|Cover story -- Islam|
Issue Date: October 13, 2006
No retreat from 'reciprocity' challenge
By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
If anyone wondered whether the heartache of the last few weeks would persuade Benedict XVI to dial down his challenge to Islam on reciprocity, Vatican argot for the religious freedom of Christians and other minorities in Muslim nations, Sept. 25 showed the pope instead more determined than ever.
On that day, Benedict met with ambassadors from Muslim nations, along with representatives of Italys tiny but growing Muslim community, at his summer residence in Castel Gandolfo. It was a carefully choreographed damage control exercise, designed to turn a corner following his controversial Sept. 12 remarks on Islam. Even in this atmosphere of made-for-TV harmony, however, the pope could not resist laying down a marker on reciprocity, the one issue above all that has driven a more assertive line toward Islam within the Catholic church.
In his brief talk, the pope hit all the anticipated notes: dialogue, peace, mutual respect. He also, however, pointedly quoted John Paul IIs 1985 address to Muslim youth in Casablanca: Respect and dialogue require reciprocity in all spheres, especially in that which concerns basic freedoms, more particularly religious freedom.
Benedict did not elaborate. But the fact that he singled out this lone quotation from John Pauls vast body of speeches and messages on Islam, in a session carried live on Al Jazeera and widely seen as his best chance to quell anger in the Muslim street, indicates there were will be no retreat from the reciprocity challenge.
In reality, at least on reciprocity, almost no one disputes that the pope has a point. The imbalance between the basic freedom of Muslims in the West to worship as they choose versus a range of de jure and de facto restrictions on Christians and other groups in many Muslim nations is abundantly documented.
Bishop Thomas Wenski of Orlando, Fla., who has testified about reciprocity issues before the U.S. Congress as chair of the bishops International Policy Committee, said that the recent crisis offered a wake-up call to both Muslims and Christians regarding the urgency of talking about such matters.
Its put the need for dialogue on the radar screen, he told NCR.
The real question, experts on both sides of the Muslim/Catholic divide said in interviews, is not whether theres a problem to discuss, but whether Benedict -- or the Catholic church generally -- is equipped to be part of the solution.
Even a cursory review illustrates the challenges in the Islamic world.
In its annual report on religious freedom, the U.S. State Department flagged eight Countries of Particular Concern, four of which are majority Muslim states: Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Eritrea. (The others are Burma, China, North Korea and Vietnam.) The nonpartisan U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom cited another three countries, all Muslim states: Pakistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The commissions watch list adds an additional seven nations as problem areas, including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia and majority Muslim areas of Nigeria.
Likewise, the Washington-based Center for Religious Freedom lists seven countries as completely un-free, four of them Muslim: Turkmenistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan. (The others are Burma, North Korea and China.)
No Western government, and no majority Christian nation other than Cuba, makes either list. Of the 46 predominantly Muslim nations on earth, not one ranks in the top tier of religiously free states.
When the Italian branch of Aid to the Church in Need, an international Catholic charitable group, began producing an annual report on religious freedom in 1998, its first edition was focused on countries with a Muslim majority.
Experts caution that such findings, taken in the abstract, can be misleading. In many Muslim nations, they note, the most repressed groups are not Christians but other Muslims, such as non-Wahabbi forms of Islam in Saudi Arabia, or the Ahmadiyya movement in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia. Moreover, Saudi Arabias reasons for repressing religious expression (adherence to a strict form of Islamic doctrine) are different from Turkeys (commitment to Western-style secularization), even if in practice they can translate into similar policies.
Further, experts note, while there may be little de jure discrimination against Muslims in majority Christian states, de facto life can be just as hard. In the overwhelmingly Catholic Philippines, for example, Muslims worship legally, but in some parts of the country they live in fear of death squads.
Even in Europe, Muslims face difficulties.
In France, its hard to get a permit to build something that looks like a mosque, with minarets and the rest, said Mohammad Fadel, an Egyptian scholar at the University of Toronto. Its OK for Muslims to worship in warehouses, but not in identifiably Islamic structures. Recent explosions of rage in both France and England testify to the second-class citizenship young Muslims often feel in the West.
Finally, experts say, Islam has no monopoly on repressive behavior. Anti-conversion laws in majority Hindu India or in majority Buddhist Sri Lanka are just as appalling by Western standards, to say nothing of totalitarian states such as China or North Korea. In fact, Muslims in the Western China region of Xuar often bear the brunt of antireligious crackdowns by communist authorities.
A dismal record
Even so, the situation facing religious minorities in many Islamic countries, based on data collected from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, Aid to the Church in Need, and other sources, still makes for dismal reading:
Muslims often say that such examples are selective, pointing to other Islamic nations with allegedly better track records such as Jordan, Indonesia or Malaysia.
Even in traditionally tolerant Malaysia, however, trends are disturbing. Recently a woman named Lina Joy, who converted to Christianity from Islam in 1998, petitioned to officially change her religious status so that she could marry a Christian. She was refused by Malaysian courts on the grounds that the plaintiff exists under the tenets of Islam until her death. Other Malay Muslims who have attempted to convert have been imprisoned and sent to rehabilitation camps. Joy is currently awaiting a ruling from the countrys Federal Court.
