Cover
story Intolerance in India
By THOMAS C. FOX
NCR Staff Chhindia, India
A four-hour drive from the nearest
town, this dirt-poor village in northwestern India is inhabited by
tribals (indigenous people), mostly Christian -- and is occupied by
police who sit in front of a small church, rifles at their sides, to make sure
Christians do not enter to worship.
Police have been camped out on folding chairs here since last
November. That was when a band of drunken men arrived in trucks to ransack the
church. They came shouting Hindu slogans, including Hail to God
Ram! as they entered the small white stucco church building, desecrated
it and tried to convert it into a Hindu temple.
First, they took down a cross at the pinnacle of the roof and
raised a Hindu flag in its place. Then they tore iron grills, each bearing a
sign of the cross, from the windows. Inside, they desecrated the altar and
placed pictures of Hindu gods throughout the church.
Bishop Ezra Sargunnam, spiritual leader of the Evangelical
Churches of India to which the Chhindia church is affiliated, rushed the next
day to the spot and immediately went on a hunger strike. A week later, his body
deteriorating, he was taken to a nearby hospital.
Since November the police have remained in the village, living in
tents next to the church. They spend their days cooking, eating, smoking,
drinking and spitting on the church steps.
At first the villagers took their complaints about the police
presence to local officials, but were turned away. They then took their pleas
to a local court, but a judge, citing what the villagers call fabricated
papers, ruled that the church had been closed at the request of one of the
villagers who wanted to reclaim his land.
Without recourse, Christians, some 1,500 in all, have gathered
Sundays in their homes to pray. The police show up there, too, the villagers
say, playing loud music or hurling threats at the worshipers.
Halmoti village, some 20 miles away, is mostly Catholic. So it
came as a shock to Halmotis tribals when, in 1998, Hindu nationalists
decided to build a temple right next to their church. The Hindus laid their
cornerstone with great fanfare, attracting hundreds of people on Christmas day,
the date chosen for its potential to disrupt. Today, the temple sits
immediately behind the church. Lacking local worshippers, the temple is empty
except for caretakers. But ceremonies can be planned for any day, and villagers
recognize the likelihood the Hindus will gather to pray on Christian feast
days.
In many places in India, thousands of Hindu shrines are being
placed across from Christian institutions. It is all part of what Christians
see as a campaign to persecute them, a campaign fostered by Hindu nationalist
politicians who have taken control of the national government.
These examples of harassment are minor compared with many others
that have ended in bloodshed. A climate of persecution has existed in India
since 1997 when Hindu nationalists gained political control. They have targeted
Muslims and Christians, claiming they belong to foreign religions,
blaming them for many of the ills that face the nation, then watched as mobs
have taken matters into their own hands.
Of Indias 1 billion people, 85 percent are Hindus, 10
percent Muslims and 2.5 percent Christians. Seventy-five percent of Indian
Christians come from tribal groups or dalit castes. (Dalit in
Sanskrit means trampled upon and refers to low castes, officially called
scheduled castes and once commonly called the Untouchables.) This becomes
important because with Christianity comes education. The dalits
inclusion represents a rejection of the caste system -- and a perceived threat
to tradition and the Hindu nationalists.
The Christian minority, meanwhile, is virtually helpless to
protect itself, given tacit approval for these acts of violence from top
government officials.
We now see at least one case of violence against a Christian
every 36 hours somewhere in the country, said John Dayal, a founder of a
human rights group called the United Christian Forum for Human Rights.
There were 200 reported cases in the last year, and the real number is
much higher. Dayal said many violations go unreported because Christians
fear reprisals.
Dayal blames the attacks on nationalist politicians who use
religion as a tool for political gain.
Hindu nationalism upholds one religion, one culture and one
nation. It used to be that to be a nationalist one only had to be an
Indian; now one needs to be a Hindu, Dayal said, referring to the wave of
Hindu fundamentalism unleashed in parts of India.
Christians as scapegoats
Said Fr. Gerard Valavan, a priest who works with poor children in
the southern city of Bangalore: Its easier to blame Christians for
Indias woes than to end poverty or provide people with adequate
education. We are the scapegoats for their failures.
