|
Cover
story The
snake coiled deep in our hearts
By RICH HEFFERN
Between Ronald Reagans
characterization of the Soviet Union as the Evil Empire and Sept. 11, 2001, the
word evil was rarely heard in public discourse. It cropped up only on
the fringes, in frenzied World Wrestling Federation promos or pumped-up
dialogue from Marvel comics -- in phrases like Taste the creamy goodness
of justice, evildoers!
But then news coverage of the terrorist attacks in the United
States showed us evils effects close up -- innocents burned, then crushed
in apocalyptic clouds of fire and dust, the perpetrators praising God in the
aftermath.
Evil came back in vogue.
On Sept. 16 President Bush pledged that the United States would
rid the world of evildoers, the term he has most used to describe
Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida operatives. Later he said, War was
declared on the U.S., not by a religious group, not by one country vs. another,
but by people motivated by evil.
This great country will not let evil
stand.
In late November, explaining why the bombing of Afghanistan would
not stop during Ramadan, the president said: Evil has no holy
days.
Others, playing off Bushs theme, have called the attacks
devilish and the terrorists fiendish.
World events have us once again publicly contemplating age-old
questions about evil. Where does it come from? Is it here to stay? Is evil
merely an illusion or an impersonal quality that is part of the world, or a
personal spiritual being that exists eternally just to pester us? Are some of
us completely under evils influence and others not?
We know it when we see it. Evil presents itself through behavior,
either on the part of nature or humans, which greatly frightens and troubles us
or directly makes us suffer. When it appears as a hurricane or drought, cancer
cells prowling the blood of an innocent child, or misfiring neurotransmitters
causing a mental illness, we know somehow that its not a perfect world in
which we live. Nature is, at best, impersonal, indifferent; at worst,
defective.
When humans are involved, then it becomes moral evil, because
humans, by definition, are not impersonal. This brand of evil is much more
troublesome to us.
We think of evil as a mysterious entity that somehow compels us to
destructive behavior. Collectively we share an apprehension that this
destructive behavior is wrong to varying degrees. Genocide, incest, child
prostitution, cannibalism, terrorism -- most agree these are way beyond the
pale and never justified. Hugely destructive behavior is often excused, though,
if ones particular group sees it as a means toward an end that represents
greater good for that group. Evil is then in the eye of the beholder.
Elsewhere in the living world, examples of what we would call
evil behavior are present from the low end on up. Animal
behaviorists, particularly students of our relatives, the primates, point out
that apes have been observed committing deceit, murder, rape and small-scale
warfare. Snakes symbolize evil but are actually fairly docile creatures that
keep the rodents from overrunning us.
Only humans truly comprehend the difference between right and
wrong, then go on to slaughter each other in huge numbers in the most horrific
ways. In the 20th century alone, casualties resulting from human evil run into
the hundreds of millions.
Whether encountered in a history book, on the evening news or in
the results of a recent biopsy, evil is a problem. Every religion has to tackle
it in a convincing way.
An appalling absence of good
Evil is back in our vocabulary, but do we really know what it is?
Stephen J. Duffy, professor of philosophy at Loyola University, New Orleans,
wrote the entry on evil in the New Dictionary of Catholic
Spirituality. I subscribe to St. Augustines view of evil,
Duffy told NCR. Augustine pointed out that love is a reality, good
is a reality, the array of good things are real. Evil is simply an absence of a
good that ought to be there. If I murder you, its because of an absence
in me of empathy, shame, et cetera. The results of this absence, of course, can
be catastrophic and horrific. The effect of evil is to somehow cause suffering
in others, and sometimes that suffering occurs on a horrendous scale. The
absence of good can do great damage.
There are four ways to explain evils ultimate origin,
according to Duffy, all expressed in ancient myth.
Myth tells the story of how the human condition became
wretched, he said. The Babylonian myth argues that evil comes because
there are evil gods. The Greek myth says evil is part of human destiny. The
Gnostic or Manichean myth holds that matter is inherently evil, that good
exists only outside the universe. And finally the Judeo-Christian argues that
evil is a choice made by humans. God allows it so that humans have free will.
Without free will we are mere automatons, puppets.
Evils ultimate origin is a problem because, he
said, as Christians, we make God very personal. Does evil come from God?
How can we reconcile these three propositions: God is all-good; God is
all-powerful; evil exists in creation? This is the problem that every religion
must address, and the explanation is called theodicy.
What about the concept of the demonic -- evil as a spirit roaming
the world or a spiritual force? Its valid, Duffy believes, as a symbol.