Pluralism and Islam
Facing this record, the towering question is whether theres something inherent within Islam at odds with religious liberty.
Cardinal George Pell of Sydney, Australia, recently said that considered on its own terms, Islam is not a tolerant religion, though he clarified in a June interview with NCR that he meant to raise a question rather than propose a definitive conclusion.
In response to claims that there are different strains in Islam just as in Christianity, Pell issued this challenge: Show me where theyre tolerant.
Muslims say that challenge can be met.
Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Washington-based Muslim Public Affairs Council, said religious liberty is an Islamic principle. Al-Marayati said that where imbalances exist, they are generally the result of dictatorial regimes or social and political rivalries that have little to do with Islamic theology. He dismissed claims that the concept of the dhimmi, meaning a non-Muslim under Islamic law, condemns non-Muslims to subjugation. In principle, al-Marayati said, dhimmi denotes respect (in Arabic, it means honor), and its requirements are open to interpretation.
Reza Aslan, an Iranian-born journalist and scholar and author of No god but God: The Origins, Evolution and Future of Islam, argues that religious freedom is part of Islams genetic code.
There are few scriptures that can match the reverence with which the Quran speaks of other religious traditions, Aslan said, asserting that democratic ideals such as pluralism and human rights are widely accepted throughout the Muslim world, though not the Western notion that church and state must be separate.
Perhaps the most often-cited reference supporting an Islamic version of pluralism is sura 2, verse 256, of the Quran: There is no compulsion in religion.
In this regard, Aslan and other Muslim commentators contend that Benedict XVI made a critical error in his Sept. 12 address in Regensburg, Germany. The pope attributed this sura to the early Mecca period of Muhammads life, when Islam was a tiny minority -- the suggestion being that Muhammad abandoned tolerance once Islam attained political power. In fact, Aslan said, the sura comes from the later Medina period, when Islam was already a majority. That indicates, Aslan said, that religious pluralism is possible in majority Muslim states.
Some Christian activists think so too.
Nina Shea of the Center for Religious Freedom, the lobbyist widely credited with making anti-Christian persecution a hot topic on Capitol Hill, attributed the repressive climate within Islamic cultures largely to social and political factors, not the religion itself.
When I talk to Christians in these places, they usually say that theyve lived in peace with Muslims for generations, she said. Something has changed.
That something, Shea argued, is the emergence of a global politicization of Islam, which seeks to expand the reach of Islamic law to the entire planet -- an effort, she argued, that reached an apogee with reaction to Benedicts comments on Muhammad, with even the pope seemingly expected to obey Muslim laws on blasphemy.
Yet because politics rather than doctrine seem to be driving this trend, Shea said, perhaps it can be reversed.
Jesuit Fr. Tom Michel, who served as the Vaticans expert on Islam from 1981 to 1994, agreed that there are worrying developments in some countries, but said that most Muslims regard Shariah as a code for Muslims, not anyone else. Such a distinction, Michel said, can create the basis for a pluralistic society.
How can Benedict make the case for reciprocity in a way that doesnt feed extremism? Muslim and Christian experts recommended a six-point program:
Wenski said its important to cite cases where the church has stood up for other religions. Michel agreed, offering the example of former Cardinal Salvatore Pappalardo of Palermo, Italy. When Muslims in Palermo needed a place to worship, Michel said, Papallardo gave them an unused church.
This is not a Muslim/Christian thing, Michel said. The situation is just as bad, or worse, in places like India. Michel warned that an exclusive focus on Islam feeds suspicion that reciprocity is a smokescreen for Western interests.
Shea said the pope should direct his appeals not just to religious leaders, but to governments.
What needs to be recognized in the West is that most of Islam is controlled by Muslim governments, she said. The muftis [Muslim scholars who interpret the Shariah] are selected and paid for by the governments, the mosques are underwritten and registered, and the schools are controlled.
Wenski said the church must remind Muslims of common interests, pointing to the U.N.-sponsored Cairo Conference on population in 1994, when the Holy See and Muslim nations resisted liberal proposals on abortion.
Fadel said that as Benedict presses the reciprocity issue, he should avoid awakening old paradigms in the Muslim world, one of which involves outside powers using minority religious communities as a pretext for interfering in internal affairs, such as the British did with the Copts in Egypt.
Instead, Fadel recommended that Benedict present a universalist human rights agenda, stressing democratic and civil rights issues, such as free speech, freedom of the press, and voting rights.
As a Muslim, Fadel said he would welcome such a contribution from the pope. Anything that raises serious issues is always welcome, and the Catholic church still has a reservoir of goodwill, he said.
But in reference to the recent controversy, Fadel added: Last time he didnt do a very good job. The performance has got to get better.
John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is email@example.com.
National Catholic Reporter, October 13, 2006
|Copyright © The
National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company, 115 E. Armour Blvd.,
Kansas City, MO 64111
All rights reserved.
TEL: 816-531-0538 FAX: 1-816-968-2280 Send comments about this Web site to: firstname.lastname@example.org