Roundtable dedicated to Prayer at the
root of peace
Presentation by His Beatitude Cardinal Ignatius Moussa I Daoud
to the Religion and Cultures: Between Conflict and Dialogue summit
in SantEgidio, September 1-3, 2002.
Cardinal Daoud is Patriarch Emeritus of Antioch of the Syrians
and Prefect of the Congregation for Eastern Churches.
Monday, Sept. 2, 2002
(translation by NCR)
1. I want to begin by thanking the Community of
SantEgidio that, since 1987, continues to bring together every year so
many leaders of the different cultures and religions of the world, so that they
may reflect together on peace and hence on the means, the methods and the paths
that lead to peace. Truly, the community merits the application of the seventh
beatitude: Blessed are the constructors of peace: they shall be called
sons of God. (Mt. 5:9)
2. In connection with this roundtable dedicated to
Prayer at the root of peace, I want to greet the president of our
forum and the illustrious brothers who have agreed to speak, as well as all
those who have come in great numbers, attracted by the subject we want to
treat.
3. The meeting of Palermo this year is centered on
Religions and Cultures between Conflict and Dialogue. There are two
motives for which our meeting carries a particular importance. On the one hand,
it is the first after the terrible events of Sept. 11, and it precedes the
anniversary of those events by a week; on the other hand, this meeting is the
first after the recent prayer of Assisi, and it appears to want to be its
continuation.
4. The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that destroyed
places considered symbols of economic and military power, have placed in
evidence the fragility of the world situation and have provoked very diverse
reactions on the international level.
5. I would like to refer, in a special way, to two
representative voices that have made themselves heard in the world, although
with quite different principles and programs: President Bush and Pope John Paul
II.
6. The President of the United States has raised a great
alarm in the world, has created a never before seen military budget, and has
begun to combat the number one enemy of humanity: terrorism. One must choose.
One must stand either for or against terrorism. The military campaign conducted
by the United States arrived immediately and struck hard and quick. The Taliban
were defeated. A democratic regime was installed in Kabul. Every part of the
earth suspected of complicity in terrorism has fallen under threat. Iraq now
finds itself on the waiting list. The members of Al-Qaeda are pursued
everywhere. And despite it all, Bin Laden cannot be found, and Al-Qaeda does
not seem yet reduced to silence
The threat of terrorism has not yet been
distanced from us.
Where will this campaign finish? Will it succeed in stabilizing an
order of peace, preventing war with war, violence with violence, demanding the
arms of the enemy through the use of arms?
In the end, the arms remain in the hands of a part of the world,
and their presence expresses in itself an explosive situation.
Can arms play a meaningful role in limiting evil and insanity?
Even if they could, the sign of human division would remain, as
would the urgent appeal to reconciliation.
7. Pope John Paul II sees the world situation in a
different way. With his immediate condemnation of violence and terrorism,
without mincing words, the pope did not limit himself to noting the facts and
their apparent effects. He wanted to go to the problem in depth, tracing their
causes and origins.
Peace cannot be imposed with force.
Instead of arms, the pope proposes a general culture of peace.
For him, the most effective means for building peace are dialogue
and prayer.
This is the sense of the Second Meeting of Assisi, of January 24,
2002.
It could be said that the central point of the meeting were the
resolutions of the assembly. These ten commitments in favor of peace - which
have received the name of the Decalogue of Assisi - constitute a
true and proper charter of peace: condemnation of terrorism and every kind of
violence, mutual esteem, culture of dialogue, solidarity with those who suffer
and are oppressed, friendship among peoples, a program of voluntarily accepted
obligations and duties that point to the construction of a true peace in the
world.
However, if we look more closely, the soul of the meeting of
Assisi was prayer.
The meeting of Assisi was a day of prayer.
8. Why prayer?
If we look around ourselves, that is, at the history we suffer in
zones of the world where there is war and violence, violations of human rights,
injustices, enormous and shameful social differences, and an absurd culture of
death, we would only dare to speak of peace on the basis of the promises of
God, not the efforts and commitments of human beings.
Certainly it is not enough to reject war and violence, to
radically oppose ourselves to everything that works against human life, and to
elaborate strategies or fantasies that begin with diplomacy and human
efforts.
All this would remain radically insufficient if there is no
prayer.
9. Prayer, on the other hand, has its verification in the
history of the church. Allow me to refer to three prodigious and well-known
deeds, in which divine intervention is evident thanks to the faith, piety and
apostolic fervor of exemplary Christians.
Around 350 the Persian armies invaded Syria, carrying destruction
and death everywhere. They arrived at the port of Nissibe, which lived through
days of fear and agony.
St. Ephrem the Syrian, a well-known poet of the Madonna, father
and doctor of the church, born in Ninive, stood by his bishop, Jacob of
Nissibe, in prayer for the liberation of the city. In fact, Nissibe was saved.
The Persians were not able to enter and withdrew.
Lets mention a second fact of history. We find ourselves in
the middle of the fifth century. Attila, king of the Huns, commands a great
army, numerous in men and arms, and marches towards Italy. He devastates the
plains of Pavia and Milan, and with a determined path directs himself at Rome.
He is met by a serious man, majestic, Pope Leo the Great, who leads people with
no other arms than faith, prayer and the wisdom of the Spirit. Atilla, strongly
struck by the presence of that venerable old man, withdraws and frees his
prisoners. Rome is saved thanks to prayer.
Paris too was saved by prayer. Atilla marched against the city
commanding the Huns. The inhabitants of Paris, seized by panic, began to
abandon the city and flee. St. Genevieve addressed the inhabitants and advised
them to pray instead of fleeing. Convinced, though not without difficult, the
people stayed despite everything in the city. And Paris was spared. The same
St. Genevieve became the protector of the city.
From all that I have said come these conclusions:
Peace can be compared to salvation. In both cases, grace arrives
with prayer.
Salvation is a gift of God, and God offers it to those who, in
faith, open their hearts to it. In the same way, peace is a gift of God that
must be implored and requested with prayer.
God grants peace, but desires that we be collaborators with him
in love and prayer. The Savior has redeemed the world with his sacrifice, but
he wants that we be co-redeemers with him for saving souls.
Our prayer is founded on the love and the strength of God. With
the love and the strength of God our prayer can change the world and serve
peace.
National Catholic Reporter, Posted September 18,
2002
|