glass quality, as García responded that
the massacres Kerrigan mentioned could not have occurred, since
massacres were illegal and he, as head of the military, could never have
accepted such an action.
To understand them that way would be to accept illegal acts
on the part of the army, Garcia said.
Kerrigan questioned García closely about notorious,
well-documented massacres at Mozote, where 600 unarmed country people, most of
them children, were shot to death by soldiers using high-powered rifles.
Kerrigan also questioned him about Sumpul River, where soldiers from Honduras
and El Salvador killed hundreds of civilians, using military helicopters to
strafe them from the air and by bayoneting infants.
For me, as minister of defense, the information I received
was that [Mozote] was a military operation. It was not presented [to me] as it
is here, García said.
He was confident any orders he issued would be followed,
García testified, but never ordered his troops to stop shooting
teachers, government opponents, trade union members, religious or medical
personnel -- all targeted by the military and routinely found dead on the road
sides.
It was not necessary. That was the obligation of the armed
forces not to kill or persecute, García said.
He later contradicted himself. I knew there were killings,
but they couldnt be proven, he said.
He stressed repeatedly that, while individual abuses occurred, he
never ordered them. Nor did he investigate alleged war crimes reported in the
press since the information needed to be confirmed and authorized.
Such steps, he said, were difficult in time of war.
Though he commanded 16,000 troops and received millions of dollars
in U.S. military aid each year, García never appointed anyone to
investigate alleged atrocities because he lacked the means
the
personnel.
U.S. ambassadors, including White and Dean Hinton, repeatedly
warned García that the military was responsible for wholesale violence
against civilians and asked the general to control his troops, according to
State Department cables entered as evidence earlier in the trial. Yet
García flatly denied ever discussing the subjects with either
ambassador.
Some of the most damning testimony came from a U.S. brigadier
generals 1981 report sharply critical of the Salvadoran military. The
report said the military protected its own by ignoring,
suppressing, covering and covering up unprofessional acts. The report
warned of a predisposition for violence and an acceptance of
and numbness to the use of force. The military would not recognize
right-wing extremism as a threat, according the report.
These are matters of opinion, García said.
The relatives of the murdered women find Garcías
testimony incredible.
He must have been the only human being in El Salvador who
didnt know about the thousands of mutilated bodies found on the roads
between 1980 and 1981, said Bill Ford, older brother of the murdered Ita
Ford.
Plaintiffs attorneys were expected to call Vides Casanova
Oct. 19, as NCR went to press.
District Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley has told the jury that the case
could be in their hands by Oct. 26.
National Catholic Reporter, October 27,
2000
|