Viewpoint Why I dare to not vote for war-minded
candidates
By COLMAN McCARTHY
As in every election cycle,
patriotic calls are going out to the citizenry to exercise the sacred right to
vote. The bromides range from the old standards -- voting is a civic duty,
voting is a privilege -- to pietistic guff: Brave men have died to keep
democracy alive. How dare anyone not vote.
I dare. I look forward to Nov. 7 and the deep joy of not voting.
As a pacifist, and with increasing leanings toward the philosophy of nonviolent
anarchism, I stand with that small band of conscientious non-voters ever wary
of presidents and vice-presidents who take an oath of office by which they
swear to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.
But this is a document written by war-minded men who spelled out
their militaristic beliefs with no ambiguity in Article l, Sec. 8: Congress
shall have the power to declare war and raise money for the armies and
navies, with the president being the Commander in Chief.
All Congresses and presidents since have feverishly fulfilled
their oath. Voting means supporting politicians who spend public money to
finance soldiers to kill people whose behavior or thinking the U.S. government
disapproves. A vote for any national candidate is a vote, first, for death,
and, second, for the monstrosity of a military budget that totals $305 billion
this year (or $700 million a day, $8,000 a second, about $4 a day per person),
which is 49 percent of every federal tax dollar and is more than 22 times as
large as the combined military budgets of the nations seven alleged
enemies.
Martin Luther Kings 1967 judgment still holds: The
greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is our] own
government.
How violent? Historian William Blum has devised the Quick
Political Scholastic Aptitude Test (QPSAT). He lists the countries that the
United States has bombed since the end of World War II: China 1945-46, Korea
1950-53, China 1950-53, Guatemala 1954, Indonesia 1958, Cuba 1959-60, Guatemala
1960, Congo 1964, Peru 1965, Laos 1964-73, Vietnam 1961-73, Cambodia 1967-70,
Guatemala 1967-69, Grenada 1983, Libya 1986, El Salvador 1980s, Nicaragua
1980s, Panama 1989, Iraq 1991-2000, Sudan 1998, Afghanistan 1998, Yugoslavia
1999.
The test: As a result of this half-century of interventionary
death-dealing, how many democratic governments, respectful of civil liberties
and human rights, were created? Choose one of the following: (a) 0 (b) zero (c)
none (d) not a one (e) a whole number between -1 and +1.
When telling my voting friends that I cant in conscience
vote and that people who do vote unwittingly endorse killing as a way of
settling differences, Im chided, denounced or damned for being a
misguided purist, an addled idealist or a dyspeptic lefty that only the editors
of the National Catholic Reporter -- suspect subversives themselves --
would give space to.
Perhaps my friends are right. But first Id like to see some
evidence that voting has made America less militaristic or more humane. At the
same time that Congress funds the Pentagon at $700 million a day -- three times
more than what the Peace Corps gets in a year -- it gives so little money to
foreign aid that the United States is last among industrialized nations for the
percentage of wealth given to developing nations.
Elections are overfunded charades for pseudo-progress, staged for
the gullible who prefer representational democracy to personalist democracy.
Election day voting isnt needed for a personal commitment to the works of
mercy and rescue. It isnt needed to live simply or nonviolently.
All lasting social reform comes from below, not above -- and least
of all from the current crop of Gores, Bushes and their orchestrators. Voting
means transferring power to the top where little happens except entrenchment.
Not voting means denying credibility to the ethic of violence, whether perfumed
by the scent of the Constitution or cushioned by a war-based economy. It means
affirming ones own power -- lasting moral power, not passing political
power -- to confront it.
Colman McCarthy directs the Center for Teaching Peace,
Washington D.C. His e-mail address is colman@clark.net
National Catholic Reporter, November 3,
2000
|