One of the most publicized incidents of bloodshed against
Christians occurred Jan. 23, 1999, when an Australian missionary named Graham
Staines and his two young sons were murdered by a mob. The three were asleep in
their car in the state of Orissa when a mob, shouting Hindu slogans, set fire
to their car. Villagers were beaten for trying to help Staines and his
sons.
Staines and his sons were in the village to attend an annual Bible
camp. He had worked in India for many years, and ran a hospital and clinics for
lepers. Police arrested 51 suspects in connection with the crime. Most of those
arrested, however, were released for lack of evidence.
Dayals list of incidents grows almost daily: June 7, Br.
George Kuzhikandam murdered near Mathura; June 8, Bomb blasts in two churches
in Tadepalliguddem and Ongole; June 8, Crude bomb explodes in St. Andrews
Church in Vasco, Gao; June 11, Ashish Prabash, a missionary, murdered in
Jalundhar, Punjab; June 12, A 22-year-old Christian priest, Rajendra Masih, was
beaten, his head shaved and was paraded through Vishrampuri village.
Incidents have included the murders of priests and missionaries,
the gang raping of nuns and the desecration and destruction of countless
churches and schools.
As the list has grown it has alarmed human rights organizations
around the world. They express shock and outrage at the growing atmosphere of
intolerance in many places in India, especially in tribal areas. Some of the
incidents are reported in small Christian publications, but few ever make the
Indian press and, almost none are reported outside India.
Indias Christians say they feel safer in cities where fewer
attacks take place. Yet a womens religious community that took my wife
and me in for several days in Bangalore, a city of 6 million, lived in fear at
night. They had purchased two large dogs that roamed their fenced-in property
and alerted them when strangers approached.
You feel safer in the cities than you do in the
countryside, said Sr. Rose Mary of Our Lady of the Mission. At
night you never know. It didnt use to be like this.
Christians here say their only recourse is to bring these
incidents to the wider world. They say their government leaders, who want to
develop stronger economic ties with the West, are influenced only by threats of
cutting off economic aid.
Christians here also assert that top government officials have
encouraged the atmosphere of fear and intolerance. Then when violence occurs
these officials turn a deaf ear to Christian complaints. Christians offer the
example of the Prime Minister Atal Vajpayee, who, in 1999, after touring the
state of Gujarat, a state where gangs had destroyed some 30 churches, was
expected to denounce the violence. Instead he called for a debate on the
controversial issue of conversions.
Jesuit Fr. Vally de Souza, who lives in Gujurat, where much of the
violence has erupted in recent years, recalls a time you could take complaints
to the local authorities. No longer. They dont seem to care
anymore. They dont listen. There is an atmosphere that tolerates violence
against the unprotected Christians, especially the tribals.
Before his sudden death in an accident in Poland last year, the
archbishop of New Delhi, Alan de Lastic, who headed the Indian Bishops
Conference at the time, rebuked Vajpayee for not speaking out against the
attacks. Your silence kills, Mr. Prime Minister, de Lastic was
quoted as saying.
To some outsiders it still remains a mystery that Christians, a
group as small as 2.4 percent of the Indian population, can plausibly be
considered a threat to any group. Part of the answer to that question rests in
the fact that while Christians represent a tiny minority, their social clout is
much larger. Christians, for example, provide up to 25 percent of all of
Indias schools and hospitals. These institutions serve all the people.
Most often only a small fraction of the students in Catholic schools are
Catholic.
We have influence well beyond our numbers, said Fr.
Shenoy (he uses one name) who heads an ashram, or prayer center, in Bangalore,
where people often gather for interreligious dialogue, discussing differences
and sharing common concerns. He thinks reasonable people should be appreciative
of the contributions Christians make in India. Many are appreciative, he notes,
adding, Intolerance is not reasonable. Education is the answer, he
said.
The aim of Sangh Parivar
Informed observers here make a distinction between Hinduism, the
religion, and Hindutva, adherents of the political philosophy of the Sangh
Parivar, which traces back to the 1930s and has been linked to fascism. The aim
of Sangh Parivar is to awaken Hindus to a call for restoration of their lost
glory. It has been this philosophy that most observers here agree is behind the
recent wave of Christian persecution.
