Catholic leaders respond to the U.S. Catholic
bishops pastoral letter, Living with faith and
hope
INTRODUCTION
We are a group of individuals from Catholic institutions and
religious congregations, as well as organizations with ministries to the
Catholic community, who have gathered together to reflect in the light of our
shared faith on the attacks of September 11 and on the response of our
government to those attacks. In particular, we wish to respond to the
invitation of the U.S. Catholic Bishops to engage a dialogue on the appropriate
response of the Catholic community to the U.S. war on
terrorism.
At their recent semi-annual meeting, the bishops issued a Pastoral
Letter entitled Living with Faith and Hope after September 11th in
which they reviewed our governments response to those events,
particularly in declaring war on the presumed perpetrators of the tragedies in
New York, Arlington, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. The bishops call for dialogue
among Christians and with other faith communities as a means to achieve peace.
In that spirit of dialogue, we wish to comment publicly on the current crisis
applying the principles the Pastoral Letter raised.
LIVING WITH FAITH AND HOPE
The bishops acknowledge and sympathize with all Americans in our
national tragedy, sharing the loss and pain, anger and fear, shock and
determination we feel at this time. They appeal to religious convictions
as we seek answers and appropriate mechanisms of response to the horrors
inflicted on the thousands of innocent people affected by the September 11
atrocities.
We affirm and echo the bishops outline of additional areas
of concern that need to be addressed in the aftermath of that fateful day.
These include: the need to redefine security; the call for a Palestinian state
and security for Israel as the only way to bring peace to the Middle East;
condemning the deadly use of sanctions against innocent populations in Iraq;
calling on the U.S. to address terrorism in Sudan; pointing to our
governments failures in helping development efforts to overcome the
worldwide scandal of poverty; criticizing our alliances with countries which
violate human rights; urging the U.S. to reverse both its predominant role in
the international arms trade as well as the growing proliferation of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons. The bishops also state that our country should
promote a more effective, responsible and responsive United Nations
organization.
These observations by the bishops are welcome in a world which,
because of its economic imbalances and propensity to violence, creates
conditions for a breeding ground for the kind of unconscionable attacks that
our nation suffered on September 11. Their call for prayer, fasting, teaching,
witness, dialogue, service, solidarity and hope should be reaffirmed in all of
our faith communities struggling to respond to our own pain and that of all
Americans.
THE WAR
The principles of Catholic moral teaching make possible, indeed
demand, a judgment on the morality of our governments massive military
response to the events of September 11th. The bombing of Afghanistan which
began on October 7 and the war that continues unabated come under the same
Gospel judgment as all of those realities which the bishops name so accurately
as requiring resolution if our world is ever to be safe.
It is unfortunate that some media interpreted the bishops as
judging this military campaign to be moral. Instead, what the
bishops did was offer guidelines for making such a moral judgment. We wish here
to apply those guidelines to the current War against Terrorism as a
way of inviting the entire Catholic community into further dialogue and deeper
discernment. The serious restrictions which Catholic moral teaching has placed
on warlike actions -- the so-called Just War Theory -- in practice
rule out modern warfare, as Pope John Paul II pointed out in judging the Gulf
War. We believe these restrictions also judge this war to be immoral, even
though it appears to have just cause. For example, the strong moral requirement
of immunity for non-combatants and the inadmissibility of indiscriminate
attacks on innocent people are violated in the collateral damage
suffered by innocent city dwellers in Kunduz, Kabul, Kandahar and elsewhere in
Afghanistan.
In addition, as the bishops statement points out, the
principle of proportionality must govern any nations political and
military decisions. In Just War parlance this means that the damage
to be inflicted and the costs incurred by war must be proportionate to the good
expected by taking up arms. In our judgment over two months of daily bombings
with all of their attendant human and material costs, including tremendous
military expenditures that rob from the poor, are not proportionate to our
legitimate right to seek out and bring before an international court of justice
those responsible for the September 11th attacks.
It disturbs us, as well, that many of the effects of the bombing
on non-combatants are withheld from the U.S. public by the military or a
self-censored media. A report issued on December 10th by University of New
Hampshire professor Dr. Marc Herold documents at least 3,767 civilian
casualties in nine weeks of the U.S. air war upon Afghanistan. As Catholics
convinced that each person is an equally valuable member of the human family,
we know that the innocent Afghanis killed by our bombs are as important as the
people lost in New York, the Pentagon and Pennsylvania. Both sets of victims
point to the tragedy of what is happening in our world and to what our faith
calls for in response.
Another condition cited by the bishops for a military action to be
considered justified is the probability of success. While this is admittedly a
difficult criterion to apply, it is intended to prevent an irrational resort to
force. The U.S. governments stated intention is to end terrorism
worldwide through political pressure and military force. To us it is clear that
no country, even one as powerful as the U.S., can successfully end terrorism by
the warlike actions we are witnessing today. The overwhelming military response
fuels anger and hatred, and serves to inspire new recruits to the causes
espoused by those who commit acts of terror. Key is the need to address
injustices and root causes that create the fertile soil in which disinherited
and disillusioned people are recruited into terrorism.
Another Just War principle demands that any military
response must be a last resort -- that all peaceful alternatives must be
exhausted before a country may turn to war. It is clear to us that the interval
between September 11 and October 7, when the U.S. began to bomb, was used by
our government to build an international coalition for a military response. The
refusal to present evidence of Osama bin Ladens guilt to the government
of Afghanistan and the immediate rejection of their offer to turn him over to a
third country signified a clear refusal on the part of the U.S. to seek
peaceful solutions.
