EDITORIAL U.S. learning to reflect, ask questions
The United States had almost become
convinced of the idea that the worlds lone superpower could go it alone.
We were far down the road of believing that our highest purpose was
accumulating goods and profits.
And then came Sept. 11.
In an instant everything changed. The world became different, our
sense of security, of invulnerability vanished. There was reason to fear, now,
that awful things could happen at the heart of our greatest cities.
As days pass, however, it becomes clear that changes have to do
with far more than what might make us afraid.
The initial talk of quick retaliation and a resolve to smoke out
terrorists has been somewhat moderated. The United States has shown patience,
and one can feel even a certain reflectiveness in the air, a willingness to ask
questions along with expressions of determination to root out Osama bin Laden
and his terrorist network.
Could it be that we have learned from past experience? Could it be
that our language has been seeded with the questions that arose from earlier
eras, from World War II and Vietnam, so now even within government one heard
cautions about civil liberties and the need to understand the deeper causes of
conflict?
Could it be that our thinking has been influenced by peace
advocates who keep sometimes lonely but persistent vigil at the thresholds of
power; that the words of religious leaders, including our bishops in their past
considerations of war and peace, had leavened the national conversation going
on now?
The cardinal archbishop of New York, a post that the government
could once count on for unqualified support, now raises a caution (see story,
Page 10) for the warriors. Vengeance, reprisals and retaliation are not
the words of civilized people, Edward Egan said. Certainly we want
justice to be done if we can identify responsible groups and individuals, but
we dont want to make ourselves complicit in a series of injustices
by striking at people who are not implicated.
He urged a national examination of conscience, saying, To do
so is not to say that there were necessarily errors committed, though there
might have been, Egan said. But we should ask, how do we account
for what has happened?
Other changes are easier to detect, forced as they are by the new
circumstances. It is difficult to continue to preach the gospel of extreme
individualism at the same time that ringing cries for unity are being issued.
It is tough to sell a war and the possibilities of wartime sacrifice unless
everyone is convinced were in this together and that the sacrifice is for
the common good, an expression that has not found much favor in U.S. political
speech of recent vintage.
The public outlook in recent days has been rather communitarian.
We have become keenly aware that the horrible losses are losses for the entire
world community, not just a nation, a family, a city or a religious or ethnic
group.
Getting government off our backs is no longer the primary concern.
We tacitly recognize the limits of the private sector and look eagerly for
government to take charge, to give us answers, to provide a vision. The
firefighters and police who lost their lives selflessly working to save others
were not working out of a profit motive; they werent lazy
government bureaucrats.
Through it all, God has surfaced in a new way, all over television
and newspapers. It may be in a superficial way that the Almighty is being
called on in some circumstances. More significant is the public recognition
that the God being invoked is not the sole property of a single group or
denomination, but is, indeed, the God of the various religions. Those who had
appropriated God to their own absolute purposes, be it in the extremes of Islam
or Christianity, are now being shown as frauds, as those who would sow hate in
the name of an ideology or national purpose.
We are just beginning -- before any bombs have been dropped -- to
ask ourselves difficult questions. If there is an American distinction it is
the tolerance we can show for discussion of the difficult balancing act we must
perform between strong government and individual freedoms; between war and
peace; between tenets of faith and military might; between justice and mercy;
between being that lone superpower and being able to hear the groaning of
millions beneath the roar of terror.
National Catholic Reporter, October 12,
2001
|