The Independent Newsweekly
Issue Date: April 2, 2004
National Endowment for Democracy at center of dispute in Venezuela
By BART JONES
The United States is using a quasi-governmental organization created during the Reagan years and funded largely by Congress to pump about a million dollars a year into groups opposed to Venezuela President Hugo Chávez, according to officials in Venezuela and a Venezuelan-American attorney.
Some 2,000 pages of newly disclosed documents show that the little-known National Endowment for Democracy is financing a vast array of groups: campesinos, businessmen, former military officials, unions, lawyers, educators, even an organization leading a recall drive against Chávez. Some compare the agency, in certain of its activities, to the CIA of previous decades when the agency was regularly used to interfere in the affairs of Latin American countries.
It certainly shows an incredible pattern of financing basically every single sector in Venezuelan society, said Eva Golinger, the Brooklyn, N.Y.-based attorney who helped obtain the documents through Freedom of Information Act requests. Thats the most amazing part about it.
One organization, Sumate, which received a $53,400 grant in September, is organizing the recall referendum against Chávez, Golinger said. The head of another group, Leonardo Carvajal of the Asociación Civil Asamblea de Educación, was named education minister by dictator for a day Pedro Carmona, a leading businessman who briefly took over Venezuela during an April 2002 coup against Chávez, she said. A leader of a third group assisted by the National Endowment for Democracy and its subsidiary organizations, Leopoldo Martínez of the right-wing Primero Justicia party, was named finance minister by Carmona, she said.
How can they [the National Endowment for Democracy] say they are supporting democracy when they are funding groups that backed the coup? asked Golinger, head of the pro-Chávez Venezuela Solidarity Committee in New York.
Chris Sabatini, the endowments senior program officer for Latin America and the Caribbean, acknowledged the organization is handing out $922,000 this year, largely to groups opposed to Chávez, and gave out $1,046,323 last year. He said pro-Chávez groups have not received funds because they didnt ask for any or they rejected the National Endowments overtures.
Sabatini said there is no evidence that groups backed by the National Endowment for Democracy -- called NED -- participated directly in the coup, although he acknowledged Carvajal and Martínez were offered cabinet posts. He said the endowment made it clear to all groups it works with that it explicitly opposes unconstitutional actions. NED no longer funds Carvajals group, he added, because it was not meeting its objectives of developing education policies.
As for Sumate, he said the organization is merely monitoring the recall process and ensuring citizens get to exercise their constitutional rights.
The endowments work in Venezuela, he said, is aimed at promoting democracy and defusing festering tensions that could lead to a civil war. There is no ideological content to our work except working with committed democrats in countries where democracy is developing or under siege, he said in a telephone interview March 2.
The revelations about the endowments work in Venezuela is provoking criticism from some high-level officials, including members of the Congressional Black Caucus, that the United States is trying to destabilize and overthrow democratically elected governments in Latin America.
Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., charged that the Bush administration helped oust Haitis President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, and that it is trying to depose Chávez, as well. Were doing the same thing in Venezuela because we dont like Chávez, Rangel said on a radio roundtable discussion.
U.S. officials deny the allegations, and say Aristide fell and Chávez almost did because of economic mismanagement and human rights abuses.
The controversy over the U.S. role in Latin America intensified March 16 when Chávez joined Jamaica in declaring he would not recognize the interim government in Haiti that replaced Aristide. Chávez also offered asylum to the deposed Haitian president, who arrived a day earlier in Jamaica, where he has received temporary refuge.
A populist firebrand first elected in 1998, Chávez has polarized oil-rich Venezuela. Many middle- and upper-class residents charge he is a leftist dictator who has befriended Fidel Castro, wrecked the economy and fostered class hatred by referring to wealthy Venezuelans as corrupt squalid ones. But millions of poor people adore him for creating massive literacy programs, handing out land titles to slum dwellers and peasants, and combating a ruling class they say pillaged the nations vast oil wealth.
In the wake of disclosures about the National Endowment for Democracy, Chávez has dropped his past caution on the topic and now openly accuses the United States of backing the 2002 coup attempt and bankrolling efforts to destabilize and overthrow his government. He is also threatening that Venezuela, one of the worlds top oil suppliers, might cut off shipments to the United States if the Bush administration persists in its efforts to undermine him.
After Golinger had some of the NED documents delivered to Chávez, the Venezuelan president on Feb. 8 angrily denounced the funding of Sumate on his nationally broadcast television and radio program, Hello, Mr. President.