This is a dangerous and evil distortion of a general sense
of nationalism, said Dayal.
Hindu fundamentalism has already left an ugly mark in India. It
was a Hindu nationalist who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, father of modern
India. Gandhi led a nonviolent resistance movement against the British
colonialists. This movement eventually won Indias independence.
The Hindutva has largely been out of the mainstream of Indian
politics since Indias independence from the British in 1947. Since then,
the nation has been ruled almost entirely by one party, the Indian National
Congress Party, a secular party that served as a powerful force in the drive
for independence.
In recent years, as India, its Hindu religion, culture and social
structures faced enormous new challenges, Hindu fundamentalism has grown. A
major factor in that growth is anxiety over loss of the nations
glorious past, meaning a time when its complicated caste system
went unchallenged. Changes contributing to the threat include growth of cities
and creation of jobs outside the traditional caste system. They also include
education of women, deemed within the caste system to be inferior. Further,
education of the lower castes, often by Christians who believe it is their
mission to reach out to the poorest in India, threatens the system. Christians
have learned that it is within the lower castes that the most successful
evangelization work is likely to occur.
When India gained its independence, Gandhi and other national
leaders aspired to democratic principles, rooted in a system of one man,
one vote. The founders of modern India, hoping to move to a more
egalitarian order, wrote laws that reserved portions of government jobs and
educational slots to tribal peoples and members of the lower castes. These
reservations attempted to mirror the population, giving these
marginalized groups up to two-thirds of the reserved posts.
The new practices opened doors to upward mobility. Today few
dispute that affirmative action policies have benefited people in the lower
castes. However, giving the same voting clout to high caste Brahmans and low
caste dalits worked against the Bhramans and others in higher
castes.
The caste system, while greatly weakened in the cities, is very
much alive in the rural areas. In many parts of India, a lower caste person
cannot allow his or her shadow to fall on a member of the upper caste.
Eventually some politicians from the higher castes sought new ways
to mobilize lower caste support for their political purposes. Hindu nationalist
politicians did this by playing the religious card, observers
say.
On one hand, these politicians tried to homogenize differences
within Hinduism. On the other hand, they declared war against Muslims and
Christians, accusing them of being dupes of foreigners and unpatriotic. These
charges are especially painful to Indian Catholics, many of whom trace their
religious heritage to St. Thomas, the apostle. It is believed Thomas brought
the faith to India in the year 52. His remains are believed to be buried in a
crypt in the small church of St. Thomas in Chennai (formerly Madras) on the
southwestern coast of India.
The intolerance found in parts of India today runs counter to the
atmosphere of religious and ethnic tolerance that has characterized India since
independence. India is a regionally and ethnically diverse nation with some 20
official regional languages. An estimated 1,000 languages are spoken in all.
Indians take pride in their tolerance. This makes the recent wave of
persecution all the more remarkable and unsettling.
The Hindutva trace their current course to seeds of violence
planted more than 500 years ago. It was in 1528, the Hindu nationalists say,
that Babar, the founder of the Moghul empire, built a mosque, reportedly on the
site of a temple marking the birthplace of Lord Rama, an important Hindu god.
Others question this fact, saying it is a myth propagated by the Sangh Parivar.
Fact or fiction, that outrage was not forgotten.
Hindu nationalists got their revenge on Dec. 6, 1992. That is when
a cadre of about 100,000 Hindu fanatics, working with leaders of the current
national ruling party, the Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) -- which at the time
controlled the state where the mosque was situated -- destroyed Babars
Mosque in the small town of Ayodhya. At the same time, armed Hindu groups
launched anti-Muslim riots in about a dozen of Indias largest cities. The
worst was the anti-Muslim pogrom in Bombay where about 4,000 Muslims were
hunted and massacred by anti-Muslim activists.
Hindu nationalists had made their point and got the attention they
wanted. By 1997 they had taken control of the state of Gujarat and had put
together a political alliance that brought them to national power.
