|
Cover
story Adopting Mordechai
By CLAIRE
SCHAEFFER-DUFFY Special to the National Catholic
Reporter St. Paul, Minn.
Nick and Mary Eoloff, ages 71 and 68
respectively, have a family history similar to many Catholic couples of their
generation. The soft-spoken couple from St. Paul, who met on a blind date,
courted and got married 45 years ago. Six children arrived in 11 quick,
exhausting years. He edited legal documents. She taught English at a public
school and Our Lady of Peace Catholic High. Together, they relished their
retirement and the grandchildren that kept coming and coming -- 16 at last
count.
Recently, the Eoloffs added a new member to their family. On Oct.
27 they marked their third anniversary as adoptive parents of Israels
most notorious political prisoner, the nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu,
46. In the summer of 1986, Vanunu, a former technician at Dimona, Israels
secret nuclear facility, provided photographs to The Sunday Times of
London confirming that Israel, a purportedly non-nuclear state, possessed 100
to 200 nuclear warheads of advanced design. Kidnapped by Israeli agents on
Sept. 30, 1986, he has spent almost 12 years of his 18-year sentence in
solitary confinement in Israels Ashkelon prison.
A prophet to some, a spy and traitor to others, Vanunu is, to Nick
and Mary, their eldest child, the first on the list in Marys litany for
her children, prayed a thousand times throughout the unclaimed
moments of the day. Lord Jesus, she asks, Son of the Living
God, have mercy on Mordechai.
Aside from a small circle of family members, lawyers and priests,
the Eoloffs are the only people ever to visit the incarcerated Vanunu,
described by some as the most isolated prisoner in the history of Israeli
prisons.
Nick and Mary first learned of Vanunus case through a 1995
article in The Progressive magazine. They immediately began writing to
him. He wrote back, and they forged a friendship through letters. Their
sympathy for Vanunu was more than personal.
Veteran members of Pax Christi, the couple has a long history of
working for nuclear disarmament and human rights. In 1980, the Eoloffs wrote a
textbook on conscientious objection for Catholic educators. They opposed U.S.
military intervention in Central America in the early 1980s, spoke out against
the death penalty and torture, and protested the manufacture of nuclear weapon
parts in their home state. Mary risked arrest six times in acts of nonviolent
civil disobedience.
Vanunus case, the Eoloffs believed, needed more political
support, so they wrote to their senators and congressman, two of whom asked
U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright to inquire into claims about the
harsh conditions of his confinement. Albright replied that the Vanunu case was
an internal issue for the Israelis and the U.S. government would not intervene
on his behalf.
Meanwhile, Vanunu, who by this time had spent 10 years in
isolation, began to show signs of mental deterioration. Deciphering his
rambling, repetitious paragraphs of paranoia exhausted Mary, and she often
delayed reading his letters. In early 1997, the Eoloffs started to get
worried. They wondered if Vanunu could retain his sanity during the
remaining seven years of his sentence.
Israeli authorities maintained that Vanunu required isolation to
protect him from other prisoners who might attack him, and to prohibit him from
divulging classified information. Specifically, they feared he might give
information on Israels nuclear weapons program (Vanunu has said he has
told all he knows) or speak about his abduction, which is considered to be a
state secret by Israeli authorities but was a violation of Italian and
international law. Vanunu has not agreed to remain silent about his
kidnapping.
Drugged and bound
Immediately after his abduction in 1986, Vanunu was drugged, bound
to a shipping crate like an African slave, he told his brother, and
brought to Israel. Israel did not acknowledge detaining Vanunu until Nov. 9,
five weeks after his abduction. Author Mark Gaffney documents the early days of
Vanunus incarceration in his book Dimona the Third Temple? The Story
Behind the Vanunu Revelation: For the first month he was kept in
solitary confinement in total darkness in a tiny room -- with only a mattress
on the floor. During these first weeks, the authorities attempted to conceal
his identity. They forced him to grow a beard, to wear a kind of hat usually
worn by mental patients, and -- further mocking him -- they even tried to
change his name to David Enosh, that is, David, human being.
Amnesty International reports that during his secret detention he was
apparently interrogated and made a confession.
