Document
Statement of Most
Reverend Edwin F. O'Brien
Archbishop for the Military Services, USA
December 30, 1998
A long-planned Christmas pastoral visit to our Nations
military serving in the Gulf region coincided by chance with the
bombings of Iraq by American and British forces in the Gulf.
I was able to witness at close hand the courage and professionalism
of the men and women of our armed forces during the very trying days
of military action.
In recent years and months, in the Middle East, Bosnia and in many
other parts of the world, our military have served in the role of
peacekeeper. In so doing, many have placed themselves, generously and
willingly, in great danger. Their military activities are ever subject
to civilian policy decisions as formulated by the executive branch of
our government. Presumably, military leadership is asked for opinions
and options in matters relating to their expertise. However, once
civilian leadership decides a policy requiring military action, it is
the sworn obligation of all in our armed forces to execute their
mission in complete obedience unless in a specific instance the
required action is judged clearly illegal or immoral.
The air strikes on Iraq by the United States and Great Britain have
been questioned in varying degrees by many nations of the world
community including the Holy See. In stating his profound sorrow for
the Iraqi people and for the failure of international law, our Holy
Father stated War has never been and will never be an
appropriate way to solve problems between nations.
The chair of the NCCB International Policy Committee, Archbishop
Theodore McCarrick, has echoed the concern of the then-president of
our Bishops Conference, Bishop Anthony Pilla, in raising serious
questions in mid-November as to the justifiability of military action
at this time; that is, whether just war requirements for noncombatant
immunity, proportionality and probability of success could be met in
the situation. ***
Archbishop McCarrick suggests that while answers to these
questions are not easy, and people of good will may come to different
conclusions it is his opinion that these military strikes
unduly risk violating just war criteria.
Our governments action should cause serious moral concern for
all Americans. Indeed, it has been reported that some senior military
officials expressed their opposition to these military actions,
opinions that civilian leadership chose not to accept. The strikes
purportedly were designed to avoid any and every civilian target once
initiated.
In executing orders that might violate just war requirements
military personnel face a serious moral challenge, and are not exempt
from making conscientious decisions. Any individual who judges an
action on his or her part to be in violation of the moral law is bound
to avoid that action. When clear moral conclusions that a particular
act is unjust cannot be reached because, for example, of lack of
sufficient evidence, the individual is justified in following the
presumably better informed decision of his or her superiors.
I join the bishops of our Country as well as the concerned voices of
the Holy See and other hierarchies in calling on our President and his
advisors to initiate no further military action in the Middle East;
rather to seek the assistance of the international community in
addressing peacefully and diplomatically, imaginatively and
perseveringly, the serious excesses of the Iraqi government that have
led to this crisis.
*** From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
2309 -- The strict conditions for legitimate defense by military
force require rigorous consideration. The gravity of such a
decision makes it subject to rigorous conditions of moral legitimacy.
At one and the same time:
- the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community
of nations must be lasting, grave and certain;
- all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to
be impractical or ineffective;
- there must be serious prospects of success;
- the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver that
the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction
weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.
These are the traditional elements in what is called the just
war doctrine.
The evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to
the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the
common good.
|