Then, as more information from Golinger arrived, Chávez stepped up his attacks. The government of Washington is using its peoples money to support not only opposition activities, but acts of conspiracy, Chávez declared in a speech Feb. 17. He directly accused the Bush administration of involvement in the coup. There is no doubt: The government of Mr. George W. Bush was behind the coup, Chávez said. We have photos, evidence.
The next day, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher accused Chávez of trying to divert attention from the recall referendum, and said U.S. funding in Venezuela is to promote democracy and strengthen civil society. Speaking in Washington at the departments daily press briefing, Boucher added that pro-Chávez groups and officials have benefited from the programs, although he and other State Department officials decline to name them. Golinger says that is because there are none, according to her research.
An investigation by the State Departments inspector general two years ago into the United States possible role in the coup determined that the work of the National Endowment for Democracy broke no U.S. laws. It also found there was no evidence the NED or the U.S. government did anything to encourage Chávezs unconstitutional overthrow.
But the report, A Review of U.S. Policy Toward Venezuela -- November 2001-April 2002, added that the endowment, the Pentagon and other U.S. assistance programs provided training, institution-building and support to individuals and organizations understood to be actively involved in the brief ouster of the Chávez government, although there was no evidence that this support directly contributed, or was intended to contribute, to that event.
The NEDs work in Venezuela is not the first time it has provoked controversy. In the 1980s it generated criticism by funding organizations opposed to the Sandinistas in Nicaragua, prompting accusations that its whopping $10.5 million in grants in a single year in the impoverished Central American nation bought the 1990 election that led to the Sandinistas defeat.
Many analysts contend the National Endowment for Democracy was created in 1983 to replace some CIA activities -- covertly supporting political parties, unions, newspapers, book publishers, student groups and civic organizations -- after the agencys work was reined in by Congress following revelations it carried out everything from assassinations to economic sabotage.
The groups involvement in Venezuela is in keeping with a pattern from NEDs very origins when the Reagan administration used it to do overtly what it was trying to do covertly in Nicaragua -- undermine the Sandinista revolution, said Peter Kornbluh of the National Security Archive in Washington. The difference of course is that Chávez was elected and the Sandinistas were a revolutionary government.
Kornbluh, author of The Pinochet Files and an expert on declassified government documents, added: The NED was created to supplement the activities of the CIA.
NED officials vigorously deny that allegation. Sabatini said the organization has promoted democracy around the world, from South Africa to Chile to Poland, where it assisted Lech Walesas Solidarity movement. The groups budget -- $44 million this year -- is approved by Congress, with both Democratic and Republican support.
Still, the NEDs own Web page traces the groups origins to the late 1960s when lawmakers first proposed creating an institution that would replace the covert means U.S. policymakers employed in post-World War II Europe -- including CIA assistance -- with overt funding for programs to promote democratic values.
In a Sept. 22, 1991, interview with The Washington Post, Allen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing the National Endowment for Democracy and who was the groups first acting president, said, A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.
The debate over the NED is the latest controversy over the Bush administrations role in Latin America. The United States initially blamed Chávez for his temporary overthrow in 2002, then later condemned the coup after an international outcry. U.S. Ambassador Charles Shapiro had breakfast in Miraflores presidential palace at 9 a.m. during Carmonas first day in power, indicating to some U.S. support for the coup. Carmona wiped out the nations democratic institutions including Congress, the Supreme Court and the Constitution -- moves Shapiro says he told Carmona he opposed. The institutions were restored when Chávez returned to power two days later.
Support from Bush
Beyond those disputes, Bush has brought back into power several figures from the Iran-contra scandal, including Otto Reich, who until recently was Bushs top diplomat to Latin America. Now hes serving as the White Houses special envoy to the region. His replacement as U.S. assistant secretary of state is Roger Noriega, a former aide to Sen. Jesse Helms, also known for his intense dislike of Aristide and Chávez. Both Noriega and Reich recently warned voters in El Salvador against electing leftist Shafik Handal in the March 21 presidential election. Handal, who lost, was the candidate of the FMLN, the party of the former guerrilla movement that battled the U.S.-backed government and its death squads from 1980-92.