Vanunu was charged on two main counts: assistance to an enemy and
aggravated espionage. His trial began on Aug. 30, 1987, under what Gaffney
describes as exceptional security measures. A concrete and canvas
tunnel was constructed to conceal his entry into the court. Those who did
catch a glimpse, Gaffney writes, reported that Vanunu was taken in
handcuffs, with his head concealed by a motorists helmet. A police siren
wailed as he was led in, apparently to prevent the prisoner from being heard if
he tried to call out to newsmen. In every subsequent court appearance
following his trial, Vanunu has been prevented from speaking, according to
Amnesty International, sometimes by being physically gagged.
Amnesty International has condemned the treatment of Vanunu as
cruel, inhuman and degrading. His imprisonment included years of
confinement to a 6-by-9-foot cell (expanded by 3 feet in the mid-90s)
with constant camera surveillance and 24-hour fluorescent lighting. (The lights
were later shut off at night in response to international pressure.) During his
two hours of daily exercise, the authorities threw up burlap sacking around the
prison yard, concealing him from other inmates. He went on hunger strikes to
protest his conditions. Once, he smeared shaving cream on the eye of the
camera. For the first five years, he read the New Testament daily, out loud, to
keep his faith and his sanity.
Vanunu, a Jew, became a Christian shortly before he exposed
Israels nuclear secrets. His conversion influenced that decision. In a
letter to his friend and spiritual mentor, David Smith, an Anglican priest,
Vanunu wrote on March 25, 1989: How to follow Jesus. I want to say that I
am an ordinary man, but when I understood my mission I was like the prophet
Jonah. I ran away. I wanted to find who is my God and Lord. Then I found Jesus
Christ and when I accepted him and became Christs body, I said here I am.
I will follow you, and decided to tell all the world about the things that are
going on in Israel, to warn them of the possibility of a nuclear war in the
Middle East.
Alienated from the Israeli state and much of his biological
family, Vanunu hopes to reside in the United States after his release. His
biological parents are pious Orthodox Jews who migrated from Morocco to Israel.
Author Gaffney says Vanunus parents loved their son dearly but found his
conversion to Christianity and his political ignominy too much to bear. As
parents of a traitor, they endured ostracism and even physical
assault. After a few nightmarish visits to Ashkelon prison, they stopped coming
and severed communication with their son.
Vanunu is currently visited by three of his 10 siblings, brothers
Danny, Meir and Asher.
Naive about adoption
Our decision to adopt Vanunu was an idea born out of deep
frustration, said Nick. We were naive. We always thought Israel
wanted to get rid of him, to get him off their hands. We thought that if we
adopt him, he will get out. [The Eoloffs incorrectly thought adoption would
provide instant U.S. citizenship.] After we posed the proposition as a means of
getting him out, Vanunu said yes.
In February 1997, Nick submitted a petition for adoption with the
Juvenile Court of Ramsey County, Minn., along with the requisite fee of $125.
What followed was a roller coaster of legal maneuvers. The court initially
rejected the adoption request and then reconsidered it after finding a legal
precedent for an adult adopting an adult in the state of Minnesota.
Recognizing the exceptional circumstances of the case, the court
waived two of the three requirements for an adult adoption: No birth
certificate was needed (Marrakech, Morocco, did not keep such records), nor was
Vanunu required to appear in court. On Oct. 27, Judge John Connelly granted the
adoption. A month later, Ramsey County issued a birth certificate for Mordechai
Vanunu. It contains the original date of birth and states that Nick and Mary
are his parents.
Eager to meet their new son, the Eoloffs booked a flight to Tel
Aviv in February of 98. Their letters to U.S. and Israeli government
officials requesting permission to visit Vanunu had remained unanswered. They
flew out of St. Paul, still not knowing if the long-awaited meeting with their
seventh child would happen. Upon landing, they got a room in an obscure hotel
in Bethlehem and plotted how to penetrate the formidable Ashkelon prison. They
knew no one in Israel.
Prison on the coastline
Ashkelon prison is a nondescript, one-story building occupying a
long block of Mediterranean coastline. The glistening waters of the sea are the
eyes only respite from the dry, dusty environs. Walls fortified with
coiled barbed wire enclose the prison compound with approximately 200
Palestinian political prisoners, Israeli common criminals, Professor Abraham
Marcus Klingberg, the scientist who sold state secrets to the Soviet Union, and
Vanunu. A driveway leads up to the prisons only entrance, and no visitor
may enter without first checking in at the guard shack.
