Sex Abuse
Crisis Vatican defends churchs handling of sexual abuse
accusations
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rome
For the first time since the sexual abuse crisis in the U.S.
church began, Pope John Paul II and senior aides have spoken about the problem,
saying they are profoundly afflicted by the sins of some of our
brothers, while insisting that most priests are innocent and suggesting
that American outrage may be exaggerated.
While Vatican officials say the problem is largely one for
American bishops to solve, the crisis has renewed debate about one possible
policy move at the level of the universal church -- banning, or at least
strongly discouraging, the admission of homosexuals to Catholic seminaries.
The lone papal comment to date came at the end of John Pauls
annual Holy Thursday letter to priests of the world, released March 21, and
dedicated largely to the sacrament of reconciliation. The language was
indirect, but the reference to the situation in the United States seemed
clear.
As priests, we are personally and profoundly afflicted by
the sins of some of our brothers who have betrayed the grace of ordination in
succumbing even to the most grievous forms of the mysterium inquitatis
[mystery of evil] at work in the world, the pope wrote.
Grave scandal is caused, with the result that a dark shadow
is cast over all the other fine priests who perform their ministry with honesty
and integrity and often with heroic self-sacrifice.
As the church shows her concern for the victims and strives
to respond in truth and justice to each of these painful situations, all of us
are called to commit ourselves more fully to the search for
holiness.
The document was presented at a Vatican news conference by
Colombian Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, head of the
Congregation for Clergy, the Vatican office that supervises priests.
Castrillón seemed defensive and occasionally angry. He cited canon law
to argue that no other global institution has the kind of internal legal
prohibitions against sexual abuse of minors by its officials as does the
Catholic church.
At the news conference, Vatican spokesperson Joaquín
Navarro-Valls solicited a series of questions from reporters for
Castrillón. They included whether or not the Vatican supports a
zero tolerance policy for priests accused of pedophilia, whether
the Vatican still has confidence in Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, and why the
pope didnt mention the sex abuse crisis by name. Most came from American
media and were offered in English.
The language used is interesting, Castrillón
said as Navarro-Valls turned the floor over to him. This by itself is an
x-ray of the problem.
Castrillón then read a prepared statement and refused to
answer the specific questions that Navarro had solicited.
There is no accurate comparative statistic regarding other
professions, [such as] doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, educators,
coaches, journalists, politicians or other common categories, including parents
and relatives, Castrillón said, suggesting that the focus on
priest abusers may be unfair. He cited a study by Philip Jenkins of
Pennsylvania State University that concluded that 3 percent of American priests
have a tendency to the abuse of minors and 0.3 percent are
pedophiles.
In a telephone interview, Jenkins told NCR that the numbers
cited by Castrillón come from a 1992 study in the Chicago archdiocese.
The numbers were presented in a 1996 book, Pedophiles and Priests.
The church has never ignored the problem of sexual abuse,
above all among its sacred ministers, even before it was on the front
pages, Castrillón said.
Castrillón then described a new set of Vatican norms issued
in April that give responsibility to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith for cases involving sexual abuse of minors by priests. The norms mandate
a canonical process before disciplinary measures can be enforced. The idea is
to ensure that an accused priest has the right to self-defense (NCR,
Dec. 14, 2001).
Castrillón defended the churchs tradition of handling
disciplinary matters internally, which he said dates to the apostolic period.
This does not mean that the church seeks to exempt itself from the civil
law in different countries, he said, except when it comes to the seal of
the confessional, and to secrecy linked to the exercise of the episcopal
ministry and to the common pastoral good.
Off the record, Vatican officials tell NCR that the pope is
following the American situation closely, and is appalled by the revelations.
At the same time, even granting the unprecedented scale of the disclosures,
they insist that most priests have not done anything wrong.
Moreover, Vatican officials say, it will take time to sort out how
many of the present allegations turn out to be true. In part, officials
suspect, the push to resurrect charges and to report them aggressively in the
press may be influenced by hostility to the strong positions of the Catholic
church on issues such as abortion, birth control and sexual ethics.