We are convinced that the attacks on U.S. cities and citizens
constitute criminal acts to be dealt with by careful international police
investigations. The perpetrators should have been sought out and brought to
trial before such a tribunal as the World Court at the Hague. While we join our
voices to the global chorus condemning many dimensions of the oppressive
Taliban rule in Afghanistan, none of these justifies the military action of the
United States, since it can in no way be considered a last resort.
We believe that these moral assessments demand a new direction in
the worldwide response to terrorism. In addition we invite our bishops and all
Catholics to rethink the Just War tradition and seek a new paradigm
for judging questions of war and peace today.
What follows are suggested steps to be taken in that regard,
offered here to stimulate further reflection and discernment. It is our hope
that voices might be raised at every level of our faith community in support of
such steps, which we consider essential for achieving true peace.
FURTHER ACTIONS
1. The bombing and the war against Afghanistan must stop
and no new theater of military action should open. Let multinational police
action replace these military efforts to capture the perpetrators of the
terrorist violence of September 11th and turn them over to an international
court.
2. The rhetoric of war should cease. Without doubt the
destruction done in New York, Arlington, Virginia and Pennsylvania was massive.
In fact, it represents a grave crime against humanity, the crime of mass
murder. The act bears a greater likeness to the terrible crimes of
international criminal networks than it does to war.
3. For these reasons, we call on the executive and
legislative branches of our government to support and ratify the International
Criminal Court. Failure to do so represents a failure to establish an
appropriate and vital tool to address exactly these types of crimes.
4. Control of information has become a foremost weapon of
modern warfare. As people of faith, together with all citizens committed to the
truth, we demand an end to censorship in any form and under any pretext. We
need alternative reliable sources of information, as well as the existing media
establishment, asserting courageous leadership in pursuing the full truth.
5. All the results of the bombing and other acts of war in
Afghanistan must be made known, no matter who is responsible. The true extent
of civilian casualties must become public and as real to us as are the U.S.
casualties in the war.
6. We must see to the rebuilding of Afghanistan, which will
require a sustained commitment of support from the United States. It is morally
unacceptable for a senior U.S. official to say public comments like,
Were here to get these people. Thats why we came. Then
were leaving. The U.S. bears responsibility for what we have done
to Afghanistan. As the history of the 20th Century has shown -- including
previous U.S. government involvement in Afghanistan -- only a commitment to
help devastated nations rebuild a decent way of life for their people can
prevent future wars and terrorism.
7. A just and sustained resolution of the conflict between
Israelis and Palestinians, so significant and symbolic in the Arab world,
requires immediate and active engagement on the part of our country, along with
the international community. In their letter the bishops make this point most
emphatically.
8. Fear of terrorism is being used to create a climate in
which some of our Constitutional rights and liberties are being threatened.
Checks and balances set in place by the Constitution are also being
jeopardized. We call on our Congressional representatives to protect these
rights and liberties in accord with their sworn responsibilities to defend the
Constitution of the United States.
9. Greater focus needs to be placed on the larger context
in which these awful events occured -- massive poverty, discrimination and
unjust global economic systems. It would be of inestimable value for the cause
of peace to establish a government commission to study the grievances which are
manipulated by perpetrators of desperate attacks like that which we endured on
September 11th. Broad consultation must be undertaken. As Catholics, we can
draw on our international networks of Catholic institutions, religious and
missionary communities, and worldwide dioceses as valuable resources for
important information and faith-based judgments regarding local situations
across the globe, along with their partners in the larger interfaith community
and non-governmental organizations in the countries where they work. We need to
listen to their voices and to the voices of the marginalized, the poor, and the
victims of war and injustice whom our colleagues in faith accompany. We need to
call upon all of these resources as our partners in study and discernment, and
particularly in service of stopping a spread of U.S. military action to other
countries.
10. Religious justification has been used as an
indispensable tool of warfare. Therefore, Catholic responses after the crimes
of September 11th and especially after the commencement of bombing on October
7th must come under review and re-evaluation. The comments made within hours
and days by prominent church people justifying military retaliation in the name
of Just War principles may have contributed to an immediate war-making response
on the part of our government. Such declarations also gave the impression that
the church understands itself as a legitimate and authoritative moral voice in
giving permission for war. We are convinced that the first, and second, and
last words from leaders in the Catholic community must promote and explore and
lead the way along every possible peaceful avenue to conflict resolution and
the achievement of justice for all.
11. Finally, we call for the convening of fora throughout
the faith community to discern and chart a new Catholic paradigm to replace
Just War Theory. It is time.
CONCLUSION
We offer these reflections as our best prudential judgments in
promoting that dialogue called for in the bishops Pastoral Letter. We
pray that this attempt to articulate a more specific and far-reaching Catholic
moral consensus will be taken seriously and evoke further respectful and
discerning dialogue.
Our life as a people of faith, the direction of our beloved
country and above all, the lives of millions across the world demand that we
take seriously the Gospel challenge and seek, practice and pursue peace through
just and non-violent means. Our example in this witness is the Jesus of the
Gospels, the one who calls peacemakers blessed, who calls us to love our
enemies and pray for our persecutors, who reminds us that forgiveness is at the
heart of our faith, and that those who show mercy will have mercy shown them.
In that spirit we offer these reflections and call on our sisters and brothers
in faith to join us in this urgently needed witness of justice and peace.
National Catholic Reporter, Posted December 20,
2001
|