Nick and Mary couldnt get past the shack. After a 45-minute
wait, the prison warden came out, and Mary, who was clutching a bouquet of
yellow daffodils intended for the nature-deprived Vanunu, innocently requested
a visit and handed the official her gift. Could you, she asked,
give these to Mordechai? Perhaps touched by the couples
guilelessness, the warden promised to call them the next day.
Miraculously the visit was approved.
The starkness of that first visit with Mordechai is forever etched
in Marys memory. We were shown into a cold, bare, sterile
room, she said. Mordechais brothers, Meir and Asher, who had
accompanied the Eoloffs, stood on their left. Vanunu stood behind a wall of
fine mesh steel with an English-speaking guard beside him, closely monitoring
their conversation. The Eoloffs and Vanunu wept quietly. He looked like
such an old man. So old, said Mary. When I saw him I thought,
It is so inhuman to be meeting him this way. This man is like a fish in a
cage.
In March of 1998, Vanunu was released from solitary confinement
and housed in the general prison population, and, according to the Eoloffs, his
health and appearance improved with the transition.
The friendship between the unassuming Midwestern couple and the
impassioned inmate matured over subsequent visits -- six thus far. Vanunu, who
used to converse, almost obsessively, about nuclear weapons, now indulges in
personal revelations and even argues with his adoptive parents. He begs the
Eoloffs to be more specific in their correspondence. In your
letters, he told them. I want to know when the dog barks, when it
is your birthday. That keeps me alive.
Vanunu worries about his health, and Nick encourages him to keep
exercising. Vanunu loves opera. He loves chocolate. He reads history and
admits, without cracking a smile, that he has no time to read a
novel. He disagrees with the Eoloffs critique of the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank and prefers Newsweek to the
not-so-mainstream publications they have subscribed to for him. He wants to
improve his English. He wants to marry and have a family. When he writes to a
woman, he always asks for her picture.
Vanunu is no person up on a pedestal, said Nick.
He is just like you and me.
Some consider the actions of the ordinary man to be
extraordinarily significant. Sam Day, coordinator for the U.S. Campaign to Free
Mordechai Vanunu, said that the photos Vanunu gave to The Sunday Times
confirmed to the world for the first time that Israel did indeed have a
secret nuclear weapons program. And [a] much bigger [program] than anyone
expected. Vanunus act, Day said, launched the first opening
of public debate about what was going on behind the backs of the Israeli public
in its governments production of secret weapons of mass
destruction. Day sees Vanunu as an example for others involved in
nuclear production. He demonstrates the kind of acts of conscience that can be
done to blow the whistle.
In February of this year, Israels parliament, the Knesset,
held an unprecedented public debate on Israeli nuclear policy. Prior to the
February forum, Israels nuclear issues were resolved behind closed doors
in the Knessets foreign affairs and defense committee and the government
maintained a policy of nuclear ambiguity, neither confirming nor
denying the countrys nuclear arsenal.
In November of 1999, Yediot Ahronot, Israels largest
daily, published excerpts from transcripts of Vanunus trial, which
revealed a thoughtful and conscientious Vanunu and facilitated the possibility
of the Knesset debate. The day after the transcripts were published, the
newspapers military analyst wrote a piece headlined The Death of
the Ambiguity.
Vanunus 18-year sentence ends in September 2004. Since his
release from solitary in March 1998, he has spent an additional four months in
isolation as punishment for minor infractions. The Eoloffs know Vanunu will
need a lot of assistance recovering from the trauma of his incarceration and,
like any good parents, they want to provide a stable base for his new
beginnings. Anticipating some of his practical needs upon his release, Nick has
already opened a bank account for him in St. Paul, Minn. Meanwhile, in between
the bi-annual visits to Ashkelon, which Vanunu has requested, the Eoloffs
tirelessly tell his story and support his cause, global nuclear
disarmament.
Asked how this seventh child had changed her, Mary quietly mused,
In my mind, I believe we are all one. This adoption concretizes
it.
National Catholic Reporter, November 24,
2000
|
|