EDITORIAL A just peace is more sensible than militarism
American religious leaders calling
for peaceful ways to end terrorism probably did not make many headlines in U.S.
newspapers. The news conference they held by phone Jan. 23 did not feature
violence, denunciations or even a photograph. Still, the four religious leaders
who participated in the news conference on the eve of the assembling in Assisi,
Italy, of world religious leaders and in anticipation of President Bushs
State of the Union Address had plenty of thoughtful remarks to make about the
United States today and its role in the world remarks that are worth listening
to in a time when short-term military responses to long-term problems are seen
as adequate, even sufficient.
Animating the speakers, all members of the Interfaith Coalition
for a Peaceful End to Terrorism, was a common conviction that military means
cannot produce an end to terrorism and a united appeal to Congress and
President Bush that the military conflict not be permitted to expand beyond
Afghanistan.
These remarks take on greater urgency in view of the Bush
administrations foreign policy as it was outlined in the State of the
Union Address. In calling Iran, Iraq and North Korea an axis of
evil, President Bush sounded the drumbeat of war. The president has the
international community frightened that the United States may go off on a
rampage. Americans should be equally alarmed. A popular leader who steers his
countrymen into an unconsidered war is common in history. Now, with patriotic
fervor smothering dissent, voices calling for thoughtful reflection, for peace
rather than war, are all the more necessary for being in short supply.
Enter the Interfaith Coalition for a Peaceful End to
Terrorism.
Even before Bush outlined his request for an astonishing $45
billion increase in defense spending, coalition member C. Joseph Sprague,
bishop of the United Methodist Church in Chicago, warned of Americans
love affair with the military.
We have in this country a deep and abiding love affair with
technocracy, with bombs and missiles. It borders on idolatry, Sprague
said at the news conference. The Methodist bishop went on to speak of the
collateral damage that Americans accept with few questions,
indifferent to the human suffering that bland phrase covers.
We fail in this culture to understand that our abstractions,
if unmasked, have human faces, said Sprague.
In seeking solutions to terrorism that are consonant with peace
and justice, the coalition emphasized that responses to terrorism must include
looking at and treating the root causes of terrorism: poverty, despair and
oppression. Rabbi Arthur Waskow, director of the Shalom Center in Philadelphia,
quoted a line from the Torah: Justice, justice, shall you pursue.
Justice requires not only a just end but just means, said Waskow, and justice
must be sought not just for yourself but for everyone.
The Interfaith Coalition for a Peaceful End to Terrorism might be
dismissed as a group of pie-in-the sky idealists, but the four speakers at the
news conference seemed to have a hardheaded grasp on the international
realities that prevail today. An end to terrorism cannot be expected until a
just peace is brokered in the Middle East, they said, an idea that was echoed
just days later by world economic leaders meeting in New York.
Waskow said the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories
must end, and attacks on civilians whether by Palestinian groups, by Israeli
groups or by the state of Israel can no longer be seen as a legitimate means of
expressing grievances. Waskow said the establishment of an international
nonviolent intervention force may be necessary because the two peoples are
caught up in such fear and rage that by themselves they cannot stop the cycle
of violence.
Americans must be resolute in their support for both an Israeli
state and a Palestinian state. They must insist that both are nonnegotiable and
must press their government to bring this about in an evenhanded way, said
Sprague.
Sister of St. Joseph of Peace Kathleen Pruitt, president of the
Leadership Conference for Women Religious, noted that the United States
interests in the Middle East have themselves become one of the underlying
causes of the violence there. The United States needs to examine its weapons
sales, she said, and to address its loss of moral authority in the Middle
East.
These were sensible remarks with which most experts on the region
would agree. Here, too, however, the Interfaith Coalition was advocating steps
counter to administration policy. The Bush administration is becoming less
evenhanded, not more, in the Middle East, where it has all but abandoned
criticism of Israeli violence, including assassinations of Palestinian leaders.
It recently foiled European peace efforts in the region that call for an
international monitoring force, but seems bankrupt of ideas on how to staunch
the hemorrhaging in the Middle East or even interest in the project. When the
French foreign minister compared the U.S. role in the Middle East to Pontius
Pilate, he was not off the mark.
Enthusiastic about taking on new military adventures in Iraq, Iran
and North Korea but uninterested in turning its attention to the ongoing
hostilities in the Middle East, the Bush administration seems on the verge of
demonstrating that it is easier to start fights than to finish them. The
Interfaith Coalition is one of the few voices pointing out that this may be an
expensive lesson for Americans to learn.
National Catholic Reporter, March 1,
2002
|