Popes pick befuddles analysts
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
NCR Staff Rome
Pope John Paul II, by including German Bishop Karl Lehmann of
Mainz in his latest additions to the College of Cardinals, has bolstered the
moderate-to-progressive faction among the men who will elect his successor.
In so doing, the pope threw the political analysis surrounding the
next papal election, whenever it might occur, into fresh confusion.
Lehmann joins six other cardinals named by John Paul during his
Jan. 28 Angelus address. The announcement, coming just one week after the pope
elevated 37 other men, stunned Vatican observers. On Jan. 21, the pope
announced a consistory, or ceremony for making new cardinals, would be held
exactly one month later, on Feb. 21.
The most recent announcement marked the first time in memory a
pope has added names to such a list after revealing it publicly.
The Jan. 28 appointees, in addition to Lehmann, are: Archbishop
Marian Jaworski, the Latin-rite bishop of Lviv, Ukraine; Archbishop Janis
Pujats of Latvia; Archbishop Lubomyr Husar, newly elected head of the Greek
Catholic church in Ukraine; Archbishop Johannes Degenhardt of Germany;
Archbishop Julio Terrazas Sandoval of Bolivia; and Archbishop Wilfrid Fox
Napier of South Africa.
Jaworski and Pujats, the pope said, were actually named cardinals
in pectore, or secretly, in 1998.
Lehmann, 64, is clearly the bombshell.
This nomination is very important, said Italian church
historian Alberto Melloni, who prepared the official biography for the
beatification of Pope John XXIII.
For some 13 years Lehmann has been the most celebrated
non-cardinal in the Catholic church -- celebrated, that is, precisely for not
being a cardinal. The head of a diocese traditionally governed by a cardinal,
and three times elected chair of the German bishops conference, Lehmann
had been denied the cardinals red hat four times. Most analysts cited
views in conflict with Vatican policy.
Among divergences from the Vatican line, Lehmann has suggested a
change in the celibacy rule as a solution to the priest shortage. He allowed
divorced and civilly remarried Catholics in his diocese to receive the
sacraments until the Vatican intervened. He has criticized Vatican restrictions
on lay ministry and called for more democracy in church structures.
Many observers think that Lehman, who speaks near-perfect Italian,
will have a strong role within the college.
Lehmann is a politically astute figure, someone who can
maneuver with Sodano [the Vatican secretary of state] and Ruini [president of
the Italian bishops conference], but from a more moderate point of
view, Melloni said.
The Vaticans explanation for the second announcement of new
cardinals was that the pope wanted to elevate the new leader of the Ukranian
Greek Catholics but was not able to do so until after his election, which took
place Jan. 26. Husar, the newly elected leader, succeeds Cardinal Myroslav
Lubachivsky, who died last month. The pope is set to visit Ukraine June
23-27.
According to Vatican spokesman Joaquín Navarro Valls, who
offered the explanation, the pope reserved six other names for the second
announcement so that the winner of the Greek Catholic vote would not be named
alone.
So goes the official version. It is worth noting, though, that the
pope did not share his plan widely, even with those most directly concerned. A
spokesperson for the diocese of Mainz told NCR that Lehmann learned of
his nomination late Jan. 26, just 36 hours before the announcement.
Doubts about the official account surfaced immediately in the
Italian press. Many commentators speculated about a behind-the-scenes political
offensive from German Catholic leaders. One analyst went so far as to suggest
that former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl was involved.
Generally speaking, theorists fall into two camps. One holds that
Lehmanns appointment was John Pauls move, made against the counsel
of his closest curial advisers, and motivated by a desire to transcend church
politics. The other view contends that German pressure overcame John
Pauls resistance to the move. The Vatican values German loyalty, among
other reasons, because Germany is one of the largest donors to the annual
Vatican budget.
Whatever the case, with Lehmann joining fellow high-profile German
moderate Walter Kasper, appointed Jan. 21, the moderate faction in the college
seems to have gained new life.
Other moderates are said to include Cardinals Carlo Maria Martini
of Italy, Godfried Danneels of Belgium, Roger Etchegaray of France, and Roger
Mahony of Los Angeles in the United States. This group, according to most
observers, favors reform in the direction of collegiality, or shared
decision-making in the church, as opposed to a heavy concentration of power in
the Vatican.
Lehmann is viewed as one of the leading theologians among the
upper ranks of church leaders. He served from 1964 to 1967 as an assistant to
Jesuit Fr. Karl Rahner, one of the foremost Catholic theologians of the 20th
century and among the architects of the reforms associated with the Second
Vatican Council (1962-65). Lehmann was seen as Rahners likely successor
and intellectual heir before he was named bishop of Mainz in 1983.
In some ways, Lehmann has come to function as a symbol of the
German church, which many in the Vatican view as unacceptably
anti-Roman. In 1995, more than 2 million Germans signed a petition
demanding reforms in the church on issues such as birth control and
bishops appointments. The strongest progressive Catholic movements in
Europe are located in Germany and Austria.
Vatican displeasure with Germany has seemed strong in recent
years. John Paul II has given the red hat to only six Germans in 22 years, most
recently in 1991.
The two recent announcements, however, include four new German
cardinals. Three are under 80 and therefore eligible to vote for the next
pope.
Degenhardt, 74, another of the Germans, is seen as a staunch
conservative. In the early 1990s he took away priest-psychologist Eugen
Drewermanns permission to teach Catholic theology and later expelled him
from the priesthood. Drewermann, a best-selling author, had denied the
historical reality of doctrines such as Jesus Virgin Birth, preferring to
interpret them as psychological archetypes.
Among the other new cardinals, Napier, 59, has a reputation as a
strong crusader for racial justice in South Africa and a moderate on
theological issues.
Sandoval is reputedly a classic Wojtyla appointment, a
progressive on social issues who holds a firm papal line on theological debates
inside the church. His appointment raises the number of Latin American
cardinals to 27, adding to speculation about a Latin American successor to John
Paul II.
Jaworski, a Pole, is a long-time friend of John Paul, one of a few
bishops with a standing invitation to use a guest room directly above the papal
apartments when visiting Rome. When Wojtyla was a young priest in Poland, he
once asked Jaworski to substitute for him because of a scheduling conflict.
Jaworski lost his right hand in a train accident on the way. It was a sacrifice
the pope has obviously not forgotten.
The new appointments push to 135 the number of electors, or
cardinals under 80 eligible to vote in a papal election, well past the
ceiling of 120 set by Paul VI and confirmed by John Paul himself.
Barring death, it would be January 2003 before aging would reduce the number of
cardinal-electors to 120.
The e-mail address for John L. Allen Jr. is
jallen@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, February 9,
2001
|