Critics say the NEDs activities in Venezuela parallel the Bush teams desire to topple Chávez, an accusation NED officials deny. Like Ronald Reagan, who helped create the National Endowment for Democracy, Bush has proven to be a strong supporter of the organization. He spoke at the groups 20th anniversary celebration in November. Then, in January, he praised the endowment during his State of the Union address and called for doubling its budget, mainly for pro-democracy activities in the Middle East. Last fall the Senate and the House passed resolutions saluting the endowments work.
Even some of the NEDs critics concede the groups record is not all negative. I dont think its just the CIA reincarnated, said Elizabeth Cohn, a professor of International and Intercultural Studies at Goucher College, Towson, Md., who wrote her doctoral thesis on the National Endowment for Democracy. Parts of the organization do some very good work in strengthening democratic institutions and fostering democracy.
But the problem is when the NED oversteps its bounds and meddles in the internal affairs of other countries, radically altering the political landscape in pursuit of U.S. foreign policy objectives, she said. The $10.5 million it pumped into Nicaraguan opposition groups in a dirt-poor country with 4 million residents essentially threw the February 1990 election to Violeta Chamorro, the candidate for the U.S.-backed UNO coalition, Cohn said.
New organizations sprouted in Nicaragua and NED was first on the scene as their primary, sometimes only, funder, she said. NED monies mobilized the opposition and with the enormous amounts of money NED funneled into Nicaragua, they essentially bought the election.
Kornbluh agrees the NED played a key role in ousting the Sandinistas. It was very, very clear that NED was an overt side of a paramilitary war against the Sandinistas, he said.
NED officials deny their activities swayed the 1990 Nicaragua election, and contend the Sandinistas lost because they mismanaged the economy and committed widespread human rights abuses. They say their work there focused on building democratic institutions including an independent press, unions, universities and political parties.
Despite the controversy in Nicaragua, Sabatini said he believes the debate over the endowments involvement in Venezuela is overblown. The documents obtained by Golinger and Jeremy Bigwood, a freelance investigative journalist based in Washington, are not classified, Sabatini said, and are available to anyone -- as long as they file Freedom of Information Act requests. Theres a lot of bluster about something that is really entirely transparent and is entirely on the books, he said.
While he contends the National Endowment for Democracy is a neutral force seeking middle ground in Venezuela, Sabatini also said he has doubts about the democratic credentials of Chávez, who has shown a troubling lack of respect for institutions and rules and rhetoric that tends to inflame polarization. Some NED-funded organizations such as the economic reform group Cedice go farther. In one report Golinger obtained, Cedice compares Chávez to the Nazis. The group suggests another coup may be in the offing, saying, a democratic solution to the present political crisis will be well-nigh impossible if the referendum doesnt take place.
Michael Shifter, a former NED grants officer for Latin America who is now an analyst at the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington, said that if the NED is inserting itself into Venezuela under the premise that Chávez is a cruel tyrant who is wiping out democracy and must be stopped, the group is misreading the situation. While Chávez, a former paratrooper who led his own failed coup in 1992, has shown some troubling autocratic tendencies, Shifter said, democracy remains essentially intact.
The jails hold no political prisoners, he said. The opposition-owned press operates freely, with Chávez critics even calling for coups on national television. Tens of thousands of his opponents regularly protest in the streets. International observers considered the elections that brought Chávez to power free and fair. Foreign investors generally are happy, Shifter said. Despite significant opposition, Chávez retains a strong base of support.
As for the opposition, he added, theres this ambivalence about democratic methods.
Golinger says she is working feverishly before that ambivalence dooms Chávez. She says she and Bigwood obtained the NED reports over the last few months. Golinger has established a Web site where she is posting them, Venezuela FOIA Info.
This is one of the first times FOIA requests are being done in real time while its happening rather than years after the fact, she said. We posted them on the Internet so that the world would see them. After Chávez himself announced the Web site on his show Feb. 8 -- the day it was launched -- it got 15,000 hits in three days, Golinger said.
Golinger said her groups goal now is to save Chávez before he meets the same fate as Aristide. She and Bigwood also are submitting Freedom of Information Act requests to the CIA, the State Department, USAID and the Southern Command to determine the extent of their involvement in Venezuela.
Bart Jones is a reporter for Newsday and a former foreign correspondent for The Associated Press in Venezuela.
National Catholic Reporter, April 2, 2004
|Copyright © The
National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company, 115 E. Armour Blvd.,
Kansas City, MO 64111
All rights reserved.
TEL: 816-531-0538 FAX: 1-816-968-2280 Send comments about this Web site to: firstname.lastname@example.org