Attacks led to counterattacks
The Hindu fundamentalist attacks led to counterattacks and bomb
throwing by Muslims seeking revenge. Many more died before a cease-fire could
be reached. Observers say that in that mayhem it became apparent that Muslims
-- a sizable 10 percent of the Indian population -- had significant social and
political clout. They could not be easy scapegoats. Christians provided an
easier target. So the target shifted.
According to a Jesuit Fr. Lancy Lobo, an Indian sociologist who
has studied these religious conflicts, Hindu nationalists have accused
Christian missionaries of converting tribals and lower castes by force or
fraud, although no specific cases are offered to substantiate the allegations.
In recent years, Lobo said, attacks on Christians have escalated in Gujarat,
where he teaches. It has become common for Hindu nationalists to disrupt
Christmas midnight Masses by holding rallies outside churches.
Most acts of violence against Christians take place in rural
tribal areas, where people are susceptible to political manipulation, Lobo
said. The strategy, he said, is to use differences among the Christian and
non-Christian tribals to divide them and pit one against the other.
Shenoy, the ashram leader in Bangalore, blames Hindu intolerance
on illiteracy and ignorance. Attacks on Christians are far less common in major
cities where literacy is higher and information spreads more freely, he said.
(Indian illiteracy runs close to 50 percent and in rural areas around 70
percent or more.)
One of the most controversial subjects in India today deals with
the issue of conversion. Hindu nationalists are convinced that Christians, with
money coming from foreign sources, force conversions to weaken traditional
Indian social structures. It is a charge Christians vigorously deny.
Hindus claim that up to 10,000 foreign missionaries work in India,
although more accurate figures get placed at just over 1,000. Numbers have
fallen as the government has denied most visas and visa renewals.
The right to convert is guaranteed by the Indian constitution. Yet
any tribal or dalit who converts to Christianity loses all of his or her
rights to the educational and financial assistance reserved for these minority
groups. An early amendment in the Indian constitution took away the rights of
dalits who do not profess the Hindu faith. The Presidential Order of
1950 gives the protection and strength of affirmative action only to
Hindus.
Critics argue that religious affiliation should not affect
ones social or economic status and religious affiliation. They see this
as discrimination. The result, though, has been a slowdown in conversions among
the lower castes. The percentage of Christians in India has fallen from 2.7 to
2.4 percent in the past several decades.
Among Catholics, the charge of forced conversions appears well off
the mark. Most Catholic missionaries in India today work primarily to provide
much needed social and educational services. They have taken their lead from
the Second Vatican Council (1963-65) and post-conciliar evangelical documents
that have placed greater emphasis on social ministry and living as examples of
the Christian faith and less on outright conversion.
These Catholic missionaries view their work as a dialogue with
culture and religion. Indian theologians, meanwhile, speak of witnessing to the
Kingdom of God and link this witness to their social ministries. Some Indian
theologians go beyond that, maintaining that religious pluralism is part of
Gods plan.
The same attitude is not always found among some fundamentalist
Indian Christians. Some of these evangelists see as their aim saving India from
its heathen religions, such as the traditional Hindu faith. They
preach an intolerance of their own. The problem is, Shenoy said, most Indians
do not distinguish among the various Christian groups. Christian
fundamentalists give all Christians a bad image, in his view.
There is little evidence there is going to be any change for
the better soon, said Dayal. Not as long as the Hindu nationalists have
scapegoats they can blame for Indias many social problems, he adds.
Meanwhile, the hope is that new elections in India will eventually sweep the
nationalists out of power. But those elections are still more than two years
away.
Republic of
India |
Population: 1
billion Official languages: Hindi, English
(14 official regional languages) Capital:
New Delhi States: 25 Largest cities: Mumbia (Bombay) 18 million; Kolkata
(Calcutta) 13 million; New Delhi 11 million Head of
Government: Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee (An alliance led by
Vajpayee won a majority in 1999 legislative elections.) |
Religious affiliations in
India |
Hindu:
80.3% Muslim: 11% Christian: 2.4% Other: 3.09% Sikh: 2% Buddist: 0.7% Jain: 0.5% Zoroastrian: 0.01% |
Tom Foxs e-mail is tfox@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, May 4, 2001
|