We dont like to admit that evil resides in us, so we project our
own evil outward on others. But, as the Catholic doctrine of original sin was
trying to tell us, evil is inherent in us humans. Its that reptilian part
of the brain that still resides in us and carries, for example, the urge to
aggression that had evolutionary value once but no longer.
The demonic in society is certainly expressed in unjust
systems, institutions, corporations and practices that we are complicit in as
members, consumers or stockholders. The seamstress in El Salvador making a
barely living wage so we can have cheap but elegant clothes is just one
example. The web of evil runs through our society, Duffy said.
We have to remember also Pauls letter to the Romans:
Where evil abounds, there is grace also. Christ has overcome evil. Evil does
not have the last word.
Are there persons motivated purely by evil? Eleonore Stump,
professor of philosophy at St. Louis University, told NCR: I would
be shy about saying I know the motivations of others. An act can be perfectly
evil, even demonic, and have good motives in the eye of the perpetrator.
The atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to hasten the
end of the war and prevent even more killing.
The bottom line, she said, is that the whole crust of the
earth is soaked with the tears of victims of evil. Some evils that humans have
perpetrated stop discourse entirely, like the Holocaust. Then we must recognize
we are members of a species that is capable of such horrors and put your hand
over your mouth in stunned amazement. Self-reflection and prayer should ensue.
We are infected by evil, all of us humans. This is the Christian idea of
original sin.
However, God can use suffering to cure by way of atonement,
purging, to accomplish good, she said. A child with leukemia undergoing
chemotherapy is suffering, but only because the regimen wards off a greater
harm, which is death. God can use evil as therapeutic regimen. This is the
medieval view of evil expressed, for example, by Gregory the Great. St. Gregory
pointed out that the ways of God are mysterious when God lets good things
happen to good people and bad things to bad people. Wait! Isnt that
backward? No. If suffering is part of a medicinal regimen, then you
would expect the good to get a stronger regimen than the bad. Seen through eyes
of faith, God must have a morally sufficient reason, a benefit so big that
its worth the suffering. And that benefit is intimacy and ultimate union
with God.
The notion of the demonic, that there are immaterial, intelligent
beings who are evil, is not helpful, said Stump. The human capacity for evil is
sufficient, unfortunately, to explain results.
Everything God created is good, said Theresa Sanders, associate
professor of theology at Georgetown University in Washington. If we take
Johns Gospel seriously, she said, then we know God is love.
Evil has no real existence. Bad things happen to the extent that love is
absent. The devastating effects of loves absence is a testimony to
the power and scope of that love.
Sanders said this Christian view of evil is an existential one.
People who do bad things have willfully turned away from the good. The question
she asks her students when confronting the problem of evil in classes: If God
can intervene and avert evil consequences and then does not intervene, why
should we worship such a deity? Most students, she said, answer that having
free will is worth the price and that, in the end, all will be well.
Evil in the balance
According to Fr. Peter C. Phan, president of the Catholic Theology
Society of America and Warren-Blanding Professor of Religion and Culture at
Catholic University in Washington, evil is a term that is useful in
describing actions or results that cause much suffering. But its a
danger, Phan thinks, to ascribe evil to persons. First, when we project
evil onto others, then we forget that it comes from the innermost heart of all
of us. We see it in others, but fail to see it in ourselves. And, secondly, we
forget that evil dwells in institutions, structures, systems of law, ways of
doing and thinking that we all are complicit in. We say we are the only
freedom-loving people in the world; we forget that others love freedom just as
much as we do.
Born in Vietnam, Phan believes the Asian religious perspective can
be helpful when considering evil. Asian philosophy emphasizes the tension
between two forces, good and evil. When one dominates, then the other is
neglected and can rise up in unexpected ways. In the Asian view, there is no
absolute evil, only this tension of opposites. So we seek a balance
between them, said Phan.
Its not like the Manichean approach, which absolutizes
good and evil and sees them as forever opposed. Either/or, we think, not
both/and. Asians realize that when we reach the pinnacle of goodness on one
side, then beware: The other side will somehow show its face, for there is no
absolute light or darkness. Also, the reverse is true. In the murky depths of
evil, there is a spark of light.
Evil is unavoidable; it is part of the fabric of the
universe, said Phan, not necessary in a metaphysical sense, but
always there in our experience. In Asia we dont try to eliminate evil, we
try for balance. If we try to annihilate evil, then right off we encounter
obstacles and we obliterate those obstacles. We cant see the good in the
obstacle. Hitler justified the Jewish final solution this
way; he saw them as blocking the realization of his perfect world.