Bernard Law has always been a leader of the pro-life
movement, one senior prelate told NCR March 19. Some people
enjoy the fact that his problems in Boston will weaken that role.
In part, officials say, the present clamor is also fueled by
financial motives, since several dioceses have made large cash payouts to
settle sex abuse charges.
There is a well-founded suspicion that some of these
charges, that arise well after the fact, serve only for making money in civil
litigation, said Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, an official at the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in an interview published March 22
by the Italian journal 30 Giorni.
In a separate interview with CNN, Bertone called it a
strange fact that in the United States the church is forced under
civil law to pay for the misdeeds of single individuals.
This ordinarily doesnt happen, and shouldnt
happen, Bertone said.
In response to the push for mandatory reporting policies, which
would require bishops to inform police of any credible allegation of sexual
abuse against a priest, the Vatican has expressed caution. In the 30
Giorni interview, Bertone argued that a priest should be able to confide in
his bishop without fear of legal consequences.
Civil society has the obligation to defend its own
citizens, Bertone said. But it must also respect the
professional secrecy of priests
If a priest cannot confide
in his bishop because he is afraid of being denounced
it would be mean
that there is no more freedom of conscience.
Four other points came through in conversations with Vatican
officials in mid-March. The first was a message of solidarity with the American
bishops, coupled with the expectation that the bishops will move aggressively
to respond to the problem.
Second, despite calls from some quarters for a re-examination of
mandatory priestly celibacy, Vatican spokespersons have said the issue is not
on the table.
The pope has spoken to this. He has said celibacy remains.
It is a great gift to the church, said Fr. Ciro Bendettini, the vice
director of the Vatican press office.
Third, there is fear among some in the Vatican that the present
climate in the United States may lead to a witch hunt in which
innocent priests are tarnished by false, or at least unprovable, allegations.
While Vatican officials say priests who abuse minors should obviously have no
further contact with children, they are leery of quasi-automatic policies of
zero tolerance that impose punishment before guilt is
established.
Fourth, several Vatican officials underscore that in many cases,
the sexual abuse at issue is not pedophilia, but relations between priests and
adolescent males. This same-sex aspect of the crisis has renewed conversation
in the Vatican about policies concerning the admission of homosexuals to the
priesthood.
For the last several years, the Congregation for Catholic
Education has been preparing a document concerning seminaries, focusing in part
on the use of psychological testing in screening candidates. At one stage in
the drafting of the document, language was considered barring gays from
admission to seminaries.
In the wake of negative reaction from bishops, that language was
set aside. In recent weeks, however, the idea is drawing new interest.
Vatican officials point out that there is already a document from
1961, governing members of religious communities, which recommends not
admitting anyone to sacred vows who has perverse inclinations to
homosexuality or pederasty. A 1990 document for religious, however,
nuances that recommendation, suggesting that candidates who cannot
master their homosexual tendencies should not be admitted. Thus for
the 1961 document it is the orientation that is disqualifying, while the 1990
text suggests the problem is sexual behavior.
John Pauls March 21 letter is not his first comment on
sexual abuse by priests. In June 1993, amid another wave of disclosures in the
United States, the pope sent a four-page letter to American bishops in which he
referred to shocked moral sensibilities. Later that year, in
August, before a crowd of 18,000 in Denvers McNichols arena, the pope
condemned the suffering and scandal caused by the sins of some ministers
of the altar.
In an address to the Roman curia in December 1993, John Paul said,
Among those that are particularly painful are sexual [deviations] which
sometimes have involved, I say it crying, members of the clergy.
Most recently, in the November 2001 document Ecclesia in
Oceania, John Paul wrote that sexual abuse within the church is a
profound contradiction of the teaching and witness of Jesus Christ.
John L. Allen Jr. is NCRs Rome correspondent.
His e-mail address is jallen@natcath.org
National Catholic Reporter, March 29,
2002
|