Terrorists surely think this way, said Phan. They say:
You are an obstacle to our goal, so we will eliminate you.
The Christian perspective suggests that a totally good world is
Gods gift, Phan said. Eliminating or subduing evil is a gift
bestowed on us, not something we can accomplish through our own efforts.
Usually the attempts to eliminate evil cause even more evil. Gratefulness and
humility are the proper response.
When we see peace and order as gifts, we wont run
roughshod over everything else, he said.
All of the Western religions -- Christianity, Islam and Judaism --
have this Manichean tendency, Phan said, that crops up over and over. It comes
from Persia originally.
In the Manichean view, God and Satan are opposites, and both are
absolute. When you absolutize evil, you try to remove it and do whatever
that takes. You demonize others. You call them devils, the anti-Christ. You say
that who is not with us is against us. This view has been labeled a
heresy in Christian history. Actually the Christian doctrine is that evil
is limited, says Phan. We profess actually there is only one
absolute being -- God. Everything else is finite.
The challenge for religious and spiritual leaders, according to
Phan, is to remind us of these basic lessons of our religion, to keep always in
mind the teaching that peace is a gift from God, maybe not something we achieve
by bombing everyone who opposes us.
When good people do nothing
What we need, according to Jesuit Fr. John Kavanaugh, professor of
philosophy at St. Louis University, is to look into how massive destruction can
pass itself off as a good thing, not to justify it but to understand it. How
does such moral perversion take place?
Kavanaugh told NCR: In the Middle East now, one side
calls us the great Satan while we call them the evil ones. I think these are
marketing terms really for the various sides to rally support.
The questions we need to ask, according to Kavanaugh, are these:
What is the dynamic that causes these people to do unspeakable evil, and how
can we deal with that dynamic in constructive and more peaceful ways?
Everybody that has ever been killed has been killed for a good
reason, said Kavanaugh. Ramzi Yousef, the convicted World
Trade Center bomber in 1993, said, I am a good terrorist. We
need to make some progress in understanding evil, Kavanaugh said, because the
world is getting smaller and more interconnected every day.
As Edmund Burke said, all it takes for evil to flourish is for
good people to do nothing. Good requires courage, nobility and vision,
according to Kavanaugh. Hitler came to power because no one really
resisted him. The U.S. turned away ships loaded with Jews looking for refuge.
European powers appeased him.
Resistance to Hitler in Germany was confined, as Simone Weil
pointed out, to the youth, the eccentrics and crazies. The churches, with some
notable exceptions such as the Lutheran pastor and theologian Dietrich
Bonhoeffer, said nothing. The Austrian peasant who resisted conscription in
Hitlers armies, Franz Jaggerstatter, is often held up as an example, a
simple man who did what church leaders and others could not do, say no to an
evil system. Both Bonhoeffer and Jaggerstatter were executed by the Nazis; both
are modern martyrs.
Once we have dealt with the terrorists, Kavanaugh
said, we need to look at major problems in the world, at all who are
unfed, unloved and unheard, who maybe seethe with resentment. The weapons
that are so easy now for terrorists to acquire and use are too destructive for
any other response.
The Russian novelist Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn pointed out that
dictator Josef Stalin, who was responsible for the murder of some 20 million of
his own people, could not have enjoyed his spectacularly evil success without
those around him turning a blind eye or refusing to speak out for fear.
Reflecting on his own experiences in Stalins prison camps, Solzhenitsyn
wrote:
Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and
evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political
parties either, but right through every human heart, and through all human
hearts. This line shifts. If only it were all so simple, if only there were
evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it was necessary
only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. Yet even within
hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained; and even
in the best of all hearts, there remains a small corner of evil. And who wants
to destroy a piece of his own heart?
Jesus weighed in on the topic of evil not with a label but with a
story: the parable of the weeds and wheat. Let good and evil grow up together,
then let God make the harvest; meanwhile do good to those who hate you. If evil
is only privation of good, those we call evil must necessarily be partly good.
In doing good to them, the good in us calls out to the good in them.
The Christians faith ultimately is that the direst straits
and most wretched events that can happen to us humans are bathed in the light
of Gods eternal love and that, in the end, in the words of the medieval
mystic Juliana of Norwich, All manner of things shall be well.
Rich Heffern is NCRs opinion editor. His e-mail
address is rheffern@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, January 11,
2002
|
|